29.03.2013 Views

zoroastrianism ancient and modern - Hindu Temple of Greater ...

zoroastrianism ancient and modern - Hindu Temple of Greater ...

zoroastrianism ancient and modern - Hindu Temple of Greater ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

122 ‘ASHEMAOGA’ i.e. A HERETIC re RULES OF CEREMONIAL.<br />

"the drinking <strong>of</strong> the consecrated Haoma moreover brings destruction to the demons."<br />

as quoted from Yacna X § 6.<br />

We have thus seen that the writer's attempt to do away with the<br />

Haoma ceremony from the Zoroastrian teachings is made without any<br />

logical argument <strong>and</strong> is quite fruitless. It is no doubt a strange device to<br />

cut at the foundation <strong>of</strong> a thing in order that the thing may not seem to<br />

exist. Such device has been noticed by us in the first chapter in the<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> the division <strong>of</strong> Avesta scriptures into periods,-in the second<br />

chapter in the treatment <strong>of</strong> the advocacy <strong>of</strong> proselytism,-<strong>and</strong> even in this<br />

third chapter in the treatment <strong>of</strong> Zoroastrian rituals. He seems to regard<br />

the Haoma ceremony as one not upheld by Zoroaster in order to enable<br />

himself to say that all rituals which have as their basis the Haoma<br />

ceremony have not been taught by the prophet himself. Moreover the<br />

writer himself calls one who teaches wrongly about the rules <strong>of</strong><br />

ceremonials by the name <strong>of</strong> Ashemaoga, i.e. an -apostate, for he says on<br />

p. 166 that-<br />

“Ashemaoga seems to be a theological <strong>and</strong> ritual designation <strong>of</strong> one who<br />

deviates from the prescribed teachings <strong>of</strong> the established church <strong>and</strong> who preaches<br />

heresy both as regards the doctrines <strong>of</strong> the faith <strong>and</strong> the rules <strong>of</strong> ceremonial."<br />

Having thus determined to establish a Zoroastrian religion void<br />

<strong>of</strong> any ceremonial, the writer has his message to that effect in the<br />

various parts <strong>of</strong> his book. While taking side <strong>of</strong> the so-called reformers<br />

he speaks irresponsibly against Zoroastrian rituals on pp. 346 to 348 <strong>of</strong><br />

his book. He says on p. 346.<br />

“The reformers urged that a vast structure <strong>of</strong> formalism <strong>and</strong> ritual had<br />

replaced the edifice <strong>of</strong> the simple faith, <strong>and</strong> religion had simply turned into<br />

ritualism…………Religion they urged does not consist in laying up merit by<br />

ceremonials.”<br />

On p. 348 he continues that-<br />

“No amount <strong>of</strong> ceremonials performed by the living could either mitigate<br />

the sufferings or improve his condition in the spiritual world.... The rituals do not<br />

affect its position.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!