Tidig behandling - varför, när och hur? - Tandläkartidningen

VETENSKAP & KLINIK
TEMA: ORTODONTI
have obtained good results with early orthodontic
treatment. Clinical experience shows
that it has been possible to reduce further need
of treatment, simplify later treatment phases,
and to expand the coverage of treatment.
»Finska ortodontister och tandläkare har
samlat en mängd praktisk erfarenhet som
gör det lättare att använda apparatur som är
lämpade för mjölktands- och växelbettet.«
REFERENSER
1. Moorrees CFS. The dentition
of the growing child. Cambridge,
Massachusetts:
Harvard University Press;
1959.
2. Varrela J. Early developmental
traits in class II malocclusion.
Acta Odontol Scand
1998; 56: 375–7.
3. Larsson E. The effect of
dummy–sucking on the
occlusion: a review. Eur J
Orthod 1986; 8: 127–30.
4. Lindner A, Modeer T. Relation
between sucking habits
and dental characteristics in
preschoolchildren with
unilateral cross-bite.
Scand J Dent Res 1989;
97: 278–83.
5. Keski-Nisula K, Lehto R, Lusa
V, Keski-Nisula L, Varrela J.
Occurrence of malocclusion
and need of orthodontic
treatment in early mixed
dentition. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop 2003;
124: 631–8.
6. Arya BS, Savara BS, Thomas
DR. Prediction of first molar
occlusion. Am J Orthod
1973; 63: 610–22.
7. Bishara SE, Hoppens BJ,
Jacobsen JR, Kohout FJ.
Changes in the molar relationship
between the deciduous
and permanent dentitions:
A longitudinal study.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 1988; 93: 19–28.
8. Leighton BC. The early signs
of malocclusion. Trans Eur
Orthod Soc 1969; 45: 353–
68.
9. Leighton BC. The early
development of normal
occlusion. Trans Eur Orthod
Soc 1975; 47: 67–77.
10. Bergersen EO. A longitudinal
study of anterior vertical
overbite from eight to
twenty years of age. Angle
Orthod 1988; 58: 237–56.
11. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara
JA Jr, Tollaro I. Early
dentofacial features of Class
II malocclusion: a longitudinal
study from the deciduous
through the mixed
dentition. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop 2000;
111: 502–9.
12. Bjerklin K, Gleerup A, Kurol
J. Long-term treatment
effects in children with ectopic
eruption of the maxillary
first permanent molars.
Eur J Orthod 1995; 17: 293–
304.
13. Vakiparta MK, Kerosuo HM,
Nyström ME, Heikinheimo
KA. Orthodontic treatment
need from eight to 12 years
of age in an early treatment
oriented public health care
system: a prospective study.
Angle Orthod 2005; 75:
344–9.
14. King GJ, Wheeler TT, McGorray
SP, Aiosa LS, Bloom RM,
Taylor MG. Orthodontist’s
perceptions of the impact of
phase 1 treatment for Class I
malocclusion on Phase 2
needs. J Dent Res 1999;
78: 1745–53.
15. Pietilä T, Alanen P, Nordblad
A, Kotilainen J, Pietilä I,
Pirttiniemi P,et al. Hampaiden
oikomishoito terveyskeskuksissa.
STAKES, Raportti
279, 2004.
16. Keski-Nisula K, Hernesniemi
R, Heiskanen M, Keski-
Nisula L, Varrela J. Orthodontic
intervention in the
early mixed dentition: a
prospective controlled study
on the effects of eruption
guidance appliance.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop, in press.
17. Varrela J. Orthodontics in
the early mixed dentition:
Effectiveness and efficiency
of eruption guidance appliance.
In: McNamara JA Jr
and Kelly KA eds. Early
orthodontic treatment: is
the benefit worth of the
burden? Craniofacial Growth
Series, Vol. 44, Ann Arbor:
Department of Orthodontics
and Pediatric Dentistry and
the Center for Human
Growth and Development,
University of Michigan, in
press.
18. Thilader B, Rubio G, Pena L,
de Mayorga C. Prevalence of
temporomandibular dysfunction
and its association
with malocclusion in children
and adolescents: an
epidemiologic study related
to specified stages of dental
development. Angle Orthod
2002; 72: 146–54.
