22.03.2013 Views

CONTENT 5.1 SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR ... - CIB-W18

CONTENT 5.1 SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR ... - CIB-W18

CONTENT 5.1 SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR ... - CIB-W18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

type F. Only the small gypsum fibreboard with a thickness of 10 mm<br />

showed in the tests slightly unsafe fire behaviour as the calculation. The<br />

calculated time of start of charring of gypsum plasterboards type A was also<br />

confirmed by the test results. However, the failure time of the fire tests<br />

was underestimated and therefore the charring depth of wood based panels<br />

protected by gypsum plasterboards type A was smaller than the calculation<br />

according EN 1995-1-2. Based on the fire tests the calculated failure time<br />

of gypsum plasterboards could be increased. However, this assumption has<br />

to be confirmed by large scale tests. Furthermore the calculated time of<br />

start of charring of multilayer wood panels should be decreased, because<br />

the char-layer of these linings felt off earlier than the char-layer of solid<br />

panels.<br />

39-16-1 T G Williamson, B Yeh<br />

Fire performance of FRP reinforced glulam<br />

Abstract<br />

One of the emerging advanced engineered wood technologies in the United<br />

States and other countries is the use of high strength fiber-reinforced<br />

polymers (FRP) to reinforce the tension zone of structural glued laminated<br />

timber (glulam). Glulam is used in numerous long-span commercial building<br />

applications where the glulam is exposed for architectural reasons. For<br />

some occupancy use classifications, the U.S. building code mandates that<br />

these exposed glulam members be rated for one-hour fire construction.<br />

The most structurally efficient use of FRP reinforcement is to place the<br />

FRP on the outermost face of the glulam member. However, there is no<br />

published information on how a glulam beam reinforced in this manner<br />

will perform when directly exposed to fire.<br />

In order to address this concern, representatives of APA - The Engineered<br />

Wood Association (APA), the Market Development Alliance<br />

(MDA) Engineered Wood Team, and the University of Maine Advanced<br />

Engineered Wood Composites Center (AEWCC) sponsored a fire test program<br />

of FRP reinforced glulam beams at Omega Point Laboratories in San<br />

Antonio, Texas. The purpose of the testing was to gain an understanding<br />

of the performance of FRP composites exposed to fire when used as a<br />

structural reinforcement for glulam beams.<br />

This paper describes the results of two test programs conducted in accordance<br />

with ISO Standard 834. The first test program was a pilot study<br />

involving relatively small FRP reinforced glulam beams. Based on the results<br />

of this pilot study, a second test program was then undertaken to<br />

evaluate the fire performance of FRP reinforced glulam beams designed to<br />

achieve a one-hour fire rating. The results of these tests led to the development<br />

of a design methodology to permit establishing fire ratings for<br />

FRP reinforced glulam.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Based on these tests, it was clearly demonstrated that a glulam beam with<br />

an FRP applied to the bottom face of the beam and directly exposed to a<br />

fire (no bumper lamination) can be designed to achieve a one-hour fire rating<br />

when evaluated in accordance with the ASTM E 119 or ISO 834 fire<br />

test protocol. It was also shown that for the two different FRP reinforcement<br />

layers used in this study there were no discernible differences in<br />

overall fire and structural performance. These results should open up new<br />

market opportunities for FRP reinforced glulam when a one-hour fire rating<br />

is required with the FRP applied to the outermost tension face.<br />

Results of these tests suggested that the FRP reinforced glulam could be<br />

designed for fire rating in a similar manner as the conventional nonreinforced<br />

glulam. Test data from these studies supported the proposed<br />

mechanics-based methodology by increasing the depth of the FRP reinforced<br />

beam to achieve a one-hour fire rating. As manufacturers in the<br />

U.S. seek building code acceptance of proprietary FRP reinforcement systems,<br />

this testing will provide the basis for justifying one-hour rated assemblies<br />

using FRP reinforced glulam beams.<br />

39-16-2 J König, B Källsner<br />

An easy-to-use model for the design of wooden i-joists in fire<br />

Abstract<br />

A numerical study was conducted with the objective to determine crosssectional<br />

and strength properties of I-shaped joists subjected to charring<br />

under ISO 834 standard fire exposure. The outcome of this work should be<br />

design parameters in terms of Eurocode 5 (EN 1995-1-2) for I-joists in<br />

bending where the tension flange is on the fire exposed side of the joist;<br />

these are the time of start of charring, charring depths and modification<br />

factors for strength. The I-joists are assumed to be integrated in floor assemblies<br />

consisting of joists, linings made of gypsum plasterboard or<br />

<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 5 SPECIAL ACTIONS page 5.39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!