26.03.2013 Views

Bharatiya Pragna - Dr. Th Chowdary

Bharatiya Pragna - Dr. Th Chowdary

Bharatiya Pragna - Dr. Th Chowdary

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Book-Review<br />

Indus or Sindhu-Sarasvati<br />

Civilization, but also in taking the beginnings of<br />

the history of Indian Civilization as we know it<br />

(as distinct from its prehistory, which is what the<br />

Harappan civilization amounts to in current historical<br />

discourse) back by several thousands of<br />

years:<br />

To order:<br />

Add postage Rs. 25.00<br />

Payment should be<br />

made through D.D.s or<br />

cheques payable at Delhi in<br />

favor of Aditya Prakashan,<br />

New Delhi .<br />

Or you could deposit<br />

at any Bank of India branch<br />

for “Aditya Prakashan”,<br />

BOI, Ansari Road Branch,<br />

New Delhi,<br />

a/c C603220100012624<br />

Aditya Prakashan<br />

2/18 Ansari Road ,<br />

New Delhi-110002<br />

www.adityaprakashan.com<br />

While the beginnings of the history of<br />

the Egyptian and the Mesopotamian Civilizations<br />

are known to lie at least as far back as the fourth<br />

millennium BCE on the basis of detailed decipherable<br />

and deciphered records (inscriptions,<br />

scrolls, etc.), the beginnings of Indian Civilization<br />

as we know it could not really be traced far<br />

earlier than the mid-second millennium BCE, and<br />

even this only on the basis of back-tracking the<br />

75<br />

stages of Vedic history (whether logically or illogically<br />

done) from the oldest known decipherable<br />

and deciphered records found in India: the<br />

Ashokan inscriptions of the latter half of the first<br />

millennium BCE. <strong>Th</strong>e earlier records, of the<br />

Harappan Civilization, are not yet convincingly<br />

deciphered ; and the interpretation of the signs<br />

on the Harappan seals (from the question of the<br />

identity of the language represented in those seals<br />

down to the question of whether or not, indeed,<br />

any language is represented at all in them) has<br />

been a matter of motivated debate: the academic<br />

scholars presume the language of the Harappan<br />

Civilization to be non-Indo-European, since the<br />

current academically accepted theory requires<br />

that the Indo-European “Indo-Aryans” could not<br />

have “entered” India far earlier than the latter<br />

half of the second millennium BCE.<br />

However, ironically, decipherable and<br />

deciphered records are found in West Asia (Iraq,<br />

Syria, and even Palestine and Egypt), dating to<br />

the mid-second millennium BCE, which record<br />

the presence of “Indo-Aryan” speakers in West<br />

Asia at around the same time as they are supposed<br />

to have been entering into India. <strong>Th</strong>e presence<br />

of these “Indo-Aryans”, the Mittani “Indo-<br />

Aryans”, in West Asia has hitherto been interpreted<br />

as evidence of an “Indo-Aryan” group<br />

which broke away from the main body of “Indo-<br />

Aryans” somewhere in Central Asia, and moved<br />

westwards to appear in West Asia at around the<br />

same time as the main body of “Indo-Aryans”<br />

appeared in northwestern India.<br />

But the analysis of the Rigvedic, Avestan<br />

and Mittani data in this book completely over-<br />

November & December 2008 <strong>Bharatiya</strong> <strong>Pragna</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!