24.02.2013 Views

Read Back Signals in Magnetic Recording - Research Group Fidler

Read Back Signals in Magnetic Recording - Research Group Fidler

Read Back Signals in Magnetic Recording - Research Group Fidler

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction<br />

In 1955, before the RAMAC was announced, IBM decided to start the development of the<br />

next generation hard disks. The targets of the so called Advanced Disk File (ADF) project<br />

were a 10 times larger capacity and a 1/10 the access time compared to RAMAC. The faster<br />

access time could only be reached by us<strong>in</strong>g one head for each disk surface. It was clear that<br />

the uneconomic air pressure system had to be replaced by fly<strong>in</strong>g heads (air bear<strong>in</strong>g sliders).<br />

Fly<strong>in</strong>g heads allow a smaller head-disk spac<strong>in</strong>g, which f<strong>in</strong>ally allows higher l<strong>in</strong>ear data<br />

densities. The experiences of the RAMAC lead to the decision to use a harder media. They<br />

chose soft magnetic steel disks. Oxidiz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a steam atmosphere leads to a hard th<strong>in</strong> layer on<br />

their surface. In addition the manufactur<strong>in</strong>g costs were less than that of RAMAC’s alum<strong>in</strong>um<br />

disks.<br />

The project was very risky, because of lack<strong>in</strong>g knowledge about air bear<strong>in</strong>g heads and about<br />

perpendicular record<strong>in</strong>g. In 1960, due to several failures and major problems (e.g. the surface<br />

quality of the steel disks was unacceptable), IBM turned away from perpendicular record<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and towards longitud<strong>in</strong>al record<strong>in</strong>g. Due to major achievements <strong>in</strong> longitud<strong>in</strong>al record<strong>in</strong>g<br />

perpendicular record<strong>in</strong>g became un<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g for many decades.<br />

All magnetic storage devices were us<strong>in</strong>g coils to read out magnetic <strong>in</strong>formation. In 1971<br />

however, a new type of transducer us<strong>in</strong>g the anisotropy magneto-resistance effect (AMR) was<br />

reported by R. B. Hunt [5]. AMR heads generate larger read back signals than <strong>in</strong>ductive heads<br />

for common relative velocities between disk and head. Another advantage of AMR heads<br />

over <strong>in</strong>ductive heads is their lower resistance and <strong>in</strong>ductivity result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> lower Johnson noise.<br />

In 1991 the first commercial hard disks us<strong>in</strong>g AMR read heads were available and broke the<br />

100 Mbit/<strong>in</strong> 2 record<strong>in</strong>g density barrier.<br />

In 1988 Baibich et al. [6] discovered a new magneto-resistance effect. Due to its large change<br />

<strong>in</strong> resistance compared to AMR this effect was called Giant Magneto-Resistance (GMR).<br />

GMR read heads were first <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> commercial hard disks by IBM <strong>in</strong> 1997. The<br />

<strong>in</strong>vention of AMR and GMR read heads has accelerated the growth <strong>in</strong> data density (see Figure<br />

1.3).<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!