Advanced Welding Processes: Technologies and Process Control
Advanced Welding Processes: Technologies and Process Control
Advanced Welding Processes: Technologies and Process Control
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
98<br />
<strong>Advanced</strong> welding processes<br />
Chemical analysis may be a useful indicator of potential problems, but it<br />
may be costly <strong>and</strong> unreliable in view of the low levels of surface-active<br />
elements which need to be identified <strong>and</strong> the uncertainty of the correlation<br />
between the analysis <strong>and</strong> the penetration profile.<br />
Direct weldability trials involve making a joint of the required type using<br />
an established welding procedure, sectioning the bead <strong>and</strong> measuring its<br />
cross sectional area. This approach has been common but it is time consuming<br />
<strong>and</strong> requires expert analysis.<br />
A variety of indirect weldability tests have been investigated [106–108]<br />
<strong>and</strong> it has been found that it is feasible to identify the cast-to-cast effect by<br />
measuring the time for a weld to penetrate a known thickness of plate under<br />
controlled conditions. Alternatively, the material characteristics may be<br />
identified from direct observation of the weld pool using video techniques or<br />
by monitoring light <strong>and</strong> voltage signals from the arc.<br />
6.4.2 <strong>Control</strong> of pulsed TIG<br />
In pulsed GTAW, the process is controlled by the variables described above<br />
for conventional GTAW plus the pulse parameters. The influence of the<br />
pulse parameters has been described above.<br />
6.4.3 <strong>Control</strong> of plasma welding<br />
The control of plasma welding is slightly more complex than GTAW. The<br />
main control variables are the same as GTAW, but plasma gas flow rate <strong>and</strong><br />
the diameter <strong>and</strong> geometry of the plasma orifice will also have a significant<br />
effect on the operation of the process. A smaller plasma orifice will produce<br />
an increased arc force, whereas a large nozzle diameter will result in a ‘soft’<br />
plasma which is more like a GTAW arc. If the plasma gas flow is too low, the<br />
current too high, or the nozzle cooling is restricted, an arc may form directly<br />
across the gap between the electrode <strong>and</strong> the nozzle; this ‘double arcing’<br />
phenomenon will result in serious damage to the orifice.<br />
As with GTAW, higher currents allow higher travel speeds to be used, but,<br />
as the current is increased, there is a more noticeable increase in arc force<br />
which may result in undercut. If both the plasma gas flow <strong>and</strong> current are<br />
increased, the keyhole mode of operation is possible as described in Chapter 8.<br />
The main factors controlling GTAW <strong>and</strong> related processes are summarized<br />
in Table 6.4.<br />
6.5 Summary<br />
The capabilities of GTAW have been extended by basic modifications to the<br />
operating technique such as pulsing, multicathode <strong>and</strong> hot-wire addition, the