Are Men Born Sinners? - Library of Theology
Are Men Born Sinners? - Library of Theology
Are Men Born Sinners? - Library of Theology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Matt. 13:38-39; John 3:8; Rev. 12:9; II Tim. 2:26; Eph. 4:27; Eph. 6:11; James 4:7; I<br />
Peter 5:8-9.<br />
If the doctrine <strong>of</strong> original sin is true, the devil is in complete ignorance <strong>of</strong> it. Or if he is<br />
not ignorant <strong>of</strong> it, he is dumb enough to go to the trouble <strong>of</strong> tempting men for nothing.<br />
Would the devil tempt men if he knew that they had a sinful nature which would make<br />
them sin without being tempted? How foolish and ignorant the devil must be. If the<br />
doctrine <strong>of</strong> original sin is true, then Jesus and the inspired writers lived in complete<br />
ignorance <strong>of</strong> it, as well. Jesus exhorted his followers to watch and pray that they not enter<br />
into temptation, and he taught them to pray, "Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us<br />
from evil." Matt. 26:41, Matt. 6:12. His Apostles, in their writings, exhorted the believers<br />
to be on their guard against the snares <strong>of</strong> the devil, lest they be tempted and fall into sin. I<br />
Peter 5:8-9, Eph. 6:11-12. These would have been useless exhortations if all Christians<br />
have a sinful nature which makes them sin without being tempted. In fact, if the doctrine<br />
<strong>of</strong> original sin is true, Jesus and the inspired writers lived under a complete cloud <strong>of</strong><br />
ignorance. Instead <strong>of</strong> ascribing the sins <strong>of</strong> mankind to a physical connection with Adam,<br />
they ascribed them to a moral connection with the tempter--the devil. They spoke <strong>of</strong><br />
sinners as being children <strong>of</strong> the devil and as being <strong>of</strong> their father the devil (I John 3:8-10,<br />
John 8:44, Acts 13:10). They spoke <strong>of</strong> the sins <strong>of</strong> mankind as being the work <strong>of</strong> the devil<br />
and <strong>of</strong> sinners becoming sinners by the agency <strong>of</strong> the devil. Matt. 13:38-39. They spoke<br />
<strong>of</strong> Christ as coming to destroy the works <strong>of</strong> the devil. I John 3:8. Finally, they spoke <strong>of</strong><br />
the sinner as being a captive <strong>of</strong> the devil, who needed to recover himself out <strong>of</strong> the devil's<br />
snare. II Tim. 2:26. It is hard to understand how they could have been so far <strong>of</strong>f the track<br />
if the doctrine <strong>of</strong> original sin were true.<br />
The Bible teaches nothing about an inherited sinful nature from Adam. It teaches only<br />
that all men are tempted and that they sin when they yield to their own desires rather than<br />
obey the law <strong>of</strong> God and reason.<br />
Return to the Index<br />
Appendix F<br />
The Folly <strong>of</strong> Taking Text out <strong>of</strong> Context<br />
In answering the objection in chapter five that "Paul taught that the flesh is sinful and that<br />
sin dwells in the flesh," I made the statement that "Every kind <strong>of</strong> foolish and superstitious<br />
belief can be proved from the Bible if it is not interpreted according to the demands <strong>of</strong><br />
context, language, common sense, and reality." As an illustration <strong>of</strong> this, I referred the<br />
reader to the passage in Romans 7:14-25, which is used to teach that the Apostle Paul<br />
was himself in bondage to sin at the time he wrote his epistle to the Romans.