21.03.2013 Views

Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure ...

Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure ...

Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fowkes 2008 (Continued)<br />

Interventions Smokefree legislation (Smoking, Health and Social Care (Scotland) Bill) implemented on 26th March 2006 prohibiting<br />

<strong>smoking</strong> in indoor workplaces including bars, restaurants and cafes.<br />

Outcomes Self reported <strong>smoking</strong> status.<br />

Smoking cessation defined as having stopped <strong>smoking</strong> <strong>for</strong> at least 3 months.<br />

Biochemical verification: No<br />

Notes Other outcomes reported were support <strong>for</strong> the <strong>smoking</strong> ban.<br />

Gallus 2007<br />

Methods Country: Italy<br />

Setting: Italian population<br />

Design: population based surveys conducted be<strong>for</strong>e and after implementation of the legislation in 2004, 2005 and<br />

2006. Analysis: per cent prevalence of current <strong>smoke</strong>rs of the adult population.<br />

Participants Representative multistage sampling of adults from 147 municipalities.<br />

Baseline sample (2004): 3535 respondents. Female: 1836 (52%)<br />

2005 sample: 3114 respondents. Female: 1603 (51.4%)<br />

2006 sample: 3039 respondents. Female: 1578 (52%)<br />

Age: 15 yrs or older<br />

Interventions Legislation implemented in Italy on January 10th 2005 which prohibits <strong>smoking</strong> in indoor public places including<br />

bars, restaurants, cafes unless they have a separate <strong>smoking</strong> area with continuous floor-to-ceiling walls and a ventilation<br />

system (Law n. 3).<br />

Outcomes Self-reported <strong>smoking</strong> status and mean number of cigarettes consumed per day.<br />

Biochemical verification: No<br />

Notes Other outcomes reported are support <strong>for</strong> economic impact.<br />

Galán 2007<br />

Methods Country: Spain<br />

Setting: Population of Madrid region<br />

Design: Observational study, cross-sectional surveys, pre and post- ban surveys. Analysis: P value: comparison of<br />

period post-law (January-July 2006) vs period pre-law (October-November 2005), Chi 2 test, t test, binary and<br />

multinomial logistic regression models.<br />

Participants Baseline n=1750. Follow up n=1252. Overall Response rate: 66%<br />

Baseline: Female 51.7%, Age 18-29 yrs 26.3%; 30-44 yrs 40.4%; 45-64 yrs 33.3%<br />

Follow up: Female 50.9%, Age 18-29 yrs 26.8%; 30-44 yrs 38.3%; 45-64 yrs 34.9%<br />

Interventions Evaluation of <strong>exposure</strong> to SHS in Spain be<strong>for</strong>e and after the implementation of legislation on January 1st 2006.<br />

The legislation prohibits <strong>smoking</strong> in indoor workplaces but this doesn’t include bars and restaurants. For bars and<br />

restaurants less than 100 sq m, the proprietor can decide whether to ban <strong>smoking</strong> or not. For premises

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!