04.04.2013 Views

Are Men Born Sinners? - Library of Theology

Are Men Born Sinners? - Library of Theology

Are Men Born Sinners? - Library of Theology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

appealing to the false logic that "a belief held by the majority for a long time is pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

its truth."<br />

12. OBJECTION: The Jews believed in the doctrine <strong>of</strong> original sin at the time <strong>of</strong> Jesus.<br />

They said to the man born blind: "Thou wast altogether born in sins, and dost thou teach<br />

us?" John 9:34. This verse shows that the doctrine <strong>of</strong> original sin is true.<br />

ANSWER: This verse does not teach that there was a belief in the doctrine <strong>of</strong> original sin<br />

at the time <strong>of</strong> Jesus, nor does it teach that the religious leaders believed in original sin. If<br />

anything, it teaches the exact opposite, because if the religious leaders had believed in<br />

original sin, they would have been forced to say something like this: "Well, you have as<br />

much right to teach us as we do to teach you, since we are all, altogether born in sins."<br />

But they were not, in any way, including themselves in this thing <strong>of</strong> being "altogether<br />

born in sins." They were excluding themselves and limiting it only to the man born blind.<br />

What they really were saying was this: "You're a vile, despicable sinner, and you<br />

presume to teach us? We are holy and righteous before God and will you who was<br />

altogether born in sins presume to teach us?" They were not teaching the doctrine <strong>of</strong><br />

original sin anymore than David taught it when he said <strong>of</strong> himself, "Behold, I was shapen<br />

in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me." In fact, they meant to say the same<br />

thing about the man born blind that David meant to say about himself. David meant to<br />

say that he was a vile and despicable sinner and guilty before God, and they meant to say<br />

the same thing about the man born blind. But they, in no way, meant to include<br />

themselves with the man born blind and teach that they also were "altogether born in<br />

sins."<br />

The above text no more teaches the doctrine <strong>of</strong> original sin than the question the disciples<br />

asked Christ teaches it. "Master, who did sin, this man or his parents, that he was born<br />

blind?" Christ answered their question with the words, "Neither hath this man sinned, nor<br />

his parents." John 9:3.<br />

We must be careful not to make doctrines out <strong>of</strong> either the statements <strong>of</strong> false religious<br />

leaders or the speculative questions <strong>of</strong> Christ's disciples.<br />

In darkness it lurks behind a mask <strong>of</strong> decency and respectibility fashioned <strong>of</strong> biblical<br />

pro<strong>of</strong>-texts.<br />

It cringes and pulls away when the brilliant light <strong>of</strong> Bible truth falls upon it.<br />

It retreats to the shadows when the dazzling light <strong>of</strong> reason and common sense<br />

approaches.<br />

It flees and hides from the glaring gaze <strong>of</strong> close scrutiny.<br />

And there in the darkness it skulks, fearful that its mask be torn away, and it, at last,<br />

without its covering, wither and die under the burning light <strong>of</strong> truth.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!