06.03.2013 Views

Teaching and Assessing Soft Skills - MASS - Measuring and ...

Teaching and Assessing Soft Skills - MASS - Measuring and ...

Teaching and Assessing Soft Skills - MASS - Measuring and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Country<br />

UK - 1<br />

UK - 2<br />

UK - 3<br />

Table 9<br />

Students’ quality of life indices<br />

Living conditions<br />

Living environment Crime <strong>and</strong> harm<br />

Ranges from third<br />

generation<br />

unemployed to<br />

financially<br />

comfortable <strong>and</strong><br />

secure.<br />

GR Unknown<br />

SW<br />

With families or<br />

cohabiting.<br />

Criminal record for<br />

10% of students<br />

No criminal<br />

records.<br />

Some criminal<br />

records.<br />

RO Live with families. No criminal records<br />

NL - 1<br />

NL - 2<br />

Table 8 <strong>and</strong><br />

Low quality<br />

A lot have criminal<br />

records.<br />

10% with criminal<br />

records<br />

Table 9 contain information related to students’ quality of life.<br />

Drug abuse (including<br />

alcohol)<br />

20% of students (rough<br />

approximation). 6% with<br />

alcoholic parents or<br />

siblings.<br />

None<br />

Some drug abuse<br />

50% occasional users. 10%<br />

with alcoholic parents.<br />

50% alcoholic<br />

Unknown<br />

As we analyse earlier in this paper, SkillZone’s students are disadvantaged ones. The <strong>MASS</strong><br />

project had a double target: on one h<strong>and</strong> social inclusion of disaffected young people <strong>and</strong> on<br />

the other enhancement of their employability qualifications. These two targets are<br />

complementary; however emphasis to one of them may be given, according to<br />

characteristics <strong>and</strong> degree of disadvantage of each group.<br />

In this context it is useful to examine some indices which may characterize the<br />

disadvantaged state of each group (Bradbrook et al., 2008, p. 17).<br />

The Swedish institution’s data collection policies differ from the other groups so their<br />

information is not included here.<br />

Poverty <strong>and</strong> access to material resources is the dominant reason for disadvantage<br />

(Bradbrook et al., 2008). UK, GR <strong>and</strong> RO reported that their students are below or close to<br />

the official levels of poverty in each country. This is a strong indication that the target groups<br />

are disadvantaged ones. NL reports that their financial state of their target group is<br />

“adequate”.<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!