21.02.2013 Views

fdi in india and its growth linkages - Department Of Industrial Policy ...

fdi in india and its growth linkages - Department Of Industrial Policy ...

fdi in india and its growth linkages - Department Of Industrial Policy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Pradesh <strong>and</strong> Gujarat to as low as about 26 per cent <strong>in</strong> Maharashtra <strong>and</strong> Karnataka. Thus, there is a strik<strong>in</strong>g similarity<br />

between the distribution <strong>and</strong> reach of domestic <strong>and</strong> FDI plants <strong>in</strong> Class-3 cities. This provides a strong <strong>in</strong>dication of<br />

economies of agglomeration across Class-3 cities <strong>in</strong> various states.<br />

A further check on degree of association between the number of domestic <strong>and</strong> FDI plants <strong>in</strong> 244 matched cities has<br />

been conducted through f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the correlation coefficient between the two variables at the all-India as well as the<br />

state level. The correlation coefficient between city-wise distribution of domestic <strong>and</strong> foreign plants is 0.89,<br />

suggest<strong>in</strong>g that there is a strong l<strong>in</strong>kage between the co-existence of domestic <strong>and</strong> FDI manufactur<strong>in</strong>g plants (Table<br />

6.16). Even though state-wise correlation is somewhat weak among less important <strong>in</strong>dustrial states, it is relatively<br />

strong across the major <strong>in</strong>dustrial states, e.g., 0.99 for Karnataka, 0.97 for Andhra Pradesh, 0.96 for West Bengal, <strong>and</strong><br />

0.93 each for Gujarat <strong>and</strong> Maharashtra.<br />

The details of names <strong>and</strong> characteristics of 50 unmatched cities that have 51 FDI manufactur<strong>in</strong>g plants are provided<br />

<strong>in</strong> Annex-1 of this chapter (given after 55 tables of this chapter). Similar details on 244 matched cities are provided<br />

<strong>in</strong> Annex-2 of this chapter. Details of FDI manufactur<strong>in</strong>g plants located across the country are provided <strong>in</strong><br />

Annex-3 of this chapter.<br />

6.2.4 Service Firms’ Facilities<br />

FDI-enabled service firms are spread over 369 cities across India, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 311 (84 per cent) Class-3 cities (Table 6.17).<br />

Andhra Pradesh has the highest number of cities (126) with FDI-enabled service facilities; these <strong>in</strong>clude 121 Class-3<br />

cities. Karnataka has 76 cities with FDI-enabled service facilities, of which 73 cities are Class-3. Other states have<br />

significantly fewer cities <strong>in</strong> which FDI-enabled service facilities are located.<br />

<strong>Of</strong> a total of 1,257 FDI-enabled service facilities, 35 per cent are located <strong>in</strong> Class-3 cities. The state-wise share of FDIenabled<br />

service facilities located <strong>in</strong> Class-3 cities is 61 per cent <strong>in</strong> Andhra Pradesh; 43 per cent <strong>in</strong> Karnataka; 18 per cent<br />

<strong>in</strong> Tamil Nadu; <strong>and</strong> 3 per cent <strong>in</strong> Maharashtra (Table 6.18).<br />

6.3 Sectoral Details of FDI <strong>in</strong> Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Sector<br />

The data of FDI firms/plants for more recent periods have been used to gauge the current economic performance of<br />

these firms/plants. The period April 2006 – March 2008 has been used as the period of current reference to cull the<br />

latest reported f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>and</strong> operative data. As mentioned earlier, Capital<strong>in</strong>e cannot report data for all firms at a<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t of time, say March 2008, s<strong>in</strong>ce it receives f<strong>in</strong>ancial reports of the firms at different po<strong>in</strong>ts of time <strong>and</strong><br />

some firms may not have reported their latest figures. The cut-off dates, viz., April 2006 <strong>and</strong> March 2008 have been<br />

decided to <strong>in</strong>clude three consecutive years, viz., 2005-06 to 2007-08 to extract the latest available <strong>in</strong>formation on<br />

FDI manufactur<strong>in</strong>g firms <strong>and</strong> plants. This <strong>in</strong>formation has been used to study FDI agglomeration/cluster<strong>in</strong>g issues<br />

as well as other performance <strong>in</strong>dicators of firms <strong>and</strong> plants <strong>and</strong> NIC 3-digit sectors across states <strong>and</strong> cities. These<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>in</strong>clude market capitalisation, equity, net fixed capital, output, employment, value-added <strong>and</strong> outputcapital<br />

ratio <strong>and</strong> FDI sectoral <strong>in</strong>tensity. 7 FDI-specific <strong>in</strong>dicators have also been compared with the correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

domestic <strong>in</strong>dicators.<br />

6.3.1 Spread across States: Firms <strong>and</strong> Plants<br />

We were able to retrieve the latest <strong>in</strong>formation on 351 FDI firms with 1,171 plants spread over 275 cities, thus imply<strong>in</strong>g<br />

3.3 plants per firm on average. The correspond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation for domestic plants is available for 3,107 firms that have<br />

8,485 plants spread over 958 cities (Table 6.19).<br />

7. Net fixed capital has been taken as the book value reported <strong>in</strong> the balance sheets of the firms <strong>in</strong> our database.<br />

SECONDARY DATA-BASED ANALYSIS<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!