fdi in india and its growth linkages - Department Of Industrial Policy ...
fdi in india and its growth linkages - Department Of Industrial Policy ...
fdi in india and its growth linkages - Department Of Industrial Policy ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Pradesh <strong>and</strong> Gujarat to as low as about 26 per cent <strong>in</strong> Maharashtra <strong>and</strong> Karnataka. Thus, there is a strik<strong>in</strong>g similarity<br />
between the distribution <strong>and</strong> reach of domestic <strong>and</strong> FDI plants <strong>in</strong> Class-3 cities. This provides a strong <strong>in</strong>dication of<br />
economies of agglomeration across Class-3 cities <strong>in</strong> various states.<br />
A further check on degree of association between the number of domestic <strong>and</strong> FDI plants <strong>in</strong> 244 matched cities has<br />
been conducted through f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the correlation coefficient between the two variables at the all-India as well as the<br />
state level. The correlation coefficient between city-wise distribution of domestic <strong>and</strong> foreign plants is 0.89,<br />
suggest<strong>in</strong>g that there is a strong l<strong>in</strong>kage between the co-existence of domestic <strong>and</strong> FDI manufactur<strong>in</strong>g plants (Table<br />
6.16). Even though state-wise correlation is somewhat weak among less important <strong>in</strong>dustrial states, it is relatively<br />
strong across the major <strong>in</strong>dustrial states, e.g., 0.99 for Karnataka, 0.97 for Andhra Pradesh, 0.96 for West Bengal, <strong>and</strong><br />
0.93 each for Gujarat <strong>and</strong> Maharashtra.<br />
The details of names <strong>and</strong> characteristics of 50 unmatched cities that have 51 FDI manufactur<strong>in</strong>g plants are provided<br />
<strong>in</strong> Annex-1 of this chapter (given after 55 tables of this chapter). Similar details on 244 matched cities are provided<br />
<strong>in</strong> Annex-2 of this chapter. Details of FDI manufactur<strong>in</strong>g plants located across the country are provided <strong>in</strong><br />
Annex-3 of this chapter.<br />
6.2.4 Service Firms’ Facilities<br />
FDI-enabled service firms are spread over 369 cities across India, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 311 (84 per cent) Class-3 cities (Table 6.17).<br />
Andhra Pradesh has the highest number of cities (126) with FDI-enabled service facilities; these <strong>in</strong>clude 121 Class-3<br />
cities. Karnataka has 76 cities with FDI-enabled service facilities, of which 73 cities are Class-3. Other states have<br />
significantly fewer cities <strong>in</strong> which FDI-enabled service facilities are located.<br />
<strong>Of</strong> a total of 1,257 FDI-enabled service facilities, 35 per cent are located <strong>in</strong> Class-3 cities. The state-wise share of FDIenabled<br />
service facilities located <strong>in</strong> Class-3 cities is 61 per cent <strong>in</strong> Andhra Pradesh; 43 per cent <strong>in</strong> Karnataka; 18 per cent<br />
<strong>in</strong> Tamil Nadu; <strong>and</strong> 3 per cent <strong>in</strong> Maharashtra (Table 6.18).<br />
6.3 Sectoral Details of FDI <strong>in</strong> Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g Sector<br />
The data of FDI firms/plants for more recent periods have been used to gauge the current economic performance of<br />
these firms/plants. The period April 2006 – March 2008 has been used as the period of current reference to cull the<br />
latest reported f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>and</strong> operative data. As mentioned earlier, Capital<strong>in</strong>e cannot report data for all firms at a<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle po<strong>in</strong>t of time, say March 2008, s<strong>in</strong>ce it receives f<strong>in</strong>ancial reports of the firms at different po<strong>in</strong>ts of time <strong>and</strong><br />
some firms may not have reported their latest figures. The cut-off dates, viz., April 2006 <strong>and</strong> March 2008 have been<br />
decided to <strong>in</strong>clude three consecutive years, viz., 2005-06 to 2007-08 to extract the latest available <strong>in</strong>formation on<br />
FDI manufactur<strong>in</strong>g firms <strong>and</strong> plants. This <strong>in</strong>formation has been used to study FDI agglomeration/cluster<strong>in</strong>g issues<br />
as well as other performance <strong>in</strong>dicators of firms <strong>and</strong> plants <strong>and</strong> NIC 3-digit sectors across states <strong>and</strong> cities. These<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>in</strong>clude market capitalisation, equity, net fixed capital, output, employment, value-added <strong>and</strong> outputcapital<br />
ratio <strong>and</strong> FDI sectoral <strong>in</strong>tensity. 7 FDI-specific <strong>in</strong>dicators have also been compared with the correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
domestic <strong>in</strong>dicators.<br />
6.3.1 Spread across States: Firms <strong>and</strong> Plants<br />
We were able to retrieve the latest <strong>in</strong>formation on 351 FDI firms with 1,171 plants spread over 275 cities, thus imply<strong>in</strong>g<br />
3.3 plants per firm on average. The correspond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation for domestic plants is available for 3,107 firms that have<br />
8,485 plants spread over 958 cities (Table 6.19).<br />
7. Net fixed capital has been taken as the book value reported <strong>in</strong> the balance sheets of the firms <strong>in</strong> our database.<br />
SECONDARY DATA-BASED ANALYSIS<br />
61