22.03.2013 Views

CONTENT 5.1 SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR ... - CIB-W18

CONTENT 5.1 SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR ... - CIB-W18

CONTENT 5.1 SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR ... - CIB-W18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusions<br />

It is obvious that, in general, different notional charring rates should be<br />

used for modelling the effective section not only with respect to load capacity<br />

and stiffness but also with respect to the state of stresses. In many<br />

applications this distinction is not necessary as in the case of fire-exposure<br />

on four sides or of very large sections. While in calculations of bending<br />

load capacity a loss of strength should be taken into account, it is not necessary<br />

to regard the loss of the modulus of elasticity when the flexural<br />

stiffness of the member is determined. Therefore in design rules notional<br />

charring rates should be linked together with rules about, whether, or how<br />

much the strength and the modulus of elasticity has to be reduced. In the<br />

case of the specimens of the investigation referred to here, it was possible<br />

to use only two different charring rates in connection with different reductions<br />

of strength and modulus of elasticity, see Figure 16. In other applications<br />

this may be different.<br />

Assuming a simple effective cross section of rectangular shape it is<br />

possible to achieve good agreement between calculated and test results. It<br />

is therefore unnecessary to introduce rounded edges in the model. In most<br />

cases the increase in accuracy of the model should be illusory whilst its<br />

use would be more complicated.<br />

By using the notional charring concept it is possible to specify expressions<br />

which are specific to different applications. Thus the concept is sufficiently<br />

general and should be useful in future applications.<br />

25-16-1 J König<br />

The effect of density on charring and loss of bending strength in fire<br />

Summary<br />

The influence of density on charring of timber exposed to standard fire is<br />

studied, evaluating test results by Norén. It was found that both the effective<br />

and measured charring rates vary about 10 % in the density interval<br />

between 290 and 420 kg/m 3 , representing characteristic densities of<br />

strength classes C14 to C40 in EN 338. It was found that there was no influence<br />

of density on the loss of bending strength.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The influence of density on the charring rate is considerably smaller than<br />

given in the <strong>CIB</strong> Timber design code. Since it is small in the interval of<br />

most used structural classes, it should he disregarded in practical applications.<br />

25-16-2 F Bolonius Olesen, J König<br />

Tests on glued-laminated beams in bending exposed to natural fires<br />

Summary<br />

A series of fire tests with so-called natural fire exposure of loaded glued<br />

laminated beams was performed. The fire exposure of three sides during<br />

the tests was governed by a temperature-time relationship determined according<br />

to an energy balance method (opening factor method) with different<br />

fire load densities and opening factors. The results confirmed the rate<br />

of charring on the wide side of the member obtained by Hadvig. The average<br />

charring depth on the lower side of the member was greater than the<br />

average charring depth on the wide side when the width of the lower side<br />

was smaller than about 180 mm.<br />

Considering the mechanical behaviour, the tests showed that a loss of<br />

strength and stiffness of the residual cross section occurred, and that it<br />

<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 5 SPECIAL ACTIONS page 5.31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!