19. Kurol J, Modin H, Bjerkhoel
A. Orthodontic maxillary
expansion and its effect on
nocturnal enuresis. Angle
Orthod 1998; 68: 225–32.
20. Thilader B, Lennartsson B. A
study of children with unilateral
posterior crossbite,
treated and untreated, in
the deciduous dentition -
occlusal and skeletal characteristics
of significance in
predicting the long-term
outcome. J Orofac Orthop
2002; 63: 371–83.
21. Petren S, Bondemark L,
Söderfeldt B. A systematic
review concerning early
orthodontic treatment of
unilateral posterior crossbite.
Angle Orthod 2003; 73:
588–96.
22. Bell RA, LeCompte EJ. The
effects of maxillary expansion
using a quad-helix
appliance during the deciduous
and mixed dentitions.
Am J Orthod 1981; 79: 152–
61.
23. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara
JA Jr. Cephalometric
variables predicting the
long-term success or failure
of combined rapid maxillary
expansion and facial mask
therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 2004; 126:
16–22.
24. Yoshida I, Ishii H, Yamaguchi
N, Mizoguchi I. Maxillary
protraction and chincap
appliance treatment effects
and long-term changes in
skeletal class III patients.
Angle Orthod 1999; 69:
543–52.
25. Hagg U, Tse A, Bendeus M,
Rabie AB. Long-term followup
of early treatment with
reverse headgear. Eur J
Orthod 2003; 25: 95–102.
26. Tulloch JFC, Antczak-Bouckoms
AA, Tuncay OC. A review
of clinical research in orthodontics.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 1989; 95: 499–
504.
27. Tulloch JFC, Proffit WR,
Phillips C. Influences on the
outcome of early treatment
for the Class II malocclusion.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial
Orthop 1997; 111: 533–42.
28. Forsberg CM, Tedestam G.
Etiological and predisposing
factors related to traumatic
injuries to permanent teeth.
Swed Dent J 1993; 17:
183–90.
29. Borssén E, Holm AK. Traumatic
dental injuries in a
cohort of 16-year-olds in
northern Sweden. Endod
Dent Traumatol 1997; 13:
276–80.
30. Shaw WC, Meek SC, Jones
DC. Nicknames, teasing,
harassment and the salience
of dental features among
school children. Br J Orthod
1980; 7: 75–80.
31. Shaw WC, Rees G, Dawe M,
Charles CR. The influence of
dentofacial appearance on
the social attractiveness of
young adults. Am J Orthod
1985; 87: 21–6.
32. Secord PF, Backman CW.
Malocclusion and psychological
factors. J Am Dent
Assoc 1959;59:931–8.
33. Kirjavainen M, Kirjavainen T,
Hurmerinta K, Haavikko K.
Orthopedic cervical headgear
with an expanded inner
bow in class II correction.
Angle Orthod 2000; 70:
317–25.
34. Kirjavainen M, Kirjavainen T.
Maxillary expansion in Class
II correction with orthopedic
cervical headgear. A
posteroanterior cephalometric
study. Angle Orthod
2003;73:281-5.
35. Mantysaari R, Kantomaa T,
Pirttiniemi P, Pykalainen A.
The effects of early headgear
treatment on dental arches
and craniofacial morphology:
a report of a 2 year
randomized study. Eur J
Orthod 2004;26:59-64.
36. Pirttiniemi P, Kantomaa T,
Mantysaari R, Pykalainen A,
Krusinskiene V, Laitala T, et
al. The effects of early
headgear treatment on
dental arches and craniofacial
morphology: an 8 year
report of a randomized
study. Eur J Orthod
2005;27:429-36.
37. Wieslander L. Early or late
cervical traction therapy of
Class II malocclusion in the
mixed dentition. Am J
Orthod 1975;67:432-9.
38. Melsen B. Effects of cervical
anchorage during and after
treatment: an implant study.
Am J Orthod 1978;73:526-
40.
39. Pirila-Parkkinen K, Pirttiniemi
P, Nieminen P, Lopponen
H, Tolonen U, Uotila R,et al.
Cervical headgear therapy as
a factor in obstructive sleep
apnea syndrome. Pediatr
Dent 1999;21:39-45.
tandlakartidningen.se
TANDLÄKARTIDNINGEN ÅRG 99 NR 1 2007
55