08.03.2013 Views

Koontz, J., D.G. Huggins, C.C. Freeman, D.S. Baker - Central Plains ...

Koontz, J., D.G. Huggins, C.C. Freeman, D.S. Baker - Central Plains ...

Koontz, J., D.G. Huggins, C.C. Freeman, D.S. Baker - Central Plains ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a priori Groups and Metric Selection<br />

The stressor-response metrics were selected using a Pearson correlation matrix (i.e. Pearson<br />

product-moment correlation coefficient) and linear regression test, except no single reference or<br />

random group was established a priori. In this study, a priori „high‟ and „low‟ groups were<br />

established for parameters that showed consistent significant responses to multiple<br />

macroinvertebrate metrics using the 25 th and 75 th percentile, since significant variability in<br />

response existed among landscape, plant community, and water quality measures.<br />

Macroinvertebrate metrics were placed in a correlation matrix along with floristic quality<br />

measures, water quality parameters, and surrogate spatial and temporal variables. All significant<br />

(p ≤ 0.05) Pearson correlations were tested with linear regression and retained if still significant.<br />

Relationships were commonly found between various multiple macroinvertebrate metrics and<br />

one water quality measure, floristic quality metric, or other variable. Groups were created as<br />

„least disturbed‟ or „degraded‟ condition with samples having parameter values equal to and<br />

lower or higher than the 25 th or 75 th percentile value, respectively. The macroinvertebrate<br />

metrics that were significantly related to the other environmental parameters through linear<br />

regression analyses were assessed using the two-sample t-test method described by Stoddard et<br />

al. (2008), resulting in 39 macroinvertebrate metric responses to 11 groups, with two groups<br />

eliminated in this process. Many metrics also responded to various groups in the t-test analysis,<br />

thus it was necessary to define each metric by its greatest t-score, further eliminating many a<br />

priori groups.<br />

Twenty-six metrics were retained, the greatest numbers of which were found in the Number of<br />

Herbicides Detected group, Native Plant Richness group, and Maximum Depth group, with a<br />

small representation of other groups having metrics with significant t-scores. Five<br />

macroinvertebrate metrics having the lower t-score between high and low a priori groupings<br />

were eliminated due to redundancy (Pearson R > 0.70) with another macroinvertebrate metric.<br />

Only the Native Plant Richness, Number of Herbicides Detected, and Maximum Depth groups<br />

were further evaluated because they had the greatest response from macroinvertebrate metrics<br />

when metrics also responded to other parameters and groups. These three groups represented<br />

hydrological and floristic wetland qualities as well as anthropogenic disturbance. The remaining<br />

21 metrics were two sample t-tested in these groups.<br />

T-test values remained significant for three metrics in the native plant richness group: Shannon‟s<br />

Diversity Index (+), Percent Burrowers (-), and Count Intolerant Taxa to Suspended Solids and<br />

Sediments (SSS) (+) (Table 12). Four completely different metrics in the maximum depth „high‟<br />

and „low‟ groups were found to be significant in t-test scores: Percent Hydroptilidae (+), Count<br />

ETO taxa (+), Percent Sprawler Taxa (+), and Percent Intolerant based on mean Regional<br />

Tolerance Values (+). The metrics having significant t-test scores between the low and high<br />

Number of Herbicides Detected group were Percent Non-Insect Taxa (-), Percent Burrowers (-),<br />

Intolerant Taxa to Heavy Metals (+), and Count Intolerant Taxa to Suspended Solids and<br />

Sediments (+). These metrics were not significantly (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!