29.03.2013 Views

zoroastrianism ancient and modern - Hindu Temple of Greater ...

zoroastrianism ancient and modern - Hindu Temple of Greater ...

zoroastrianism ancient and modern - Hindu Temple of Greater ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14 SPLIT BETWED GATHAS AND LATER AVESTA.<br />

writer <strong>of</strong> Zoroastrian Theology on the other is this that whereas the<br />

former put dearly before the public both the fact <strong>of</strong> there being 21<br />

Nasks <strong>of</strong> Zoroaster <strong>and</strong> their own speculation, the latter simply tries to<br />

mislead the public by empirically dividing all the Scriptures into<br />

Periods, <strong>and</strong> stamping dogmatically all the Scriptures as post-<br />

Zoroastrian except the Gathas. It is this empirical attitude adopted by<br />

the writer that invites animadversions on such a book.<br />

Instead <strong>of</strong> first proving with evidence the division <strong>of</strong> Scriptures<br />

into Gathic or Zoroastrian, <strong>and</strong> Later Avestan or Post Zoroastrian <strong>and</strong><br />

then basing his arguments on the proved facts, the writer <strong>of</strong> the book<br />

from the very beginning commits the logical fallacy <strong>of</strong> begging the<br />

question, <strong>and</strong> advances his favourite views <strong>of</strong> advocating the so-called<br />

reform, taking a suitable line <strong>of</strong> argument as data or hypotheses. This<br />

division according to the writer <strong>of</strong> Zoroastrian Theology is based on<br />

the distinction between poetry <strong>and</strong> prose, because it is generally<br />

believed that poetry precedes prose in the progress <strong>of</strong> human speech.<br />

But even this argument cannot hold good, for we have seen in the<br />

words <strong>of</strong> Darmesteter that the most important Nask the Stot Yasht<br />

which included the Gathas also contained 33 chapters, <strong>of</strong> which 22<br />

were metrical <strong>and</strong> 11 prosaic. If therefore poetry <strong>and</strong> prose occur<br />

simultaneously in one <strong>and</strong> the same Nask containing the Gathas, how<br />

can it be logically said that the Gathas were previous in age to the<br />

prosaic part <strong>of</strong> all the Avesta Scriptures. In fact this demarcation-made<br />

by the philological school without underst<strong>and</strong>ing the extent <strong>and</strong> spirit<br />

<strong>of</strong> the entire original Zoroastrian Scriptures, -the split between the<br />

Gathas <strong>and</strong> the later Avesta,-is adyanced only as an argument quite<br />

adapted to their various ulterior objects <strong>of</strong> promulgating views <strong>and</strong><br />

doctrines <strong>of</strong> their own devising, <strong>and</strong> suitable to their own <strong>modern</strong><br />

social <strong>and</strong> economic environments.<br />

Hence it is that the learned Dastur Darab P. Sanjana emphatically<br />

says regarding the entire original Scriptures <strong>of</strong> Zoroaster in the<br />

following words on page xxx Introduction to the Pahlavi Vendidad: -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!