Koontz, J., D.G. Huggins, C.C. Freeman, D.S. Baker - Central Plains ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Fennessy, M.S., A.D. Jacobs, and M.E. Kentula. 2007. An Evaluation of Rapid Methods for Assessing the Ecological Condition of Wetlands. Wetlands 27:543-560. Fennessy, M.S, A.D. Jacobs, and M.E. Kentula. 2004. Review of Rapid Methods for Assessing Wetland Condition. EPA/620/R-04/009, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC. Hintze, J.L. 2004. Number Cruncher Statistical System: Kaysville, UT. Huggins, D.G. and M.F. Moffett. 1988. Proposed biotic and habitat indices for use in Kansas streams. Open-file Report No. 35. Kansas Biological Survey, Lawrence, KS. 128 pp. Innis, S.A., R.J. Naiman, S.R. Elliott. 2000. Indicators and assessment methods for measuring the ecological integrity of semi-aquatic terrestrial environments. Hydrobiologia 422/423: 111-131. Kastens, J. H. 2008. Some New Developments on Two Separate Topics: Statistical Cross Validation and Floodplain Mapping. PhD Dissertation, Dept. of Mathematics, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS. 191pp. Kriz, J., D. Huggins, C. Freeman, J. Kastens. 2007. Assessment of Floodplain Wetlands of the Lower Missouri River Using a Reference-based Study Approach. Open-file Report No. 142. Kansas Biological Survey, Lawrence, KS. 63pp. Mack, J.J. 2001. Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands, Manual for Using Version 5.0. In D. o. S. W. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, 401 Wetland Ecology Unit, Columbus, Ohio [ed.], Ohio EPA Technical Bulletin Wetland/2001-1-1. Merritt, R.W., K.W. Cummins, and M.D. Berg. 2008. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. Kendall Hunt Publishing Co., Dubuque, IA. Minns, C.K., V.W. Cairns, R.G. Randall, and J.E. Moore. 1994. An index of biotic integrity (IBI) for fish assemblages in the littoral zone of Great Lakes' areas of concern. Can. J. of Fish. and Aquat. Sci. 51:1804-1822. Mitsch, W.J., X. Wu, R.W. Nairn, P.E. Weihe, N. Wang, R. Deal, and C.E. Boucher. 1998. Creating and Restoring Wetlands: A whole-ecosystem experiment in self-design. BioScience 48. Moshiri, G. 1993. Constructed Wetlands for Water Quality Improvement. Boca Raton, FL. CRC Press, Inc. 632pp. Slater, A. 1985. ECOMEAS 1.6. Kansas Biological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS. 76 of 84
Smith, L.M., N.H. Euliss, D.A. Wilcox, and M.M. Brinson. 2008. Application of geometric and temporal perspective to wetland management in North America. Wetlands 28:563 -577. Stoddard, J.L, A.T. Herlihy, D.V. Peck, R.M. Hughes, T.R. Whittier, E. Tarquinio. 2008. A process for creating multimetric indices for large-scale aquatic surveys. J. of North American Benthological Society 27:878-891. Sutula, M.A., E.D. Stein, J.N. Collins, A.E, Fetscher, and R. Clark. 2006. A practical guide for the development of a wetland assessment method: the California experience. Journal of the American Water Resources Association; Feb.:157-175. Thorp, J.H. and A.P. Covich 2001. Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, 2 nd Ed. Academic Press, USA. 1056pp. Thurman, E.M., M. Meyer, M. Pomes, C.A. Perry and A.P. Schwab. 1990. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay compared with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for the determination of triazine herbicides in water. Analytical Chemistry 62:2043-2048. 77 of 84
Page 1 and 2:
Assessment of Floodplain Wetlands o
Page 3 and 4:
Nitrogen ..........................
Page 5 and 6:
Executive Summary This project soug
Page 7 and 8:
other wetland parameters and assess
Page 9 and 10:
quality of plant community, respect
Page 11 and 12:
was inevitable, but care was taken
Page 13 and 14:
Evidence that waterfowl and/or amph
Page 15 and 16:
Floristic Quality Assessments Flori
Page 17 and 18:
FQAI ALL 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Figure
Page 19 and 20:
MEAN CONSERVATISM ALL 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
Page 21 and 22:
Mean Conductivity mS/cm 0.6 0.5 0.4
Page 23 and 24:
Table 7). The wide range of values
Page 25 and 26: Nitrogen - N mg/L Total Nitrogen mg
Page 27 and 28: N:P ratio 30.0 24.0 18.0 12.0 6.0 0
Page 29 and 30: Chlorophyll a ug/L 200 180 160 140
Page 31 and 32: wetlands, respectively. Macroinvert
Page 33 and 34: from analysis did not show signific
Page 35 and 36: major wetland classes when ANOVA an
Page 37 and 38: measurement. There are sites within
Page 39 and 40: measurements, turbidity was conside
Page 41 and 42: TOC mg/L TOC mg/L 16 14 12 10 8 6 4
Page 43 and 44: Nitrate:Ammonia Ratio Phase II Tota
Page 45 and 46: CDF 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10
Page 47 and 48: was true for organic nitrogen (R 2
Page 49 and 50: Figure 34. Error bar plots of mean
Page 51 and 52: and deethylatrazine were both prese
Page 53 and 54: suspected that differences in sampl
Page 55 and 56: Figure 38. Cumulative distribution
Page 57 and 58: Table 11. Metrics used in the devel
Page 59 and 60: tested: Percent Clingers (+) (p=0.0
Page 61 and 62: CDF Figure 42. Cumulative distribut
Page 63 and 64: Total Nitrogen mg/L Mean Conductivi
Page 65 and 66: Percent Hydroptilidae = 1.463766 +
Page 67 and 68: Table 14. Descriptive statistics fo
Page 69 and 70: MMI Scores 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30
Page 71 and 72: ecoregions. Mean pH was also found
Page 73 and 74: MMI Scores UB Wetland Type MMI Scor
Page 75: Acknowledgements Field crew members
Page 79 and 80: a. Land and soils coverage maps. b.
Page 81 and 82: Code Phase Longitude Latitude Site
Page 83 and 84: Appendix C. Laboratory measurements
show all

Koontz, J., D.G. Huggins, C.C. Freeman, D.S. Baker - Central Plains ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?