08.03.2013 Views

Koontz, J., D.G. Huggins, C.C. Freeman, D.S. Baker - Central Plains ...

Koontz, J., D.G. Huggins, C.C. Freeman, D.S. Baker - Central Plains ...

Koontz, J., D.G. Huggins, C.C. Freeman, D.S. Baker - Central Plains ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Evidence that waterfowl and/or amphibians are present or would be present during the migratory<br />

season, suggests the wetland is capable of providing wildlife habitat, including food and nesting<br />

cover.<br />

Endangered or Threatened Species warrant further protection of the area under federal laws and<br />

would thus generally discourage disturbance.<br />

Interspersion (Mack 2001) refers to natural non-uniformity in wetland habitat design. Some<br />

native wetland species require multiple habitat-types. If these habitat-types are not in close<br />

proximity to one another, or interspersed throughout the wetland area, then it may be difficult for<br />

such species to survive. The assumption is that between two wetlands of the same size and with<br />

the same proportions of open-water to vegetated habitat, the one exhibiting the greatest<br />

interspersion of habitats likely will support greater native wetland biodiversity and will be more<br />

similar to a „reference‟ state.<br />

Connectivity refers to a wetland‟s functional and structural connection to other landscape and<br />

hydrologic features. Features that disrupt connectivity, such as river or stream impoundments,<br />

levees, berms, or other water structures, can be easily identified on a local level and indicate<br />

disruptions to historical hydrologic regimes. It is more difficult to assess broad-scale and<br />

cumulative hydrological impacts to floodplain wetlands since at some scale nearly all floodplains<br />

and riverine systems have become hydrologically altered to some degree. This assumes most<br />

floodplain wetlands were originally connected to the river or that water was able to cycle<br />

between these systems intermittently.<br />

Disturbance<br />

Metrics that indicate human disturbances known to degrade wetland health are listed in this<br />

section of the Disturbance Assessment. For each disturbance a point is subtracted. If the<br />

disturbance is unusually severe or at a high rate of occurrence, then more than one point can be<br />

subtracted.<br />

Sedimentation is a natural process for wetlands in the Missouri River floodplain, however<br />

modern land use changes that affect the spatial and temporal extent of permanent ground cover<br />

can accelerate soil loss and increased sedimentation (observed as plumes or fresh deposits within<br />

wetlands) that dramatically affect the structure and function of wetlands. Scoring the extent of<br />

wetland sedimentation is not dependant on the identification of anthropogenic or natural causes.<br />

Upland soil disturbance or tillage in the immediate area drained by the wetland is scored<br />

separately as a local disturbance that demonstrates the potential for excessive sedimentation,<br />

although it may not be observable at the time of evaluation.<br />

The presence of cattle is not considered a natural occurrence, even in circumstances where the<br />

cattle graze the wetland periodically throughout the year.<br />

Excessive algae usually suggest an imbalance within an aquatic ecosystem (i.e. excessive<br />

nutrients or eutrophication). Regardless of whether the cause is fertilizer run-off, sediment<br />

resuspension, or cattle, the presence of excessive algae can impede the growth of<br />

aquatic/emergent plant life and threatens the survival of some aquatic organisms.<br />

13 of 84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!