03.04.2013 Views

A Companion to Linear B - The University of Texas at Austin

A Companion to Linear B - The University of Texas at Austin

A Companion to Linear B - The University of Texas at Austin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

§12.1.1 SCRIBES, SCRIBAL HANDS AND PALAEOGRAPHY 35<br />

the <strong>at</strong>tention paid <strong>to</strong> palaeography (viz. the study <strong>of</strong> handwriting styles) and <strong>to</strong><br />

the distinctive fe<strong>at</strong>ures <strong>of</strong> writing on clay documents th<strong>at</strong> can be <strong>at</strong>tributed <strong>to</strong><br />

individual scribes or tablet-writers. <strong>The</strong> Mycenaean texts are difficult for us <strong>to</strong><br />

read and understand, but, as we shall see, their correct interpret<strong>at</strong>ion has been<br />

facilit<strong>at</strong>ed (or even made possible) by the discovery th<strong>at</strong> we can <strong>at</strong>tribute them <strong>to</strong><br />

specific scribes and consequently group them in ways which otherwise would not<br />

have been justifiable or even imaginable. At the same time these detailed studies<br />

have a direct impact on our understanding <strong>of</strong> the workings <strong>of</strong> Mycenaean administr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

and <strong>of</strong> the n<strong>at</strong>ure and extent <strong>of</strong> Mycenaean literacy. Why Mycenaean<br />

scholars have adopted this line <strong>of</strong> approach will become clear if we first look <strong>at</strong><br />

some <strong>of</strong> their early work both before and after the decipherment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Linear</strong> B.<br />

§12.1.1. Palaeographical studies before the decipherment<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are several reasons why palaeography has come <strong>to</strong> play such a key<br />

role in <strong>Linear</strong> B studies.<br />

First, when inscriptions first began <strong>to</strong> be noticed, purchased and finally discovered<br />

in excav<strong>at</strong>ion by Sir Arthur Evans 3 — and then by other excava<strong>to</strong>rs —, 4<br />

it was soon observed th<strong>at</strong> they fell in<strong>to</strong> three main c<strong>at</strong>egories <strong>of</strong> writing. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

Evans called Cretan Pic<strong>to</strong>graphic or Hieroglyphic, <strong>Linear</strong> A and <strong>Linear</strong> B. 5<br />

Right from the beginning, it was noticed th<strong>at</strong> these three scripts used a good<br />

many signs or characters in common.<br />

However, it was not easy <strong>to</strong> figure out with certainty wh<strong>at</strong> the similarities<br />

and differences among these writing systems meant. <strong>The</strong> inscriptions came<br />

from different sites and periods. 6 <strong>The</strong>y were written on different m<strong>at</strong>erials; we<br />

find writing on clay tablets, labels, sealings and roundels; s<strong>to</strong>ne dedica<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

vessels and s<strong>to</strong>ne seals; gold and silver artifacts; walls; and ceramic vases,<br />

mainly large s<strong>to</strong>rage vessels called pithoi and the vessels used for transporting<br />

oil known as stirrup jars. 7 And they were inscribed using different techniques:<br />

(1) carving or incising in<strong>to</strong> hard m<strong>at</strong>erial; (2) literally drawing signs in<strong>to</strong> wet<br />

and thus s<strong>of</strong>t clay; (3) painting with a brush. <strong>The</strong> shapes <strong>of</strong> the signs were<br />

affected by these different ways <strong>of</strong> writing and the different media used.<br />

3<br />

MCDONALD – THOMAS 1990, 113-169.<br />

4 Beginning in 1894 and continuing through Evans’ excav<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>at</strong> the major Cretan site <strong>of</strong><br />

Knossos.<br />

5<br />

BENNETT 1996; CHADWICK 1987; DUHOUX 1985, 8-23; MCDONALD – THOMAS 1990, 160-161;<br />

OLIVIER 1989, 237-252 and figs. 20-24; SM I.<br />

6 See PALAIMA 1990b for an overview.<br />

7<br />

BENNETT 1986; CHIC; GORILA; HALLAGER 1996; RAISON 1968; SACCONI 1974.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!