04.03.2013 Views

SONIC THE HEDGEHOG – STILL UNSTOPPABLE! - Kazachok

SONIC THE HEDGEHOG – STILL UNSTOPPABLE! - Kazachok

SONIC THE HEDGEHOG – STILL UNSTOPPABLE! - Kazachok

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

International<br />

law<br />

Securing Your<br />

Revenue Stream<br />

establish control oriented processes to<br />

capture the right amount, from the right<br />

database, at the right time, there are<br />

good chances that some royalties will be<br />

missing.<br />

As a matter of fact, it is understandable<br />

that there is a serious gap between<br />

contract requirements and Licensee’s<br />

business practices. And sadly with<br />

regards to royalties, the amount to be<br />

reported to the Licensor does not match<br />

with the reported one.<br />

Business case:<br />

Unreported articles<br />

Let’s take an example of a textile Licensee.<br />

There are 2 collections a year. Per<br />

collection, licensee offers 10 designs.<br />

Also, 4 colors and 4 sizes are available<br />

and licensee distributes products through<br />

3 different assortments. In total, licensee<br />

will create approximately 1000 article<br />

references! Most importantly, Licensee<br />

must include such articles when capturing<br />

royalties quarterly.<br />

So the big question seems to be who is<br />

<strong>THE</strong> BEACH FACTORY S.L.<br />

Avd. Generalitat, s/n par.42<br />

43480 Vila-seca (Tarragona) SPAIN<br />

Tel. (+34) 977 393 794<br />

comercial@thebeachfactory.com<br />

doing what? And when? In fact, the real<br />

question is not what has to be done - since<br />

teams / internal stakeholder’s know the<br />

solutions <strong>–</strong> but rather, the question is who<br />

is doing it?<br />

In the textile example here before, the<br />

licensee forgot to capture half of the new<br />

article references. The reason for that<br />

is that designers in charge of creating<br />

articles were not communicating effectively<br />

any new article created to I.T. and<br />

Accounting department.<br />

In addition, a trainee was in charge of<br />

running a royalty report quarterly by pressing<br />

the F12 button. This is interesting<br />

Some simple practices<br />

By experience, here is a couple of advises<br />

we would like to share with both Licensors<br />

and Licensees.<br />

1. We encourage Licensing companies to<br />

be proactive in defining License terms and<br />

expectations. Weak definitions are subject<br />

to confusion,<br />

but what’s behind F12? Where is the data<br />

coming from? Is the I.T. query complete?<br />

How do we make sure new article created<br />

is effectively taken over in the quarterly<br />

royalty declaration? Who does control the<br />

royalty declaration before sending to the<br />

Licensor ? And so on…<br />

All in all, 40% findings raised are unreported<br />

royalties. So unless you go on site<br />

to ask questions and check records, you<br />

would never know whether something<br />

could be missing from your declarations.<br />

Again, it has nothing to do with cheating, it<br />

is making mistakes.<br />

2. Licensing companies shall educate /<br />

communicate to licensees early on what is<br />

expected and acceptable from a reporting<br />

perspective,<br />

3. Licensee should read what they sign<br />

and check what they send quarterly.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!