04.04.2013 Views

FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY - Bio Medical Forensics

FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY - Bio Medical Forensics

FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY - Bio Medical Forensics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that the collection of<br />

structural information from microscopic examination of hair may allow<br />

for the observed differences in hair morphology to be applied to<br />

differences in the permeability of hair to drugs. The information from<br />

this study may be useful to improve laboratory procedures employed by<br />

hair drug testing laboratories.<br />

Hair Morphology, Drug and Dye Incorporation, Microscopy<br />

K38 Analysis of Cocaine Analytes in Human<br />

Hair II: Evaluation of Different Hair Color<br />

and Ethnicity Types Following Surface<br />

Contamination and Laboratory<br />

Decontamination<br />

Jeri D. Ropero-Miller, PhD*, and Cynthia Lewallen, MS, RTI<br />

International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Building 3, 3040 Cornwallis Road,<br />

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; Nichole D. Bynum, MS, Center for<br />

Forensic Sciences, RTI International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Building 3,<br />

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; Meredith Meaders, BS, RTI<br />

International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Building 3, Research Triangle Park,<br />

NC 27709; Jordan N. Espenshade, MSFS, 1420 Centre Avenue, Apartment<br />

103, Pittsburgh, PA 15282; and John M. Mitchell, PhD, Michael R. Baylor,<br />

PhD, and Peter R. Stout, PhD, Center for Forensic Sciences, RTI<br />

International, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709<br />

After attending this presentation, attendees will understand: (1) the<br />

in vitro model of drug surface contamination used to investigate cocaine<br />

analyte concentrations and ratios in hair; (2) the permeability of hairs and<br />

potential variations in drug absorbance in different hair color and types;<br />

and (3) how processes and procedures used by hair drug testing<br />

laboratories may affect drug analyte concentrations in hair.<br />

This presentation will impact the forensic science community by<br />

directly affecting policy implementation for forensic applications of hair<br />

testing, such as the investigation of drug facilitated crimes and<br />

workplace drug testing.<br />

Introduction: The mechanism(s) of permeability of hair to drugs<br />

are not fully understood. Research data suggest that hair color may<br />

affect cocaine’s incorporation into and retention in the hair matrix. The<br />

possibility that because of hair color one individual may be more likely<br />

to test positive for a drug than another, despite both having ingested or<br />

having been exposed to the same amount of a drug, greatly concerns<br />

policymakers and forensic practitioners. The potential for such bias<br />

must be understood to ensure the correct interpretation of results and the<br />

appropriate use of hair testing. If it is shown that hair color influences<br />

drug permeability, current drug testing methods may need to be<br />

improved in order to take these variations into account and remove any<br />

potential for bias and false-positive results. The goal of this study was<br />

to evaluate cocaine analytes in hair of different color (e.g., light, dark)<br />

and ethnic origin (e.g., Caucasian, African American) after the hair has<br />

been subjected to surface contamination with cocaine and subsequent<br />

laboratory decontamination.<br />

Methods: The in vitro surface contamination study design was<br />

modified to a shorter collection time, but generally followed a previously<br />

published method by Stout et al. 2006. Briefly, verified drug-free head<br />

hair samples (Caucasian light and dark hair types, African American;<br />

n=12 each) were collected under IRB protocol, contaminated with<br />

cocaine HCl powder, shampooed daily for 8 weeks with aliquots<br />

removed weekly for decontamination (two washing protocols: methanol<br />

and extensive phosphate buffer) and cocaine analyte testing by<br />

LC/MS/MS. Quantitative analytical procedures for the determination of<br />

COC, BE, CE, and NCOC in hair were performed on an Agilent<br />

Technologies 1200 Series liquid chromatography system coupled to a<br />

6410 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, operated in positive ESI<br />

