22.03.2013 Views

Parasites of Fish from the Great Lakes - Great Lakes Fishery ...

Parasites of Fish from the Great Lakes - Great Lakes Fishery ...

Parasites of Fish from the Great Lakes - Great Lakes Fishery ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

affect its distribution. If <strong>the</strong> appropriate intermediate and/or fish hosts are absent, <strong>the</strong> parasite will<br />

be too.<br />

The parasite community <strong>of</strong> a fish species is composed <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>: 1) parasites specific to that species,<br />

or more commonly, a higher phylogenetic grouping <strong>of</strong> fish; 2) parasites whose specificity is<br />

determined by an intermediate stage in <strong>the</strong>ir life cycle; and 3) parasites that exhibit little host<br />

specificity. <strong>Fish</strong> are not only infected by parasites specific to <strong>the</strong>m, but also by species<br />

secondarily acquired <strong>from</strong> prey. These latter parasite species will vary according to <strong>the</strong><br />

environment inhabited by <strong>the</strong> specific fish species and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r fish species present.<br />

Based on <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> parasite species in fish in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong>, many parasite species<br />

show strict host specificity to a single host species (e.g., many protozoan species and most<br />

monogenean species), some species show host specificity to a fish family (e.g., Thelohanellus<br />

notatus, Phyllodistomum staffordi, Lissorchis attenuatus, Glaridacris catostomi, Octospinifer<br />

macilentus), while o<strong>the</strong>r parasite species show no host specificity infecting several fish species in<br />

different fish families (e.g., Crepidostomum cooperi, Camallanus oxycephalus, Acanthocephalus<br />

dirus, Echinorhynchus salmonis). O<strong>the</strong>r examples <strong>of</strong> parasite species in each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se specificity<br />

groupings can be found in <strong>the</strong> tables for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong>.<br />

Jaccard Coefficients <strong>of</strong> Similarity for Parasite Communities Among <strong>the</strong><br />

Five <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong><br />

Jaccard coefficients <strong>of</strong> similarity for <strong>the</strong> parasite communities among <strong>the</strong> five major fish families<br />

(Centrarchidae, Cyprinidae, Catostomidae, Percidae, and Salmonidae) in each <strong>Great</strong> Lake were<br />

low, indicating that fish in <strong>the</strong>se families do not share many parasite species, and as well, parasite<br />

communities in each family were not similar among <strong>the</strong> five <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong> (Tables 30-34). The<br />

centrarchids in Lake Michigan do not share many parasite species with centrarchids in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong>, with <strong>the</strong> lowest coefficient involving Michigan and Superior (0.0689) (Table 30).<br />

The highest value involved centrarchids <strong>from</strong> Huron and Erie (0.4347), followed by Huron and<br />

Ontario (0.4090). Cyprinids in Lake Michigan share <strong>the</strong> smallest number <strong>of</strong> parasite species with<br />

cyprinids <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r lakes (Table 31). The lowest value (0.0588) involved cyprinids <strong>from</strong><br />

Michigan and Erie. Parasite coefficients ranged <strong>from</strong> 0.1466 to 0.2941 involving cyprinids <strong>from</strong><br />

Superior, Huron, Erie, and Ontario. For catostomids, <strong>the</strong> highest coefficients were between<br />

Superior and Ontario (0.4250) and between Erie and Ontario (0.4210) (Table 32). Overall, <strong>the</strong><br />

parasite communities <strong>of</strong> percids in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong> were <strong>the</strong> most similar, with <strong>the</strong> highest<br />

coefficients between <strong>Lakes</strong> Huron and Ontario (0.5000) and between <strong>Lakes</strong> Huron and Erie<br />

(0.4938) and <strong>the</strong> lowest coefficient between Michigan and Erie (0.2714) (Table 33). The<br />

salmonids in Lake Superior shared <strong>the</strong> largest number <strong>of</strong> parasite species with salmonids in Lake<br />

Huron (0.4761), followed by salmonids in Superior and Ontario (0.3000) (Table 34). Parasite<br />

faunas <strong>of</strong> salmonids in Erie and Michigan are most dissimilar with a value <strong>of</strong> 0.1250. <strong>Lakes</strong><br />

Michigan and Erie are very different in <strong>the</strong>ir physical habitat; however, <strong>the</strong> habitat used by<br />

salmonids in <strong>the</strong>se lakes may not be so different.<br />

527

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!