CopeMed II - ArtFiMed TD NÂº18 - Report of the ... - Fao - Copemed

More documents

Recommendations

Info

1. IntroductionThe FAO-CopeMed II Coordinator, Mr J. A. Camiñas, opened the meeting of theWorking Group on Small Pelagic Fisheries Management in the Alboran Sea under theEcosystem Approach to Fisheries. He welcomed the participants, thanking them fortheir participation and contributions. Experts from Algeria (Centre National deRecherche et Développement de la Pêche et de l'Aquaculture-CNRDPA), Morocco(General Directorate for Fisheries and Aquaculture and the Institut National deRecherche Halieutique-INRH) and Spain (Ministry of Environment and Rural andMarine Affairs, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries of the Junta de Andalucía, and theInstituto Español de Oceanografía-IEO) participated in the meeting. Mr. Camiñas alsothanked the Subdelegación del Gobierno (represented by Mr. F. Ron, Deputy GeneralSecretary and responsible for fishery issues) for its continued support to CopeMed IIand the present meeting.Following the introduction of the participants (Appendix I), the Agenda was adopted(Appendix II). Mr. Robles, former Director of CopeMed, phase I, was electedchairperson and Mr. Fernández, rapporteur. The CopeMed II Coordinator reviewed theobjectives of the meeting and CopeMed II’s creation of the Working Group onManagement of Small Pelagic Fisheries in the Alboran Sea under the EcosystemApproach to Fisheries.On the initiative of the Coordinator, it was agreed that the summarized presentationssent by the authors will be incorporated into the report of the present meeting.1.1. Description of the pilot project on small pelagic fisheries in the Alboran Sea.Objectives and expected results of the Working Group (J. A. Camiñas).The Alboran Sea is the westernmost portion of the Mediterranean, lying between Spain,Morocco and Algeria. The fisheries of small pelagic species in this area are veryimportant to the three countries: more than 200 vessels from the Moroccan and Spanishfleets fishing small pelagics in the Alboran Sea represent a mean landing of 30 000 tons,with a landed value of about 24 million euros; more than 3 500 fishers are directlyinvolved.The Coordination Committee agreed during its last meeting (Tunis, Tunisia, 6-7 May2010) to organize a meeting involving scientists, fisheries administrators and NGOs ofthe three countries to discuss the current situation of these fisheries, the national fisheryresources policy, the fishing regulations and management tools.1.1.1. Why an Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries (EAF)?Most of the world’s marine fisheries have been recognized as overexploited or fullyexploited. Overexploitation results in dramatic declines in marine populations, possiblybelow minimum viable reproductive levels, causing the commercial collapse offisheries. Over the last twenty five years, there has been much discussion of theapplication of the ecosystem approach to the exploitation of natural resources and tofisheries management 1 . “An Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries strives to balance diversesocietal objectives, by taking account of the knowledge and uncertainties about biotic,abiotic and human components of ecosystems and their interactions and applying anintegrated approach to fisheries within ecologically meaningful boundaries 2 .” By1 Publications prepared by the FAO may be consulted (www.fao.org) and are summarized in Appendix IIIof the present report.2FAO (2003). The Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries. FAO Technical Guidelines for ResponsibleFisheries, 4 (Suppl. 2):112pp.1
addressing both human and ecological well-being, EAF means to implement sustainabledevelopment concepts in fisheries.1.1.2. The pilot project on small pelagic fisheries in the Alboran Sea. Background.The idea was developed during phase I of CopeMed, and adopted by the CoordinationCommittee.The recommendations of a Stakeholders’ Forum (Madrid, 23-25 July 2003) on a PilotPlan for the Co-Management of Small Pelagic Fisheries in the Alboran Sea were:• Its long-term objective would be to apply a co-management approach to aspecific fishery with the three countries implied and the three actors of system(Administration, Industry and Research) involved.• Its immediate objectives are: jointly assess the small pelagic stocks in the area,try to harmonize different management measures within national legislations,take stock management decisions considering the ecosystem approach and thepossible effects of the pilot plan on the markets of the region, and build a modelthat could be applied in other GFCM subregions.During the CopeMed I Coordination Committee meeting in Tunis (May 2005), it wasagreed that, given the fact that there are no stocks of fishes or other exploitable livingmarine resources that are clearly limited to water under the sole jurisdiction of anyMediterranean country, it is recommended that the countries collaborate amongthemselves and with the Regional Fisheries Organisations to harmonizing their nationallegislation governing the fishery exploitation, management and research and, in relationto the pilot project for the Alboran Sea, “Before the production of co-managementdecisions, it should be clarified if shared stocks are present in this area, therefore theproject should focus more on deepening the knowledge on small pelagic resources.”1.1.3. Objectives and outputs of CopeMed II related to small pelagic fisherymanagementThe expected outputs of the CopeMed II Objective 3 related to the small pelagicfisheries of the Alboran Sea 3 mention that the stocks in the Alboran Sea will be jointlyanalysed by experts from the different countries around the Alboran Sea and commondatabases on the sardine and anchovy fisheries will be created.During the last CopeMed II Coordination Committee meeting in Tunis, the interest inadvancing with this issue was affirmed 4 .1.1.4. Objectives of the meeting and expected resultsThe objectives of the present meeting are as follows:• The implementation of the EAF in the fisheries of the Alboran Sea.