24.03.2013 Views

Advanced Welding Processes: Technologies and Process Control

Advanced Welding Processes: Technologies and Process Control

Advanced Welding Processes: Technologies and Process Control

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

98<br />

<strong>Advanced</strong> welding processes<br />

Chemical analysis may be a useful indicator of potential problems, but it<br />

may be costly <strong>and</strong> unreliable in view of the low levels of surface-active<br />

elements which need to be identified <strong>and</strong> the uncertainty of the correlation<br />

between the analysis <strong>and</strong> the penetration profile.<br />

Direct weldability trials involve making a joint of the required type using<br />

an established welding procedure, sectioning the bead <strong>and</strong> measuring its<br />

cross sectional area. This approach has been common but it is time consuming<br />

<strong>and</strong> requires expert analysis.<br />

A variety of indirect weldability tests have been investigated [106–108]<br />

<strong>and</strong> it has been found that it is feasible to identify the cast-to-cast effect by<br />

measuring the time for a weld to penetrate a known thickness of plate under<br />

controlled conditions. Alternatively, the material characteristics may be<br />

identified from direct observation of the weld pool using video techniques or<br />

by monitoring light <strong>and</strong> voltage signals from the arc.<br />

6.4.2 <strong>Control</strong> of pulsed TIG<br />

In pulsed GTAW, the process is controlled by the variables described above<br />

for conventional GTAW plus the pulse parameters. The influence of the<br />

pulse parameters has been described above.<br />

6.4.3 <strong>Control</strong> of plasma welding<br />

The control of plasma welding is slightly more complex than GTAW. The<br />

main control variables are the same as GTAW, but plasma gas flow rate <strong>and</strong><br />

the diameter <strong>and</strong> geometry of the plasma orifice will also have a significant<br />

effect on the operation of the process. A smaller plasma orifice will produce<br />

an increased arc force, whereas a large nozzle diameter will result in a ‘soft’<br />

plasma which is more like a GTAW arc. If the plasma gas flow is too low, the<br />

current too high, or the nozzle cooling is restricted, an arc may form directly<br />

across the gap between the electrode <strong>and</strong> the nozzle; this ‘double arcing’<br />

phenomenon will result in serious damage to the orifice.<br />

As with GTAW, higher currents allow higher travel speeds to be used, but,<br />

as the current is increased, there is a more noticeable increase in arc force<br />

which may result in undercut. If both the plasma gas flow <strong>and</strong> current are<br />

increased, the keyhole mode of operation is possible as described in Chapter 8.<br />

The main factors controlling GTAW <strong>and</strong> related processes are summarized<br />

in Table 6.4.<br />

6.5 Summary<br />

The capabilities of GTAW have been extended by basic modifications to the<br />

operating technique such as pulsing, multicathode <strong>and</strong> hot-wire addition, the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!