09.04.2021 Views

ny-teknik-och-digitala-losningar-for-okad-inkludering

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Summary<br />

On behalf of the Nordic Welfare Centre, professor Jan Gulliksen at<br />

KTH Royal Institute of Technology, and Stefan Johansson and Mia<br />

Larsdotter at Begripsam, have investigated whether evidence-based<br />

research shows that new digital and technological solutions make it<br />

easier <strong>for</strong> people with disabilities to get or keep a job.<br />

We have found no strong evidence to support this in documented<br />

research. It would appear that research on the effects of<br />

implementing technology in this field is very rare.<br />

We have noted that the provision of assistive technology primarily<br />

appears to cover products that are relatively old, and it is difficult to<br />

incorporate new and innovative technological solutions into the<br />

current product range. Innovation more often takes place in a<br />

mature technology area, such as hearing technology, rather than a<br />

totally new technology area. Thus, the current system <strong>for</strong> providing<br />

assistive technology in the Nordic countries appears to preserve the<br />

use of products that have traditionally been used rather than<br />

stimulating the introduction of new digital and technological<br />

innovations. This places assistive technology in stark contrast to<br />

welfare technology, in which technology in the home is<br />

characterised by a diversity of innovators and an influx of new<br />

technical solutions.<br />

What we have been able to find is research that produces advanced<br />

prototypes or single copies of a technological solution, often<br />

research projects where a few individuals have tested a technical<br />

solution, often with good results. In ma<strong>ny</strong> cases, the research<br />

concerns individual case studies. For example, a single individual will<br />

be involved in developing a very advanced prosthesis. Research<br />

articles presenting this type of work often conclude with a discussion<br />

about the potential of technology. This <strong>for</strong>m of research often stops<br />

at that point. It can be seen as a natural consequence of the research<br />

question, which is often “how can this technology work <strong>for</strong> this type<br />

of person?”. However, such research is rarely developed further – to<br />

the implementation stage or to evidence-based studies into whether<br />

the technology actually enables more people to get or keep a job.<br />

The context <strong>for</strong> the research can be a workplace, although this<br />

appears to be more to do with the fact that the workplace is a<br />

suitable environment <strong>for</strong> working on current research issues, rather<br />

than it being a systematic approach to facilitate employment and<br />

work opportunities <strong>for</strong> people with disabilities. When such research<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!