FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY - Bio Medical Forensics
FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY - Bio Medical Forensics
FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY - Bio Medical Forensics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that the collection of<br />
structural information from microscopic examination of hair may allow<br />
for the observed differences in hair morphology to be applied to<br />
differences in the permeability of hair to drugs. The information from<br />
this study may be useful to improve laboratory procedures employed by<br />
hair drug testing laboratories.<br />
Hair Morphology, Drug and Dye Incorporation, Microscopy<br />
K38 Analysis of Cocaine Analytes in Human<br />
Hair II: Evaluation of Different Hair Color<br />
and Ethnicity Types Following Surface<br />
Contamination and Laboratory<br />
Decontamination<br />
Jeri D. Ropero-Miller, PhD*, and Cynthia Lewallen, MS, RTI<br />
International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Building 3, 3040 Cornwallis Road,<br />
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; Nichole D. Bynum, MS, Center for<br />
Forensic Sciences, RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Building 3,<br />
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; Meredith Meaders, BS, RTI<br />
International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Building 3, Research Triangle Park,<br />
NC 27709; Jordan N. Espenshade, MSFS, 1420 Centre Avenue, Apartment<br />
103, Pittsburgh, PA 15282; and John M. Mitchell, PhD, Michael R. Baylor,<br />
PhD, and Peter R. Stout, PhD, Center for Forensic Sciences, RTI<br />
International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709<br />
After attending this presentation, attendees will understand: (1) the<br />
in vitro model of drug surface contamination used to investigate cocaine<br />
analyte concentrations and ratios in hair; (2) the permeability of hairs and<br />
potential variations in drug absorbance in different hair color and types;<br />
and (3) how processes and procedures used by hair drug testing<br />
laboratories may affect drug analyte concentrations in hair.<br />
This presentation will impact the forensic science community by<br />
directly affecting policy implementation for forensic applications of hair<br />
testing, such as the investigation of drug facilitated crimes and<br />
workplace drug testing.<br />
Introduction: The mechanism(s) of permeability of hair to drugs<br />
are not fully understood. Research data suggest that hair color may<br />
affect cocaine’s incorporation into and retention in the hair matrix. The<br />
possibility that because of hair color one individual may be more likely<br />
to test positive for a drug than another, despite both having ingested or<br />
having been exposed to the same amount of a drug, greatly concerns<br />
policymakers and forensic practitioners. The potential for such bias<br />
must be understood to ensure the correct interpretation of results and the<br />
appropriate use of hair testing. If it is shown that hair color influences<br />
drug permeability, current drug testing methods may need to be<br />
improved in order to take these variations into account and remove any<br />
potential for bias and false-positive results. The goal of this study was<br />
to evaluate cocaine analytes in hair of different color (e.g., light, dark)<br />
and ethnic origin (e.g., Caucasian, African American) after the hair has<br />
been subjected to surface contamination with cocaine and subsequent<br />
laboratory decontamination.<br />
Methods: The in vitro surface contamination study design was<br />
modified to a shorter collection time, but generally followed a previously<br />
published method by Stout et al. 2006. Briefly, verified drug-free head<br />
hair samples (Caucasian light and dark hair types, African American;<br />
n=12 each) were collected under IRB protocol, contaminated with<br />
cocaine HCl powder, shampooed daily for 8 weeks with aliquots<br />
removed weekly for decontamination (two washing protocols: methanol<br />
and extensive phosphate buffer) and cocaine analyte testing by<br />
LC/MS/MS. Quantitative analytical procedures for the determination of<br />
COC, BE, CE, and NCOC in hair were performed on an Agilent<br />
Technologies 1200 Series liquid chromatography system coupled to a<br />
6410 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, operated in positive ESI<br />
mode. For confirmation, two transitions were monitored and one ion<br />
ratio was determined which was acceptable if within 20% of the ratio of<br />
known calibration standards. The limits of quantitation (LOQ) for COC<br />
was 25 pg/mg and BE, CE, and NCOC were 2.5 pg/mg. The upper limit<br />
of linearity was 55,000 pg/mg for cocaine and 1,000 pg/mg for all other<br />
analytes. Between run imprecision for COC at 150 pg/mg was less than<br />
3% and at 15 pg/mg for all other analytes was less than 8%.<br />
Results: While previous cocaine surface contamination studies<br />
were designed to provide an estimate of interindividual variation, this<br />
study included sufficient samples to determine differences between<br />
ethnic groups or hair color with statistical significance. The preliminary<br />
data suggests there was no apparent simple relationship between<br />
concentration and hair color by this in vitro cocaine surface<br />
contamination model.<br />
Conclusion: The results of this study along with continued studies<br />
may influence how hair testing results are interpreted, and could have a<br />
significant impact on whether national agencies use hair testing.<br />
Hair, Cocaine Analytes, LC/MS/MS<br />
K39 Investigation of the Effect of Vinegar on<br />
Oral Fluid Drug Testing: Effects on<br />
Immunoassay Screening<br />
Eva M. Reichardt, MSc*, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Fern<br />
Barrow, Poole, BH12 5BB, UNITED KINGDOM; Dene Baldwin, PhD,<br />
Concateno, 92 Milton Park, Oxfordshire, Abingdon, OX14 4RY, UNITED<br />
KINGDOM; and Michael D. Osselton, Bournemouth University, Fern<br />
Barrow, Talbot Campus, Poole, BH12 5BB, UNITED KINGDOM<br />
After attending this presentation, attendees will learn about: (1) the<br />
effects of different types of vinegars on the Orasure Intercept®, and<br />
microplate screen; and (2) the new Concateno Certus oral fluid<br />
collection devices with homogenous immunoassay screen.<br />
This presentation will impact the forensic science community<br />
deomonstrating how the Orasure Intercept® oral fluid collection device<br />
exhibited many oral fluid false positive after the consumption of various<br />
types of vinegar.<br />
Introduction: Oral fluid (OF) drug testing has become<br />
increasingly popular during recent years as an alternative matrix for<br />
drugs of abuse (DOA) testing. OF is simple and easy to collect and<br />
offers a non-invasive means of sample collection that can be applied for<br />
use in the work place, hospitals, drug treatment centers, and roadside.<br />
Although numerous studies have been published in relation to OF drug<br />
detection and identification, little work has been undertaken to<br />
investigate the effects of substances. In a separate study, several<br />
different foods and beverages and the result from this indicative study<br />
inferred the possibility that vinegar could cause an effect on an<br />
immunoassay screen were evaluated. This study was conducted to look<br />
at this effect in greater detail. This study investigates the effects of<br />
different types of vinegars on the Orasure Intercept® and microplate<br />
screen and the new Concateno Certus OF collection devices with<br />
homogenous immunoassay screen.<br />
Method: Non-drug using human volunteers were asked to swirl<br />
5mL of selected vinegars around the mouth. These included malt, white<br />
distilled, balsamic, red wine, and white wine vinegar. After<br />
consumption, OF was collected using the Orasure Intercept® or the new<br />
Concateno Certus OF collection devices a) immediately after mouth<br />
emptying and b) 10, 20 and 30 minutes after mouth emptying. Each<br />
volunteer provided samples using both devices for all vinegars tested.<br />
The volume, pH and time for collection of samples were recorded. OF<br />
samples were subsequently analyzed using two different immunoassays<br />
for Amphetamine, Methamphetamine, Cocaine, Methadone and Opiates.<br />
Intercept® samples were analyzed using Orasure microplates and<br />
Certus samples were analyzed using the Concateno homogeneous<br />
assays to observe whether the substances affected the immunoassay<br />
screening systems.<br />
21 * Presenting Author