22.03.2013 Views

CONTENT 5.1 SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR ... - CIB-W18

CONTENT 5.1 SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR ... - CIB-W18

CONTENT 5.1 SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR ... - CIB-W18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Concluding remarks<br />

This paper presents the outcomes of experimental tests conducted on small<br />

and larger laminated veneer lumber (LVL) cross-sections subjected to<br />

two-dimensional fire exposure.<br />

A 2D FE conductive model was implemented in Abaqus and validated<br />

on the experimental tests and numerical analyses carried out on timber<br />

sections subjected to one-dimensional fire exposure. Different proposals<br />

for the thermo-physical parameters were investigated. The Eurocode 5<br />

proposal was found to predict the temperature distribution of small cross<br />

sections subjected to 1D fire exposure with excellent accuracy. For small<br />

LVL cross sections subjected to 2D fire exposure, however, the approximation<br />

was lower but still acceptable, whereas the 2D heating process of<br />

the larger cross-sections was predicted with a delayed temperature rise,<br />

particularly in the interior fibres. A new proposal for the conductive model<br />

was therefore made. This proposal assumes the same variations of density<br />

and specific heat as recommended in Eurocode 5 Part 1-2, but considers a<br />

variation of the conductivity according to Frangi up to 550°C, and then<br />

slightly increased values with respect to Eurocode 5 in the range 550°C to<br />

1200°C. The new proposal leads to better predictions for the larger crosssections<br />

and slightly worse, but still acceptable, predictions for the small<br />

LVL cross-section subjected to 2D fire exposure, and for the timber section<br />

subjected to 1D fire exposure, where the heating process of the inner<br />

fibres is slightly anticipated. It must be pointed out, however, that the<br />

small cross-section has less technical relevance than the other crosssections<br />

as it is a narrow member with very low inherent fire resistance,<br />

probably needing additional passive protection if a given fire rating has to<br />

be achieved.<br />

In order to generalize the new proposals, further experimentalnumerical<br />

comparisons should be carried out on large members made from<br />

glulam or different wood-based materials. The numerical model will then<br />

be used for coupled thermal-stress analyses aimed at investigating the fire<br />

resistance of timber beams, timber-concrete composite structures, and<br />

connections.<br />

43-16-1 J Schmid, J König<br />

Light timber frame construction with solid timber members – Application<br />

of the reduced cross-section method<br />

Abstract<br />

In timber members exposed to fire a zone of about 35 to 40 mm depth below<br />

to the char layer, although unburned, is heated above ambient temperature.<br />

Due to the elevated temperature this zone, strength properties and<br />

the modulus of elasticity of the residual cross-section must be reduced.<br />

Two methods, known as reduced properties method and reduced crosssection<br />

method, respectively, are used in practice. In the first one the<br />

strength and stiffness properties of the cross-section, e.g. bending strength<br />

or modulus of elasticity, are multiplied by modification factors for fire,<br />

while in the second one, the residual cross-section is reduced by a socalled<br />

zero-strength layer, whereas the strength and stiffness properties<br />

remain unreduced.<br />

For the calculation of the mechanical resistance of wall and floor assemblies<br />

in fire consisting of light timber frame members with rectangular<br />

cross-sections of solid timber and cavities filled with insulation, EN 1995-<br />

1-2 gives a design model using the reduced properties method. In order to<br />

simplify the calculation the original data were re-evaluated and expressions<br />

for zero-strength layers were derived to allow the use of the reduced<br />

cross-section method. For bending, the zero-strength layers were calculated<br />

to achieve the best fit of bending resistance in the range of load ratios<br />

between 0,2 and 0,4. Only for load ratios smaller than 0,2 the results are<br />

slightly non-conservative. For axially loaded members, the zero-strength<br />

layers were determined to give the same or lower bending stiffness than<br />

according to the reduced properties method. The axial resistance of studs,<br />

however, calculated using the method of EN 1995-1-1 with properties relevant<br />

for the fire situation, is somewhat greater when the reduced crosssection<br />

method is used.<br />

Conclusions<br />

It has been shown that the reduced properties method for the calculation of<br />

the mechan of timber frame members (studs or joists) in wall and floor assemblies<br />

can be replaced 1• cross-section method using zero-strength layers<br />

instead of modification factors for simplify design work. For members<br />

in bending, the bending resistance according to the 1 section agrees well<br />

with results from the reduced properties method since the zero-streng de-<br />

<strong>CIB</strong>-<strong>W18</strong> Timber Structures – A review of meeting 1-43 5 SPECIAL ACTIONS page 5.47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!