22.03.2013 Views

Parasites of Fish from the Great Lakes - Great Lakes Fishery ...

Parasites of Fish from the Great Lakes - Great Lakes Fishery ...

Parasites of Fish from the Great Lakes - Great Lakes Fishery ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

centrarchids, percids, and cyprinids and <strong>the</strong>ir autogenic helminths, followed by <strong>the</strong> catostomids<br />

and salmonids and <strong>the</strong>ir autogenic parasites.<br />

In general, fish species in <strong>the</strong> five major families examined for parasites were different among <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong>. Percids were most commonly examined in Lake Michigan, salmonids in Lake<br />

Superior, cyprinids in Lake Huron, and centrarchids and percids in <strong>Lakes</strong> Erie and Ontario. The<br />

common thread among <strong>the</strong>se lakes is that percid parasites were <strong>the</strong> most-dominant group or <strong>the</strong><br />

second most-dominant group in each lake probably because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> large number <strong>of</strong> studies and/or<br />

extensive survey(s) performed on <strong>the</strong> parasites <strong>of</strong> Perca flavescens. Perca flavescens had <strong>the</strong><br />

highest parasite species-richness in each <strong>Great</strong> Lake, except for Coregonus artedi in Lake<br />

Superior. Because <strong>the</strong>re was variation in <strong>the</strong> fish species examined among <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong>, <strong>the</strong><br />

reported parasite communities in fish <strong>from</strong> each lake were different, and <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> Jaccard<br />

coefficients are low for <strong>the</strong> parasite-community comparisons.<br />

It is probable that, as <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> fish species examined and number <strong>of</strong> parasite studies<br />

performed increases, so will <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> parasite species found in each <strong>Great</strong> Lake, especially<br />

those parasite species that are host-specific to a fish species or fish family. Although not<br />

significant, correlations were high between <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> parasite species reported <strong>from</strong> each<br />

lake and number <strong>of</strong> fish species examined and number <strong>of</strong> parasite studies performed.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se parasitological results summarized in this synopsis for each <strong>Great</strong><br />

Lake may be artifacts <strong>of</strong> sample size, may be influenced by <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> individuals <strong>of</strong> various<br />

fish species examined, may be affected by <strong>the</strong> number or lack <strong>of</strong> studies performed on specific<br />

fish species, and may be biased by <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> studies on o<strong>the</strong>r fish species.<br />

Conceptual Framework to Study <strong>Fish</strong> Health in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong><br />

Riley et al. (2008) proposed a conceptual framework for conducting ecologically oriented fish<br />

health research in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong>. Their premise was that a dysfunctional ecosystem, one that<br />

has been disrupted to reduce vigor, organization, or resilience, may show a wider range <strong>of</strong><br />

variability to factors that influence disease transmission, <strong>the</strong>reby increasing <strong>the</strong> likelihood that <strong>the</strong><br />

threshold required for epizootics will be exceeded. The material <strong>the</strong>y presented focused on<br />

viruses and bacteria <strong>of</strong> fish, and <strong>the</strong>y discussed three models involving thiamine deficiency<br />

complex, botulism, and bacterial kidney disease in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong>.<br />

A possible example <strong>of</strong> parasites and a dysfunctional ecosystem involves <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

cestodes, especially <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> genera Bothriocephalus and Proteocephalus, in Sander vitreus in<br />

Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. These cestodes use copepod zooplankton as <strong>the</strong> first intermediate host<br />

and small fish as <strong>the</strong> second intermediate host or as <strong>the</strong> paratenic host. Sander vitreus and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

fish species become infected by eating <strong>the</strong> infected copepods or small fish. In 2007, <strong>the</strong>re were<br />

numerous angler reports <strong>of</strong> an increased prevalence <strong>of</strong> cestodes in Sander vitreus <strong>from</strong> Saginaw<br />

Bay and its tributaries (J. Baker, Michigan Department <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources and <strong>the</strong><br />

Environment, personal communication, 2007 and 2008). It was suggested that biological<br />

conditions in Saginaw Bay (specifically, changes in <strong>the</strong> food chain) in 2007 may have changed to<br />

make <strong>the</strong> cestode infection in Sander vitreus more prevalent than in previous years. The increased<br />

535

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!