29.03.2013 Views

zoroastrianism ancient and modern - Hindu Temple of Greater ...

zoroastrianism ancient and modern - Hindu Temple of Greater ...

zoroastrianism ancient and modern - Hindu Temple of Greater ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

84 VIBRATIONARY EFFICACY OF YATHA, ASHEM, YENGHE-HATAM.<br />

When this whole passage is quoted in full <strong>and</strong> explained, it is easily<br />

seen that there is no idea <strong>of</strong> the propagation <strong>of</strong> the holy prayers among the<br />

aliens in order to advocate conversion. The three fundamental formulalike-prayers-viz-Yatha<br />

Ahu Vairyo or Ahunavar, Ashem Vohu <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Yenghe Hatam <strong>of</strong> the prophet-from which the entire Avesta Scriptures<br />

have been formulated as 21 Nasks-are in this passage remembered for<br />

their great vibrationary effects in removing <strong>and</strong> annihilating all the major<br />

evil forces in nature. The <strong>of</strong>ficiating priest in the great Yazashne<br />

ceremony repeats these words <strong>of</strong> great vibratory-effect which from their<br />

very essence are meant for the removal <strong>of</strong> all the evil forces <strong>of</strong> the evil<br />

Spirit or Anghra Mainyu specified in the passage. Hence instead <strong>of</strong><br />

quoting the whole passage the writer <strong>of</strong> Zoroastrian Theology simply with<br />

the deliberate intention <strong>of</strong> misleading downright the reader <strong>of</strong> his book<br />

quotes only the first sentence partially omitting all the “in order to”<br />

enumerated in the same paragraph. The adoption <strong>of</strong> this method is highly<br />

objectionable <strong>and</strong> schematic, for the writer <strong>of</strong> the book has purely an<br />

intention <strong>of</strong> taking an undue advantage <strong>of</strong> the ignorance <strong>of</strong> the Parsi public<br />

re original Avesta scriptures. No man <strong>of</strong> ordinary common-sense after<br />

reading the above passage through can ever be inclined to say therefrom<br />

that Zoroaster preached proselytism in Yacna LXI; 1. The book <strong>of</strong> Zoroastrian<br />

Theology deserves very strong strictures on account <strong>of</strong> this<br />

improper <strong>and</strong> queer style employed by the writer.<br />

We shall now dismiss the discussion <strong>of</strong> this very obnoxious<br />

paragraph headed "The religious propag<strong>and</strong>a" on p. 74. We have seen<br />

that all the Avesta passages quoted therein for proving 'proselytism are<br />

half-quoted, mis-quoted, misrepresented, <strong>and</strong> far-fetched, <strong>and</strong> that<br />

therefore the conclusion drawn by the writer about<br />

"The Zoroastrian missionaries succeeding in planting the banner <strong>of</strong><br />

Zoroastrian faith."<br />

is quite illogical, groundless, <strong>and</strong> based on utterly wrong premises.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!