27.03.2013 Views

LAW OF DURESS IN ISLAMIC LAW AND COMMON LAW: A ...

LAW OF DURESS IN ISLAMIC LAW AND COMMON LAW: A ...

LAW OF DURESS IN ISLAMIC LAW AND COMMON LAW: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Islamic Studies, 30:3 (1991) 349<br />

For example, conarning tbe Wbility of involuntary coofedom, the Supreme Court<br />

baa~aniadividualizcdrpproeehbsredonthetotrlityd~.(3ulombev.<br />

Canoectieut, 367 US., 3%. 602 (1961); Fikes v. Alabama, 352 U.S. 191,197 (1957), Paync<br />

v. Artuua. 356. U.S. 560. 567 (1958); Haley v. Ohio. 332. U.S. 596. 599 (1948). Sec,<br />

Mdloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1.7. (1964); Haynts v. W-, 373 U.S. 503 (1963) Minay<br />

v. Arinnu, 437 U.S. 385 (1978). In Cukms6e. while atstiq that dmtahcu h the utiinatc<br />

test of the ntidity of umfcdsions, the Supreme Court recognLsd that this h not &ly a<br />

quation of pychololly but nrlee of law applied to psychological facts. In Stein v. New York.<br />

346 U.S 156.182-186 (1952) m'd on other grounds. Jsctson v. Denno. 378 U.S. 368 (1964).<br />

the Cwrt uaerted that sina physical violence serves no lawful pqm& it is inhenntly<br />

d. Intamgation docs serve a axial value and, tbmfore, it i not inbcrently coercive.<br />

Sec.Pletcber. "Individualiution",pp. 1m-1mand Fiagamte. VicZindElllion, pp. SlW.<br />

ThcImpedofdmoresisevidentinthe~ofanradmarri.ges.Se~notiom<br />

concerning women's honour played a larger rde than they at present do. Sac. Memdith v.<br />

Meredith. 79 Mo. App. 636 (1899). (Threatending to kill the man who dishonoured a<br />

daugbtm is not dureaa); Shepberd v. Shepherd. 192 S.W. 658. 661-63 (1917). (threats that<br />

raulthaman~the~he~tedandpomiaedto~inotdurrrv<br />

bealeethmisastrongprerrumptiOnthattbemarrisgewasentmdhtoinMmntof<br />

moral obligations); Sec also, L.N. Bmwn. 'The Shotgun marriage," 42 Tul. L. Rev. 837<br />

(1968). D. Bradky. "Duress and Arranged Marriages," 46. Modem L. Rev. 499 (1983);<br />

Wertheimer, C h , pp. 71-n.<br />

A eue miming from outside the field of dues dmomtrata, that even juries can believe<br />

that there i h a p a choice. In Maddl v. Rraoe. 511 S.W. 2d 225 (Ts. 1974). Marshall<br />

was held priooner in his how by his neighbow's vidous boar. The boar had charged Marahdl<br />

ten or twelve timcs. MarsbaU had pmioudy disarssed the Hog's viaoumea with defendant.<br />

Eventually, the boar managed to in@ Marshall as be attempted to kave hio home. The<br />

jury found that MarsbaU was conbibutody negligent for fading to build a face around hio<br />

~,andbe*~therisLofinjurywhen,despiteofhiob~ofthe<br />

v i h propearities of boar. Madd faikd to aboot the boar. Thc Court of Appcd affhncd.<br />

Thc Supreme Court of Texan held that contributory ne-a is not a dsfoaa in stria<br />

lirbility cases. Importantly, the Court held that Marshall did not anumc the risk because<br />

he did not have a free and voluntary choice. The plaintiff's choice3 of riaking injury arc<br />

remaining a Ppironer at home mere not as a mattcr of law the vduntary choices to which<br />

the law mtiW him. Additionally. the daughter ofthe aoimal was not areaonable al-tive<br />

sina be d d have faad pnxca,tion for ouch an act. Idcm, at 2#%1. Evidently, tbe<br />

Covrtwasforcedbythe jurie8uns~emlyvadicttoa~prrtcnrionrofaviYmenx,me.<br />

'h Cow? had to rely on legal standards, and on the I@ jargon of "as a mattcr of law"<br />

which in reality betray idea of appmpriate social bebaviow. and balancing of rights and<br />

entiUemmts. ilia arc is d*arsred h Wcrtheimer, Cocrdan p. 61.<br />

Kaph v. K.plan. la. N.E. 2d. M6.710 (1962). (the threat of personal embamsmmt<br />

wuwt~asnttorendcrpl.intitibmnofqdtyofd~ti.lformaLingacon~);<br />

ace. Wertheimer. Corrdon, p. 12.<br />

Inordertopmvedterytheaccuoerha~topmvidefourwi~whobdtheseNd<br />

ret including penetration without apying. Sec, on Qcrdhf (the crime of ururing mucone of<br />

sdultery or fornication). Ibn Rushd. Biddym d-MyW, (Cairo Mumtapha Halabi. 1981),<br />

VOI. n, pp. 44043.<br />

'he MPC, docs not ~~4)gniSe threats to reputation in criminal carcs. Sac note W above<br />

and acannpanying W.<br />

WV. Lewis, 4 S.E. 2d. 464,468 (Cia. 1939). lbis case is d i d in Wertheimcr, Coercion,<br />

P. 38.<br />

Ibe Court in m, hoveva, atated that, 'lbc thnat. . . must be suf6cicnt to ovmanc<br />

the mind and will of a penon of onbary hem." Id.. p. 467. 'hk might uplrin the<br />

court's duision. Oae ferL the Court WM motivated by mutated policy (or otherwbe)<br />

conaidemtiom cspeeidly in Light of the fad that the purportbdly ~d that a -tiff

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!