25.02.2013 Views

The United Kingdom and Human Rights - College of Social ...

The United Kingdom and Human Rights - College of Social ...

The United Kingdom and Human Rights - College of Social ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 <strong>The</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> Thinking<br />

merely expressing a preference acquired in the course <strong>of</strong><br />

socialisation. He considers himself to be averring the<br />

truth <strong>and</strong> seeks to persuade others to adopt his beliefs.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are two kinds <strong>of</strong> relativism which make it<br />

unscientific to argue that beliefs in human rights are<br />

true. Firstly, descriptive relativists argue that anthropological<br />

studies show that the basic ethical beliefs <strong>of</strong><br />

different societies in fact differ <strong>and</strong> even conflict. Metaethical<br />

relativists go further <strong>and</strong> assert that there is no<br />

objectively valid rational way <strong>of</strong> justifying one basic<br />

ethical belief, judgment, value, or right consequent on a<br />

value as opposed to another. Thus, two conflicting basic<br />

judgments may be equally valid, or at least neither case<br />

can be proved to be valid or more valid than the other.<br />

In the event, the world's current ecumenical approach to<br />

human rights rests only on tentative philosophical<br />

argumentation, assertions made in the course <strong>of</strong> international<br />

relations, laws created by international treaties <strong>and</strong><br />

the discourse <strong>of</strong> laymen in those societies where the<br />

rights <strong>of</strong> men have become an accepted notion in the<br />

culture.<br />

Some Third World political thinkers, whose national<br />

movements, during the phase <strong>of</strong> their anti-colonialist<br />

struggles, invoked human rights, particularly the right to<br />

self-determination, the people's counterpart <strong>of</strong> personal<br />

autonomy, now dismiss the view that implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

the international human rights' moral code is an<br />

enterprise for the whole human species by virtue <strong>of</strong> each<br />

person's humanness <strong>and</strong> claims to autonomy. Instead,<br />

they rely on relativism as between societies <strong>and</strong> different<br />

cultural traditions to criticise civil <strong>and</strong> political rights as<br />

manifestations <strong>of</strong> Eurocentricity or <strong>of</strong> western cultural<br />

imperialism. Others, including apologists for fundamentalists<br />

<strong>and</strong> some moral philosophers, do not consider any<br />

discourse to be possible between different cultural<br />

traditions, because no universal st<strong>and</strong>ards are possible. 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!