25.02.2013 Views

The United Kingdom and Human Rights - College of Social ...

The United Kingdom and Human Rights - College of Social ...

The United Kingdom and Human Rights - College of Social ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 <strong>The</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> Thinking<br />

thinking just as human rights conceptions were about to<br />

be given pride <strong>of</strong> place in European constitutions.<br />

Scottish <strong>and</strong> English writers influenced Montesquieu<br />

(1689-1755), who pointed to the plurality <strong>of</strong> cultures <strong>and</strong><br />

the relativity <strong>of</strong> morality to each culture. Awareness <strong>of</strong><br />

the fact that for each alleged universal right there was<br />

some society which failed to recognise it had the result<br />

<strong>of</strong> turning most thinkers into cultural relativists. But the<br />

most devastating impact on Natural Law <strong>and</strong> human<br />

rights thinking had been made before Montesquieu's<br />

writings, by the Scots philosopher, David Hume (1711-<br />

1776), who destroyed pretensions <strong>of</strong> Natural Law to<br />

scientific validity. Building on earlier British <strong>and</strong> French<br />

thinkers about human psychology, as well as on<br />

Aristotle <strong>and</strong> Cicero, Hume demonstrated the absence <strong>of</strong><br />

rational grounds or <strong>of</strong> necessity for our moral beliefs,<br />

which rest on habit <strong>and</strong> association. Values, Hume<br />

argued, depend upon human propensities, <strong>and</strong> they<br />

may or may not be generally approved—except by "the<br />

moral majority." Morality, he urged, was socially<br />

constructed <strong>and</strong> could not be demonstrated to be<br />

scientifically true. Nor could any particular society's<br />

moral code be logically demonstrated to be better than<br />

another. Despite the titanic endeavours <strong>of</strong> various<br />

godless gatherings <strong>of</strong> philosophers for the next two<br />

hundred <strong>and</strong> fifty years, they have, although providing<br />

justificatory arguments, failed to re-establish the dreams<br />

that once existed <strong>of</strong> Natural Law <strong>and</strong> natural rights. 7<br />

Hume's logic did not entail that we cannot continue to<br />

reason about values. Quite the reverse. What he showed<br />

was that the soundness <strong>of</strong> reasoning has primarily to be<br />

adjudged on the basis that it is shared by the majority <strong>of</strong><br />

the reasoner's particular community, which habitually<br />

shares responses. Indeed, he believed it impossible to<br />

maintain a society <strong>of</strong> any kind without justice—a view <strong>of</strong><br />

which would have been constructed by the community.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!