01.03.2013 Views

Improving Kenya's Domestic Horticultural Production and Marketing

Improving Kenya's Domestic Horticultural Production and Marketing

Improving Kenya's Domestic Horticultural Production and Marketing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

groups: households that did not produce any horticultural crops, households that produced but<br />

did not sell, <strong>and</strong> five groups of equal size (quintiles) among those that did sell horticultural<br />

produce, ranging from those that sold the least (quintile 1) to those that sold the most<br />

(quintile 5). Results suggest that horticultural sales are highly concentrated in Kenya. Only<br />

3% of households in the sample did not produce any horticultural crops <strong>and</strong> therefore also did<br />

not sell, but over 20% of those that did produce did not sell any. Among those that did sell,<br />

one-fifth (15% of the total population) sold extremely small amounts – only Ksh 234 on<br />

average. Nearly 80% of the total value of horticultural sales among all households was<br />

accounted for by the largest 20% of all sellers, who represent only 15% of the total<br />

population.<br />

Table 3.5 Income shares by geographical area in selected areas of Kenya<br />

Geographical Area Cereals, tubers, <strong>Horticultural</strong> IndusLive- In-formal Salary Total Total<br />

pulses crops trial crop stock off-farm <strong>and</strong> (%) (Ksh<br />

Retained Sold Retained Sold sales (wages+ Remit- per<br />

business) tances capita)<br />

Coastal Lowl<strong>and</strong>s 19.7 1.6 11.5 4.1 0.0 3.2 37.3 22.6 100 13,493<br />

Eastern Lowl<strong>and</strong>s 18.9 2.9 10.2 8.4 0.7 12.7 20.5 25.6 100 17,006<br />

Western Lowl<strong>and</strong>s 17.4 3.8 6.6 3.7 4.7 22.7 18.5 22.6 100 7,321<br />

Western Transitional 15.7 4.5 5.8 5.0 33.2 7.3 16.0 12.5 100 17,865<br />

High Pot’ Maize Zone 13.4 14.3 3.8 3.6 3.9 26.1 19.1 15.8 100 20,847<br />

Western Highl<strong>and</strong>s 20.8 3.4 12.4 13.9 16.0 6.6 8.3 18.6 100 12,716<br />

Central Highl<strong>and</strong>s 8.2 3.5 0.5 6.9 29.1 23.9 12.2 16.7 101 28,501<br />

Table 3.6. Concentration of horticultural sales: percent of total sales by quintiles of total<br />

household horticultural sales value<br />

Sales category % of<br />

farmers<br />

Average value of<br />

horticultural<br />

production per hh<br />

(Ksh)<br />

20<br />

% of total<br />

prodn in<br />

sample<br />

Average value<br />

of horticultural<br />

sales per hh<br />

(Ksh)<br />

% of total<br />

sales in<br />

sample<br />

No production 3.2 — — — ---<br />

<strong>Production</strong>, no sales 21.2 3,911 5% 0 0%<br />

1 Lowest sales 15.1 3,475 3% 234 0%<br />

2 15.1 5,927 6% 1,112 2%<br />

3 15.2 8,953 9% 2,807 5%<br />

4 15.1 15,496 15% 7,850 14%<br />

5 Highest sales 15.1 61,995 61% 43,980 79%<br />

Table 3.7 examines how these households are distributed across our seven zones. We see<br />

that Western Lowl<strong>and</strong>s has by far the highest proportion of non-producers, <strong>and</strong> that it along<br />

with Coastal Lowl<strong>and</strong>s has the highest proportion of non-sellers <strong>and</strong> the lowest proportion of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!