SONIC THE HEDGEHOG – STILL UNSTOPPABLE! - Kazachok
SONIC THE HEDGEHOG – STILL UNSTOPPABLE! - Kazachok
SONIC THE HEDGEHOG – STILL UNSTOPPABLE! - Kazachok
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
International<br />
law<br />
Securing Your<br />
Revenue Stream<br />
establish control oriented processes to<br />
capture the right amount, from the right<br />
database, at the right time, there are<br />
good chances that some royalties will be<br />
missing.<br />
As a matter of fact, it is understandable<br />
that there is a serious gap between<br />
contract requirements and Licensee’s<br />
business practices. And sadly with<br />
regards to royalties, the amount to be<br />
reported to the Licensor does not match<br />
with the reported one.<br />
Business case:<br />
Unreported articles<br />
Let’s take an example of a textile Licensee.<br />
There are 2 collections a year. Per<br />
collection, licensee offers 10 designs.<br />
Also, 4 colors and 4 sizes are available<br />
and licensee distributes products through<br />
3 different assortments. In total, licensee<br />
will create approximately 1000 article<br />
references! Most importantly, Licensee<br />
must include such articles when capturing<br />
royalties quarterly.<br />
So the big question seems to be who is<br />
<strong>THE</strong> BEACH FACTORY S.L.<br />
Avd. Generalitat, s/n par.42<br />
43480 Vila-seca (Tarragona) SPAIN<br />
Tel. (+34) 977 393 794<br />
comercial@thebeachfactory.com<br />
doing what? And when? In fact, the real<br />
question is not what has to be done - since<br />
teams / internal stakeholder’s know the<br />
solutions <strong>–</strong> but rather, the question is who<br />
is doing it?<br />
In the textile example here before, the<br />
licensee forgot to capture half of the new<br />
article references. The reason for that<br />
is that designers in charge of creating<br />
articles were not communicating effectively<br />
any new article created to I.T. and<br />
Accounting department.<br />
In addition, a trainee was in charge of<br />
running a royalty report quarterly by pressing<br />
the F12 button. This is interesting<br />
Some simple practices<br />
By experience, here is a couple of advises<br />
we would like to share with both Licensors<br />
and Licensees.<br />
1. We encourage Licensing companies to<br />
be proactive in defining License terms and<br />
expectations. Weak definitions are subject<br />
to confusion,<br />
but what’s behind F12? Where is the data<br />
coming from? Is the I.T. query complete?<br />
How do we make sure new article created<br />
is effectively taken over in the quarterly<br />
royalty declaration? Who does control the<br />
royalty declaration before sending to the<br />
Licensor ? And so on…<br />
All in all, 40% findings raised are unreported<br />
royalties. So unless you go on site<br />
to ask questions and check records, you<br />
would never know whether something<br />
could be missing from your declarations.<br />
Again, it has nothing to do with cheating, it<br />
is making mistakes.<br />
2. Licensing companies shall educate /<br />
communicate to licensees early on what is<br />
expected and acceptable from a reporting<br />
perspective,<br />
3. Licensee should read what they sign<br />
and check what they send quarterly.