04.03.2013 Views

Journal October 2007 Term - Supreme Court of the United States

Journal October 2007 Term - Supreme Court of the United States

Journal October 2007 Term - Supreme Court of the United States

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JNL07$0616—06-25-08 12:04:57 JOURNAPGT MILES<br />

(JOURNAL) MONDAY, JUNE 16, 2008 987<br />

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES<br />

Present: Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Stevens, Justice Scalia, Justice<br />

Souter, Justice Thomas, Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, and Justice<br />

Alito.<br />

The Chief Justice said:<br />

“Today’s orders <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Court</strong> have been duly entered and certified,<br />

and filed with <strong>the</strong> Clerk, and <strong>the</strong>y will not be o<strong>the</strong>rwise announced.”<br />

Certiorari—Summary Dispositions<br />

No. 07–1283. Paul Brown, et al., Petitioners v. Cassens Transport<br />

Co., et al. On petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Appeals for <strong>the</strong> Sixth Circuit. Petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari granted.<br />

Judgment vacated, and case remanded to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Appeals for <strong>the</strong> Sixth Circuit for fur<strong>the</strong>r consideration in light <strong>of</strong><br />

Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co., 553 U. S. ––– (2008).<br />

No. 07–9713. Alfonso Lopez-Morales, Petitioner v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>. On<br />

petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Fifth Circuit. Motion <strong>of</strong> petitioner for leave to proceed in forma<br />

pauperis and petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari granted. Judgment vacated,<br />

and case remanded to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals for <strong>the</strong> Fifth<br />

Circuit for fur<strong>the</strong>r consideration in light <strong>of</strong> Gall v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>, 552<br />

U. S. ––– (<strong>2007</strong>).<br />

No. 07–9769. Pedro Jaimes-Aguirre, Petitioner v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>. On<br />

petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Fifth Circuit. Motion <strong>of</strong> petitioner for leave to proceed in forma<br />

pauperis and petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari granted. Judgment vacated,<br />

and case remanded to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals for <strong>the</strong> Fifth<br />

Circuit for fur<strong>the</strong>r consideration in light <strong>of</strong> Gall v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>, 552<br />

U. S. ––– (<strong>2007</strong>).<br />

No. 07–9855. Pedro Salazar-Garcia, Petitioner v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>. On<br />

petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals<br />

for <strong>the</strong> Fifth Circuit. Motion <strong>of</strong> petitioner for leave to proceed in forma<br />

pauperis and petition for writ <strong>of</strong> certiorari granted. Judgment vacated,<br />

and case remanded to <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals for <strong>the</strong> Fifth<br />

Circuit for fur<strong>the</strong>r consideration in light <strong>of</strong> Gall v. <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>, 552<br />

U. S. ––– (<strong>2007</strong>).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!