A Companion to Linear B - The University of Texas at Austin

More documents

Recommendations

Info

52 T.G. PALAIMA §12.1.1.4 signs and given them a conventional numbering. But the work of Kober and Bennett was undertaken with the knowledge that even small mistakes could be serious impediments to decipherment. Bennett and Kober proposed to provide a modern conventional equivalent for the ‘Minoan’ ABC’s. Evans’ system was arbitrary. Kober and Bennett debated whether the order of standard signs should be based on sign frequency within the corpus of inscriptions (Kober’s preference, because it would be helpful in the decipherment process), or on groupings of signs according to their shapes (Bennett’s preference because it is likely the way that at least some of the signs were generated in the first place). Eventually, the order based on shapes, simple and straight linear to more complex and curvilinear, was adopted (Fig. 12.11). This order is still used today. (2) Identifying the handwriting styles of individual tablet-writers as a preliminary (and necessary) step for the identification of the signs. As a means to this end, Bennett undertook a wholesale study of all available Pylos and Knossos material. All the Linear B tablets are anonymous, 31 thus this kind of work required exacting attention to the way in which the signs of the script were written, both the ca 90 signs for phonetic values (phonograms) and the greater number of signs for things or the words that identified things (ideograms or logograms). 32 Kober and Bennett both understood that it was a sine qua non to get this correct. Otherwise ‘noise’ (i.e., false elements) would be introduced into the fundamental data. Scientific use of these data depended on the correct identification of different scribal versions of the standard signs of the syllabary. The identification of the basic signs of the syllabary was further complicated by the appearance, on transport pottery (called stirrup jars), of painted signs in (RUIPÉREZ – MELENA 1990, 110, who compare the iroha of Japanese kana writing) they are a mnemonic for the first signs of the syllabary, memorized by users of the Linear B script in learning how to write. See here DUHOUX 2008. We may compare the modern acrophonic mnemonics used to represent the standard sequence of letters of the alphabet. For purposes of telephonic communication NATO, the International Civil Aviation Organization and the Federal Aviation Administration use the following: Alfa, Bravo, Charlie, Delta, Echo = a, b, c, d, e. Likewise, see the mnemonic sequence used for the early Cyrillic alphabet: Az, Buki, Vedi, Glagol, Dobro, Est = /a, b, v, g, d, e/. 31 BENNETT 1960b. 32 The bookkeeping structure of the Linear B records clearly separates the ideograms/logograms from the syntax of the phonetically represented words (see DUHOUX 1985, 16-17; PALAIMA 2004b). Thus it was not difficult for Evans, Kober and Bennett to identify the chief ideograms (cf. BENNETT 1947, 21).
§12.1.1.4 SCRIBES, SCRIBAL HANDS AND PALAEOGRAPHY 53 Fig. 12.12. Bennett’s comparisons of phonetic signs from Knossos, Pylos and Mycenae (after PT II, 201)
Page 1 and 2: BIBLIOTHÈQUE DES CAHIERS DE L'INST
Page 3 and 4: SUMMARY CHAPTER 12 SCRIBES, SCRIBAL
Page 5 and 6: §12.1.1 SCRIBES, SCRIBAL HANDS AND
Page 9 and 10: §12.1.1.1 SCRIBES, SCRIBAL HANDS A
Page 21: §12.1.1.4 SCRIBES, SCRIBAL HANDS A
Page 27 and 28: §12.1.2.1.1 SCRIBES, SCRIBAL HANDS
Page 65 and 66: §12.2 SCRIBES, SCRIBAL HANDS AND P
Page 73 and 74:
§12.2.2.1 SCRIBES, SCRIBAL HANDS A
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
§12.2.4 SCRIBES, SCRIBAL HANDS AND
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
§12.3 SCRIBES, SCRIBAL HANDS AND P
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
show all

A Companion to Linear B - The University of Texas at Austin

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?