24.02.2013 Views

Read Back Signals in Magnetic Recording - Research Group Fidler

Read Back Signals in Magnetic Recording - Research Group Fidler

Read Back Signals in Magnetic Recording - Research Group Fidler

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Basics<br />

Nowadays there are aga<strong>in</strong> efforts to use perpendicular record<strong>in</strong>g because of the theoretical<br />

higher data density limit.<br />

2.9.1 Longitud<strong>in</strong>al Record<strong>in</strong>g<br />

The pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of longitud<strong>in</strong>al record<strong>in</strong>g is illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 2.8. For the writ<strong>in</strong>g process a<br />

r<strong>in</strong>g head is used, which generates a stray field at the gap above the record<strong>in</strong>g layer, so that it<br />

is magnetized <strong>in</strong> longitud<strong>in</strong>al direction. To retrieve the written <strong>in</strong>formation, the read head<br />

detects the stray field of the data layer, which has its maxima at the transitions of two opposite<br />

magnetized bits. In longitud<strong>in</strong>al record<strong>in</strong>g the read back signal is roughly proportional to the<br />

first derivation of the magnetization.<br />

Figure 2.8: A comparison of longitud<strong>in</strong>al record<strong>in</strong>g and perpendicular record<strong>in</strong>g [7].<br />

2.9.2 Perpendicular Record<strong>in</strong>g<br />

As shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 2.8 an additional soft magnetic underlayer is necessary for perpendicular<br />

record<strong>in</strong>g. This soft under layer (SUL) closes the magnetic circuit. The yoke of the write head<br />

has a small write pole, which bundles the flux to achieve high writ<strong>in</strong>g fields, and a wide return<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!