04.03.2013 Views

Journal October 2007 Term - Supreme Court of the United States

Journal October 2007 Term - Supreme Court of the United States

Journal October 2007 Term - Supreme Court of the United States

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JNL07$0104—01-07-08 13:54:47 JOURNAPGT MILES<br />

(JOURNAL) FRIDAY, JANUARY 4, 2008 415<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES<br />

Present: Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Stevens, Justice Scalia, Justice<br />

Kennedy, Justice Souter, Justice Thomas, Justice Ginsburg, Justice<br />

Breyer, and Justice Alito.<br />

Orders in Pending Cases<br />

No. 06–1082. Virginia, Petitioner v. David Lee Moore. Motion <strong>of</strong><br />

American Bar Association for leave to participate in oral argument as<br />

amicus curiae and for divided argument denied.<br />

No. 07–21. William Crawford, et al., Petitioners v. Marion County<br />

Election Board, et al.; and<br />

No. 07–25. Indiana Democratic Party, et al., Petitioners v. Todd Rokita,<br />

Indiana Secretary <strong>of</strong> State, et al. Motion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Solicitor General<br />

for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for<br />

divided argument granted.<br />

No. 07–5439. Ralph Baze and Thomas C. Bowling, Petitioners v. John<br />

D. Rees, Commissioner, Kentucky Department <strong>of</strong> Corrections, et al.<br />

Motion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument<br />

as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.<br />

Certiorari Granted<br />

No. 06–7517. Richard Irizarry, Petitioner v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>. Motion<br />

<strong>of</strong> petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition<br />

for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals for <strong>the</strong><br />

Eleventh Circuit granted. Brief <strong>of</strong> petitioner to be filed on or before<br />

Thursday, February 14, 2008. Brief <strong>of</strong> respondent to be filed on or before<br />

Wednesday, March 12, 2008. Reply brief, if any, to be filed in accordance<br />

with Rule 25.3 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rules <strong>of</strong> this <strong>Court</strong>.<br />

No. 07–210. John Bridge, et al., Petitioners v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity<br />

Co., et al. Petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong><br />

<strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals for <strong>the</strong> Seventh Circuit granted limited to <strong>the</strong> following<br />

question: “Whe<strong>the</strong>r reliance is a required element <strong>of</strong> a RICO claim<br />

predicated on mail fraud and, if it is, whe<strong>the</strong>r that reliance must be by<br />

<strong>the</strong> plaintiff.” Brief <strong>of</strong> petitioners to be filed on or before Thursday,<br />

February 14, 2008. Brief <strong>of</strong> respondents to be filed on or before<br />

Wednesday, March 12, 2008. Reply brief, if any, to be filed in accordance<br />

with Rule 25.3 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rules <strong>of</strong> this <strong>Court</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!