01.03.2013 Views

downloaded

downloaded

downloaded

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IV<br />

Executive summary<br />

the family farms plan to continue at a (semi-)subsistence level or as hobby<br />

farmers. This means that in the medium-term these farms will be relatively<br />

insensitive to policy measures directed towards structural change.<br />

Expectations from EU accession. The attitudes of Croatian farmers towards the<br />

anticipated EU accession are largely negative. There are very few positive aspects,<br />

such as law and order that are expected. Among the negative aspects, the one<br />

most frequently mentioned was that farmers consider EU regulations as a threat to<br />

the survival of their farms. Farmers also fear the prospect of becoming<br />

uncompetitive due to open markets and their small-scale farming structure. These<br />

fears, however, do not prompt the Croatian farmers to apply for the Instrument<br />

for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA), which co-finances farm investments and<br />

investments to upgrade community standards. The Slovenian example shows<br />

that the opinion towards the EU and its agricultural policy could improve as soon<br />

as the (financial) benefits become obvious to the farmers. Therefore, the negative<br />

attitude could also be seen as a sign of lacking information.<br />

Policies versus politics in the negotiation process of the Agricultural Chapter.<br />

One general important lesson from the Slovenian accession experience is that<br />

the harmonisation of legislation is not only an issue of adopting the relevant<br />

laws and regulations. It is also about the harmonisation of administration and<br />

policies. Although the EU clearly carries more weight in the negotiation when it<br />

comes to influencing the content of the Agricultural Chapter, it is important that<br />

the national interest groups formulate their policy objectives very clearly, set aside<br />

national political concerns, and act in concert. Consequently, the negotiation team<br />

must have a common strategy and rely on the same background information for<br />

the negotiations.<br />

Policy pointers<br />

The following summarises the policy recommendations derived from the above<br />

findings.<br />

Recommendation 1:<br />

Balanced structural change in agriculture<br />

Agricultural sector measures and in particular agricultural subsidies alone<br />

should not constitute the public policy portfolio for rural regions. In Croatia this<br />

is recognised, but traditional sector measures still play an important role. Smallscale<br />

farm structures lacking the prospect of future prosperity are the main

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!