04.04.2013 Views

Are Men Born Sinners? - Library of Theology

Are Men Born Sinners? - Library of Theology

Are Men Born Sinners? - Library of Theology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Part Two: Answering the Christian's Objections<br />

Chapter Five: Objections Answered<br />

Several objections have been made to the Bible doctrine <strong>of</strong> sin, which is the doctrine that<br />

men are created upright, and that they sin and corrupt themselves. Eccl. 7:29. The<br />

following is an attempt to answer these objections:<br />

1. OBJECTION: We know from observation that babies are born with a sinful nature,<br />

because they fuss and scream, refuse to eat, go into a rage, throw tantrums, etc.<br />

ANSWER: It is both morally and physically impossible to be born with a sinful nature.<br />

First, it is a moral impossibility because a baby cannot justly be a sinner by birth that a<br />

baby can be a sinner and guilty and condemned at birth is morally unthinkable! Second, it<br />

is a physical impossibility because sin is not a substance and so cannot be transmitted<br />

physically.<br />

But we know that babies fuss and scream, refuse to eat, and throw tantrums before they<br />

know the difference between right and wrong. Do those who advocate the doctrine <strong>of</strong><br />

original sin want to advance the argument that an inherited sin nature makes little babies<br />

sin before they even know what it is and before they know that they are sinning? This<br />

makes sin such a completely necessary, involuntary, and impersonal thing that there<br />

could never be any blame or guilt for it. If it is true that little babies sin because <strong>of</strong> a<br />

sinful nature and before they even know they are sinning, then it follows that they are<br />

completely automated and that their sin is completely necessary, involuntary, and<br />

impersonal. If all this were true, you could no more blame sinners for being sinners than<br />

you could blame a clock for striking the hour something it does impersonally,<br />

involuntarily, and necessarily because it was built to do so.<br />

But babies fuss and scream, refuse to eat, throw tantrums, etc., not because <strong>of</strong> a sinful<br />

nature, but in response to pain and discomfort, the likes and dislikes <strong>of</strong> appetite, and the<br />

urges and desires <strong>of</strong> the sensibility. True, they do things which we think are selfish and<br />

sinful, and things which would in fact be selfish and sinful if they did them knowing<br />

them to be wrong. But while they have no knowledge <strong>of</strong> right and wrong, their actions<br />

have no moral character, and therefore their actions are not and cannot be "sinful." It is<br />

only when a child's reason has developed and he has a clear understanding <strong>of</strong> right and<br />

wrong (an understanding <strong>of</strong> his accountability and the moral nature <strong>of</strong> his actions) that he<br />

becomes a moral agent and is responsible and accountable for his actions.<br />

2. OBJECTION: We know from observation that sin is inherited because we see children<br />

inherit the sinful traits <strong>of</strong> their parents.<br />

ANSWER: Children do inherit physical traits from their parents but they do not and<br />

cannot inherit moral traits or sin from their parents. Children only appear to inherit the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!