Are Men Born Sinners? - Library of Theology
Are Men Born Sinners? - Library of Theology
Are Men Born Sinners? - Library of Theology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Part Two: Answering the Christian's Objections<br />
Chapter Five: Objections Answered<br />
Several objections have been made to the Bible doctrine <strong>of</strong> sin, which is the doctrine that<br />
men are created upright, and that they sin and corrupt themselves. Eccl. 7:29. The<br />
following is an attempt to answer these objections:<br />
1. OBJECTION: We know from observation that babies are born with a sinful nature,<br />
because they fuss and scream, refuse to eat, go into a rage, throw tantrums, etc.<br />
ANSWER: It is both morally and physically impossible to be born with a sinful nature.<br />
First, it is a moral impossibility because a baby cannot justly be a sinner by birth that a<br />
baby can be a sinner and guilty and condemned at birth is morally unthinkable! Second, it<br />
is a physical impossibility because sin is not a substance and so cannot be transmitted<br />
physically.<br />
But we know that babies fuss and scream, refuse to eat, and throw tantrums before they<br />
know the difference between right and wrong. Do those who advocate the doctrine <strong>of</strong><br />
original sin want to advance the argument that an inherited sin nature makes little babies<br />
sin before they even know what it is and before they know that they are sinning? This<br />
makes sin such a completely necessary, involuntary, and impersonal thing that there<br />
could never be any blame or guilt for it. If it is true that little babies sin because <strong>of</strong> a<br />
sinful nature and before they even know they are sinning, then it follows that they are<br />
completely automated and that their sin is completely necessary, involuntary, and<br />
impersonal. If all this were true, you could no more blame sinners for being sinners than<br />
you could blame a clock for striking the hour something it does impersonally,<br />
involuntarily, and necessarily because it was built to do so.<br />
But babies fuss and scream, refuse to eat, throw tantrums, etc., not because <strong>of</strong> a sinful<br />
nature, but in response to pain and discomfort, the likes and dislikes <strong>of</strong> appetite, and the<br />
urges and desires <strong>of</strong> the sensibility. True, they do things which we think are selfish and<br />
sinful, and things which would in fact be selfish and sinful if they did them knowing<br />
them to be wrong. But while they have no knowledge <strong>of</strong> right and wrong, their actions<br />
have no moral character, and therefore their actions are not and cannot be "sinful." It is<br />
only when a child's reason has developed and he has a clear understanding <strong>of</strong> right and<br />
wrong (an understanding <strong>of</strong> his accountability and the moral nature <strong>of</strong> his actions) that he<br />
becomes a moral agent and is responsible and accountable for his actions.<br />
2. OBJECTION: We know from observation that sin is inherited because we see children<br />
inherit the sinful traits <strong>of</strong> their parents.<br />
ANSWER: Children do inherit physical traits from their parents but they do not and<br />
cannot inherit moral traits or sin from their parents. Children only appear to inherit the