04.03.2013 Views

Journal October 2007 Term - Supreme Court of the United States

Journal October 2007 Term - Supreme Court of the United States

Journal October 2007 Term - Supreme Court of the United States

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

JNL07$0122—09-16-08 16:25:07 JOURNAPGT MILES<br />

TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2008<br />

541<br />

Circuit for fur<strong>the</strong>r consideration in light <strong>of</strong> Kimbrough v. <strong>United</strong><br />

<strong>States</strong>, 552 U. S. ––– (<strong>2007</strong>).<br />

No. 07–8066. Krishnaswami Sriram, Petitioner v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>. On<br />

petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals for<br />

<strong>the</strong> Seventh Circuit. Motion <strong>of</strong> petitioner for leave to proceed in forma<br />

pauperis and petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari granted. Judgment vacated,<br />

and case remanded to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals for <strong>the</strong> Seventh<br />

Circuit for fur<strong>the</strong>r consideration in light <strong>of</strong> Gall v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>,<br />

552 U. S. ––– (<strong>2007</strong>).<br />

No. 07–8150. Cornelius G. Williams, Petitioner v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>. On<br />

petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals for<br />

<strong>the</strong> Fourth Circuit. Motion <strong>of</strong> petitioner for leave to proceed in forma<br />

pauperis and petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari granted. Judgment vacated,<br />

and case remanded to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals for <strong>the</strong><br />

Fourth Circuit for fur<strong>the</strong>r consideration in light <strong>of</strong> Kimbrough v.<br />

<strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>, 552 U. S. ––– (<strong>2007</strong>).<br />

Orders in Pending Cases<br />

No. 06–1431. CBOCS West, Inc., Petitioner v. Hedrick G. Humphries.<br />

Motion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral<br />

argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.<br />

No. 06–1457. Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc., Petitioner v. Public<br />

Utility District No. 1 <strong>of</strong> Snohomish County, Washington, et al.; and<br />

No. 06–1462. Calpine Energy Services, L. P., et al., Petitioners v.<br />

Public Utility District No. 1 <strong>of</strong> Snohomish County, Washington, et al.<br />

Motion <strong>of</strong> respondent Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for divided<br />

argument granted. The Chief Justice and Justice Breyer took no<br />

part in <strong>the</strong> consideration or decision <strong>of</strong> this motion.<br />

No. 06–1498. Warner-Lambert Co., LLC, et al., Petitioners v.<br />

Kimberly Kent, et al. Motion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Solicitor General for leave to participate<br />

in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument<br />

granted. Motion <strong>of</strong> Kansas, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument<br />

as amici curiae and for divided argument denied. The Chief Justice<br />

took no part in <strong>the</strong> consideration or decision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se motions.<br />

No. 07–440. Walter A. Rothgery, Petitioner v. Gillespie County,<br />

Texas. Motion <strong>of</strong> petitioner to dispense with printing <strong>the</strong> joint appendix<br />

granted.<br />

No. 07–512. Pacific Bell Telephone Company, dba AT&T California,<br />

et al., Petitioners v. linkLine Communications, Inc., et al. The Solicitor

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!