• The analysis of the different components: national fleets; social and economicaspects and the corresponding indicators; and the state of the stocks and stocksassessment.• A joint approach to the existing national management tools and managementprocedures with the medium-term objective of harmonizing the regulations.• Incorporate stakeholders into the management process: co-management.3 CopeMed II Objective 3: Strengthening the institutional capacity at national level (functioning oforganizations, relations between actors, development of management strategies) and at sub-regional level.4 CopeMed II should continue supporting cooperation on research on the small pelagic fish in the AlboranSea to facilitate the preparation of proposals for the management of these stocks. The project shouldorganize the subregional demersal and small pelagic Working Groups on shared stocks; update theinformation on the small pelagics in the Alboran Sea and draft recommendations for the administrations.2
Page 1 and 2: CopeMed II - ArtFiMed Technical Doc
Page 3 and 4: The conclusions and recommendations
Page 5 and 6: CopeMed II (GCP/INT/028/SPA - GCP/I
Page 7: INDEX1. Introduction ..............
Page 11 and 12: • Horse mackerel (of overall leng
Page 13 and 14: years of gathering data and fisheri
Page 15 and 16: Discussion:• Evolution of the fle
Page 17 and 18: The Working Group acknowledged that
Page 19 and 20: extended. He also informed the part
Page 21 and 22: Ana Judith MARTÍNSecretaria Genera
Page 23 and 24: 3.2. Sensitive areas for small pela
Page 25 and 26: Appendix IV: Summary of The Alboran
Page 27 and 28: Appendix VI: Summary of the Exploit
Page 29 and 30: Appendix VIII: Summary of Review an
Page 31 and 32: Appendix X: Summary of Research pro
Page 33 and 34: Appendix XII: Summary of Management
Page 35 and 36: Appendix XIII: Summary of Managemen
Page 37 and 38: funcionalidades y servicios. Básic
Page 39 and 40: Appendix XV: Draft of the Terms of
Page 41 and 42: Situación Pesquería Pequeños Pel
Page 59 and 60:
Situación Pesquería Pequeños Pel
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
5. BIBLIOGRAFÍAAbad, R. y A. Giral
Page 79 and 80:
6. ANEXOSituación Pesquería Peque
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
SOMMAIREINTRODUCTION……………
Page 91 and 92:
I. DESCRIPTION DE LA FLOTTELa pêch
Page 93 and 94:
350,00valeur (millions de Dhs)300,0
Page 95 and 96:
100%80%60%40%20%2008200720062005200
Page 97 and 98:
c. Flotte dont la longueur est comp
Page 99 and 100:
la pression de pêche. Durant la p
Page 101 and 102:
0,180,160,140,120,10,080,060,040,02
Page 103 and 104:
Tableau 2 : Paramètres de croissan
Page 105 and 106:
MER D’ALBORANFigure 14 : Carte d
Page 107 and 108:
MER D’ALBORANFigure 18 : Position
Page 109 and 110:
3. Contrôle des activités de pêc
Page 111 and 112:
IV. SUIVI ET PROJETS SCIENTIFIQUESP
Page 113 and 114:
La population du chinchard est repr
Page 115 and 116:
- AMENZOUI, K. ; FERHAN-TACHINANTE,
Page 117 and 118:
Cap de l'EauNador904540353025201510
Page 119 and 120:
SARDINE50%ALLACHE5%Capture 2003ANCH
Page 121 and 122:
Textes juridiques réglementant la
Page 123 and 124:
Appendix XVIII: Review and update o
Page 125 and 126:
Resumen ejecutivo.Plan piloto para
Page 127 and 128:
Résumé exécutif.Plan pilote pour
Page 129 and 130:
1. AntecedentesDurante la vigencia
Page 131 and 132:
en los procesos hidrodinámicos que
Page 133 and 134:
desembarcos totales en los últimos
Page 135 and 136:
Figura 4. Distribución espacial de
Page 137 and 138:
anualmente desde 2002, prospectando
Page 139 and 140:
MER D’ALBORANFigura 10. Distribuc
Page 141 and 142:
Capturas desembarcadasLas capturas
Page 143 and 144:
SalariosBasándose en los datos de
Page 145 and 146:
maduración, período de reproducci
Page 147 and 148:
3.5. Regulación y gestiónEspañaA
Page 149 and 150:
Tabla 8. Fortalezas y debilidades d
Page 151 and 152:
considerados válidos para activar
Page 153 and 154:
continuación se presenta, por espe
Page 155 and 156:
Tabla 10. Resultados del CCA de las
Page 157 and 158:
primera maduración de la anchoa en
Page 159 and 160:
un reciente trabajo sobre diferenci
Page 161 and 162:
5. Para el seguimiento del Plan se
Page 163 and 164:
8. BibliografíaAbad, R., Miquel, J
Page 165 and 166:
Pérez de Rubín, J. (ed.) 1997. La
Page 167 and 168:
ANEXO IInformación disponible en C
Page 169 and 170:
Etat des stocksIl n’y a pas d’i
Page 171 and 172:
Campagnes d’évaluation de la res
Page 173 and 174:
1ª campaña acústica1ª época de
Page 175 and 176:
Si se compara la evolución de los
Page 177 and 178:
• La pesquería seguiría cerrada
Page 179 and 180:
1. JUSTIFICATIONL’un des objectif
Page 181 and 182:
mesurée en poids est relativement
Page 183 and 184:
sont attachées aux ports d’Almer
Page 185 and 186:
petits pélagiques pourrait permett
Page 187 and 188:
Promotor:COPEMEDMiembro 1 Miembro 2
Page 189 and 190:
4.4. Application pratique d’une g
show all

CopeMed II - ArtFiMed TD NÂº18 - Report of the ... - Fao - Copemed

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?