22.03.2013 Views

CONTENT 5.1 SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR ... - CIB-W18

CONTENT 5.1 SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR ... - CIB-W18

CONTENT 5.1 SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR ... - CIB-W18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of these frames is typically influenced by the connections used, adequate<br />

connection design is of particular interest when these frames are used in<br />

high-risk earthquake zones. Results from current research on seismic performance<br />

and force modification factors for braced timber frames are presented<br />

in this paper. Static and dynamic tests were conducted on a several<br />

connection details with different diameter bolts and high strength glulam<br />

rivets, with steel side plates. The resulting hysteresis loops were used to<br />

develop non-linear mathematical models on a connection and frame level.<br />

The models were then used in numerous non-linear time history dynamic<br />

analyses, from which it was possible to determine the influence of different<br />

connection details on seismic response of braced timber frames.<br />

From the presented results, it is evident that the seismic response of<br />

braced timber frames is heavily influenced by the behaviour of the connections.<br />

The results suggest that braced frames with different connections<br />

should not be assigned the same R-factor. Braced timber frames with mild<br />

steel (ASTM A-307) bolted connections, with slenderness ratios (l/d) of 10<br />

or higher showed far more adequate seismic performance than those<br />

frames that utilized bolts with lower slenderness ratios. Further research is<br />

needed, however, to study the effects of other parameters such as end distance,<br />

spacing, number of rows number of bolts in a row etc., for the development<br />

of general recommendations that will ensure ductile behaviour<br />

of braced frames with bolted connections. Until such research is undertaken,<br />

an R-factor of 1.5 appears to be reasonable for braced timber frames<br />

with slender bolts.<br />

On the other hand, glulam riveted connections showed promising results<br />

when used for braced timber frames. They were the only connections<br />

tested that consistently showed non-brittle deformations in the wood along<br />

with yielding of the connectors even at large displacement levels. In addition,<br />

riveted connections do not have as many parameters that influence<br />

their cyclic behaviour, other than those implemented in the CSA086.1-94<br />

design guidelines. Braced frames with glulam riveted connections designed<br />

in rivet yielding mode may be assigned an R factor of 2.0, in<br />

recognition of their higher and more consistent ductility capacity.<br />

32-15-2 N Kawai<br />

Application of capacity spectrum method to timber houses<br />

Summary<br />

Capacity spectrum method (CSM) is known as a convenient prediction<br />

method for earthquake response of buildings, and is now discussed in Japan<br />

as one of the procedures to confirm the seismic performance of buildings<br />

in a technical standard under the revised Building Standard Law of<br />

Japan. In this paper, the results of CSM are compared with the results of<br />

time history analyses (THA), using one mass system models and two mass<br />

system models with the load-displacement hysteresis model based on the<br />

results of static cyclic loading tests on shear walls. The comparison of the<br />

results for one mass systems model shows that equivalent linear response<br />

tends to give a smaller prediction than the time history analysis when the<br />

equivalent viscous damping ratio, heq, of first loop of cyclic loading protocol<br />

proposed in ISO/TC165 is used. When heq is reduced to 80% of the<br />

original in CSM, the prediction gives better agreement for one mass system<br />

models in maximum response displacement. Also for two mass system<br />

models, the results of CSM with 80% of heq agreed well with those of<br />

THA in maximum response displacement. However, there was a case that<br />

CSM gives smaller prediction of relative story displacement, which is 64%<br />

of a result of THA.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The earthquake response predictions by capacity spectrum method were<br />

compared with the results of time history analyses using one mass system<br />

models and two mass system models, load-displacement relationships of<br />

which are determined by those of shear wall(s). The results are summarized<br />

as follows:<br />

According to the results of the examination using one mass system<br />

models, capacity spectrum method gives good prediction compared with<br />

the results of time history analyses in maximum displacement, when the<br />

equivalent viscous damping ratio reduced to 80% of the original is used.<br />

Also for two mass system models, capacity spectrum method gave good<br />

agreement in maximum story displacement with reduced values of equivalent<br />

viscous damping to 80%.<br />

However, it seems to be risky to use the result of capacity spectrum<br />

method directly for the evaluation of maximum relative story displace-<br />

<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 5 SPECIAL ACTIONS page <strong>5.1</strong>7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!