Fisheries - Enviro Dynamics Namibia

11 RECOMMENDATIONS
11.1 MITIGATION
F I S H E R I E S , M A M M A L S A N D S E A B I R D S S P E C I A L I S T S T U D Y
The information presented in this assessment has been provided by NatMIRC. The spatial
assessment provided here is a first attempt, based on the information provided, to assess the risk
associated with the proposed dredging for phosphates. We advise that there is a need for the
establishment of a baseline for the MLA. This can be based on the available data, but where
considered critical, additional data collected for a baseline prior to mining commencing.
To mitigate loss of fishing grounds there are no realistic options in our view. The only possible
exception is the accommodation of the needs of the monk fishery through a mutually agreed
access operational plan.
For mammals and seabirds protocols for minimising deck light intensity should be introduced as
well as following JNCC standards for minimising interactions with marine mammals (similar to
those followed by seismic survey vessels).
11.2 MONITORING
Due to the small scale of the proposed dredging operations in the context of the larger ecosystem
and extent of the marine resources it is unlikely to be able to discriminate a clear signal relating
to ecosystem change as a result of dredging (primarily due to variability within the ecosystem).
In the short term both MFMR and the mining lease operator should establish appropriate
monitoring line (s) through the Mining Licence Area to monitor the effects of dredging on a realtime
basis (possibly coinciding with established surveys).
Given the number of industrial mineral EPLs that have been granted in the area between Walvis
Bay and Lüderitz consideration should be given to requesting that the Benguela Current
Commission incorporate into their Strategic Environmental Assessment of the mineral sector of
the Benguela ecosystem a study of the potential impacts of dredging.
Final Report
Namibian Marine Phosphate (Pty) Ltd.
Page 82