24.02.2013 Views

Read Back Signals in Magnetic Recording - Research Group Fidler

Read Back Signals in Magnetic Recording - Research Group Fidler

Read Back Signals in Magnetic Recording - Research Group Fidler

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

V<br />

2l + N2πr′ ≈ = 3.57 µV<br />

σrπ L<br />

2 2<br />

Numerical Methods<br />

(4.65)<br />

With the FEM we get V 2 = 3.81µV . The difference is aga<strong>in</strong> due to the smaller cross sectional<br />

area of the meshed model.<br />

H z (r=0) [A/m]<br />

0.20<br />

0.15<br />

0.10<br />

0.05<br />

0.00<br />

0<br />

-100 -50 0 50 100 150 200<br />

z [mm]<br />

Figure 4.4: The model of the coil (left). The color code shows the l<strong>in</strong>ear decrease of the<br />

electric potential <strong>in</strong>side the wire. The chart (right) shows the magnetic field of a solenoid <strong>in</strong><br />

z-direction at the middle axis. The two dotted l<strong>in</strong>es identify the position of the solenoid.<br />

The second graph shows the relative error of the coil’s magnetic field calculated with FEM<br />

calculation compared to the solenoid’s field.<br />

The magnetic field for a perfect solenoid (hollow cyl<strong>in</strong>der with <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itesimal th<strong>in</strong> nappe) with<br />

length L, face current density J and radius r′ can be calculated exactly along the middle axis<br />

(z-axis):<br />

⎛ ⎞<br />

J L−z z<br />

Hz( z)<br />

= ⋅ ⎜ + ⎟.<br />

(4.66)<br />

2 ⎜ 2 2 2 2<br />

( L− z) + r′<br />

z + r′<br />

⎟<br />

⎝ ⎠<br />

When we now approximate the coil by such a solenoid and set the face current density equal<br />

to<br />

NI<br />

J = , we have the possibility to compare the field of the solenoid H z with that of the<br />

L<br />

calculated field of our model. The run of the magnetic field along the middle axis of the<br />

solenoid is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.4. In addition the relative error of the FEM calculated coil<br />

compared with the solenoid is given. So the quantitative values are aga<strong>in</strong> consistent.<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Error [%]<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!