22.03.2013 Views

Parasites of Fish from the Great Lakes - Great Lakes Fishery ...

Parasites of Fish from the Great Lakes - Great Lakes Fishery ...

Parasites of Fish from the Great Lakes - Great Lakes Fishery ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in composition and numbers between locations and appear to be stochastic in nature. This<br />

variability in helminth (parasite) species-richness and low Jaccard coefficients for parasitecommunity<br />

similarity for <strong>the</strong>se same fish species provides more evidence that <strong>the</strong> parasite faunas<br />

are different among <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong>.<br />

Comparisons <strong>of</strong> Jaccard coefficients were made for each fish species between lakes and its family<br />

between lakes to determine if differences existed in <strong>the</strong>m in <strong>the</strong> lake pairs examined. The highest<br />

Jaccard coefficients for <strong>the</strong> parasite communities for each specific fish species and for <strong>the</strong> fish<br />

families each fish species is in among <strong>the</strong> lakes (first and second coefficients), and lowest<br />

coefficients for each specific fish species and for <strong>the</strong> fish families each species is in (third and<br />

fourth coefficients) (in paren<strong>the</strong>ses) were: Ambloplites rupestris (0.4285, <strong>Lakes</strong> Huron and<br />

Ontario; 0.4347, <strong>Lakes</strong> Huron and Erie; and 0.0000, <strong>Lakes</strong> Michigan and Superior; 0.0689, <strong>Lakes</strong><br />

Michigan and Superior); Notropis hudsonius (0.4138, <strong>Lakes</strong> Superior and Erie; 0.2941, <strong>Lakes</strong><br />

Superior and Huron; and 0.1200, <strong>Lakes</strong> Michigan and Superior; 0.0588, <strong>Lakes</strong> Michigan and<br />

Erie); Catostomus commersonii (0.6176, <strong>Lakes</strong> Erie and Ontario; 0.4250, <strong>Lakes</strong> Superior and<br />

Ontario; and 0.1795, <strong>Lakes</strong> Michigan and Erie; 0.1311, <strong>Lakes</strong> Michigan and Erie); Perca<br />

flavescens (0.4821, <strong>Lakes</strong> Huron and Ontario; 0.5000, <strong>Lakes</strong> Huron and Ontario; and 0.1795,<br />

<strong>Lakes</strong> Michigan and Superior; 0.2714, <strong>Lakes</strong> Michigan and Erie); Coregonus clupeaformis<br />

(0.5000, <strong>Lakes</strong> Superior and Ontario; 0.4776, <strong>Lakes</strong> Superior and Huron; and 0.1379, <strong>Lakes</strong><br />

Huron and Erie; 0.1250, <strong>Lakes</strong> Michigan and Erie); Salvelinus namaycush (0.2173, <strong>Lakes</strong><br />

Superior and Huron; 0.4761, <strong>Lakes</strong> Superior and Huron; and 0.0000, <strong>Lakes</strong> Erie and Ontario;<br />

0.1250, <strong>Lakes</strong> Michigan and Erie); Osmerus mordax (0.3750, <strong>Lakes</strong> Michigan and Ontario;<br />

0.3750, <strong>Lakes</strong> Michigan and Ontario; and 0.1764, <strong>Lakes</strong> Superior and Erie; 0.1764, <strong>Lakes</strong><br />

Superior and Erie). These coefficients indicate that: 1) <strong>the</strong> highest coefficients for a fish species<br />

and its family may not involve <strong>the</strong> same two lakes, demonstrating different coefficients may be<br />

obtained when one fish species or fish family is being compared; 2) <strong>the</strong>re is variation between<br />

lakes in that a fish species may share very few species, or it may share a number <strong>of</strong> parasite<br />

species between lakes; and 3) variation in <strong>the</strong>se coefficients indicates that some parasite species<br />

are host-specific or not host-specific to a certain fish species or fish family.<br />

Each fish species occupies similar habitats in <strong>the</strong> different <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong>, and are <strong>the</strong>refore believed<br />

to be exposed to similar parasites and <strong>the</strong>ir intermediate and paratenic hosts. Also, fish in <strong>the</strong><br />

Cyprinidae, Catostomidae, Centrarchidae, Percidae, and Salmonidae in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Great</strong> <strong>Lakes</strong> are<br />

similar to one ano<strong>the</strong>r when <strong>the</strong> percentages <strong>of</strong> major parasite taxonomic groups are compared<br />

among lakes, but <strong>the</strong> specific parasite species making up each major parasite taxonomic group<br />

infecting fish are not that similar among <strong>the</strong> lakes. This finding indicates <strong>the</strong> factors involved in<br />

<strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> parasite species in <strong>the</strong> same fish species are different <strong>from</strong> <strong>Great</strong> Lake to <strong>Great</strong><br />

Lake. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> Jaccard coefficients <strong>of</strong> parasite-community similarity are low among <strong>the</strong><br />

lakes. Many protozoan and most monogenean species with <strong>the</strong>ir fish-host specificity are not<br />

shared by fish species or fish families, so <strong>the</strong>se parasite groups play a major role in <strong>the</strong>se low<br />

Jaccard coefficients.<br />

532

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!