mode. For confirmation, two transitions were monitored and one ion<br />

ratio was determined which was acceptable if within 20% of the ratio of<br />

known calibration standards. The limits of quantitation (LOQ) for COC<br />

was 25 pg/mg and BE, CE, and NCOC were 2.5 pg/mg. The upper limit<br />

of linearity was 55,000 pg/mg for cocaine and 1,000 pg/mg for all other<br />

analytes. Between run imprecision for COC at 150 pg/mg was less than<br />

3% and at 15 pg/mg for all other analytes was less than 8%.<br />

Results: While previous cocaine surface contamination studies<br />

were designed to provide an estimate of interindividual variation, this<br />

study included sufficient samples to determine differences between<br />

ethnic groups or hair color with statistical significance. The preliminary<br />

data suggests there was no apparent simple relationship between<br />

concentration and hair color by this in vitro cocaine surface<br />

contamination model.<br />

Conclusion: The results of this study along with continued studies<br />

may influence how hair testing results are interpreted, and could have a<br />

significant impact on whether national agencies use hair testing.<br />

Hair, Cocaine Analytes, LC/MS/MS<br />

K39 Investigation of the Effect of Vinegar on<br />

Oral Fluid Drug Testing: Effects on<br />

Immunoassay Screening<br />

Eva M. Reichardt, MSc*, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Fern<br />

Barrow, Poole, BH12 5BB, UNITED KINGDOM; Dene Baldwin, PhD,<br />

Concateno, 92 Milton Park, Oxfordshire, Abingdon, OX14 4RY, UNITED<br />

KINGDOM; and Michael D. Osselton, Bournemouth University, Fern<br />

Barrow, Talbot Campus, Poole, BH12 5BB, UNITED KINGDOM<br />

After attending this presentation, attendees will learn about: (1) the<br />

effects of different types of vinegars on the Orasure Intercept®, and<br />

microplate screen; and (2) the new Concateno Certus oral fluid<br />

collection devices with homogenous immunoassay screen.<br />

This presentation will impact the forensic science community<br />

deomonstrating how the Orasure Intercept® oral fluid collection device<br />

exhibited many oral fluid false positive after the consumption of various<br />

types of vinegar.<br />

Introduction: Oral fluid (OF) drug testing has become<br />

increasingly popular during recent years as an alternative matrix for<br />

drugs of abuse (DOA) testing. OF is simple and easy to collect and<br />

offers a non-invasive means of sample collection that can be applied for<br />

use in the work place, hospitals, drug treatment centers, and roadside.<br />

Although numerous studies have been published in relation to OF drug<br />

detection and identification, little work has been undertaken to<br />

investigate the effects of substances. In a separate study, several<br />

different foods and beverages and the result from this indicative study<br />

inferred the possibility that vinegar could cause an effect on an<br />

immunoassay screen were evaluated. This study was conducted to look<br />

at this effect in greater detail. This study investigates the effects of<br />

different types of vinegars on the Orasure Intercept® and microplate<br />

screen and the new Concateno Certus OF collection devices with<br />

homogenous immunoassay screen.<br />

Method: Non-drug using human volunteers were asked to swirl<br />

5mL of selected vinegars around the mouth. These included malt, white<br />

distilled, balsamic, red wine, and white wine vinegar. After<br />

consumption, OF was collected using the Orasure Intercept® or the new<br />

Concateno Certus OF collection devices a) immediately after mouth<br />

emptying and b) 10, 20 and 30 minutes after mouth emptying. Each<br />

volunteer provided samples using both devices for all vinegars tested.<br />

The volume, pH and time for collection of samples were recorded. OF<br />

samples were subsequently analyzed using two different immunoassays<br />

for Amphetamine, Methamphetamine, Cocaine, Methadone and Opiates.<br />

Intercept® samples were analyzed using Orasure microplates and<br />

Certus samples were analyzed using the Concateno homogeneous<br />

assays to observe whether the substances affected the immunoassay<br />

screening systems.<br />

21 * Presenting Author

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!