FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY - Bio Medical Forensics
FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY - Bio Medical Forensics
FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY - Bio Medical Forensics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Results: The Intercept® device collected an average of 0.55 mL in<br />
the 3 minutes recommended by the manufacturer. The Certus device<br />
has a built-in indicator and we collected an average of 1.15 mL in an<br />
average time of 1.67 minutes. The OF pH was not affected for either<br />
collection device. Presumptive positive Intercept®/Orasure samples<br />
were observed for amphetamine, methamphetamine and cocaine<br />
following consumption of all types of vinegar. Most presumptive<br />
positives were seen at the early time points although a significant number<br />
we also observed out to 30 minutes. The screen positives were submitted<br />
for GC/MS confirmation and found to be confirmation negative – screen<br />
false positives. There was also a depression of the binding for<br />
Intercept®/Orasure samples for opiate and methadone assays although<br />
this was not enough to trigger a positive response against the kit cut off.<br />
By comparison the Certus /Concateno samples were negative for all<br />
vinegar types and time points.<br />
Conclusion: The Orasure Intercept® OF collection device<br />
exhibited many OF false positive after the consumption of various types<br />
of vinegar. There was no significant difference between collection times,<br />
pH, or volume collected. False positive samples out to 30 minutes were<br />
a surprising observation. The Concateno Certus OF collection device<br />
was shown to collect larger volumes of fluid, more consistently, in a<br />
shorter time frame. All of the Certus screens were negative.<br />
Oral fluid drug testing is increasing in popularity in forensic,<br />
clinical, and workplace scenarios. In order to avoid potential<br />
miscarriages of justice or misinterpretation of results, it is essential that<br />
any tests employed for human oral fluid drug screening should provide<br />
results that are accurate. Personnel using oral fluid drug testing devices<br />
should be aware of possible interactions that could provide false positive<br />
results. This presentation highlights the potential for false positive<br />
screening results that may be observed following the collection of oral<br />
fluid after the use of certain food types.<br />
Oral Fluid, Concateno, Orasure<br />
K40 Drugs and Driving Special Scientific<br />
Session: Current Research Related to<br />
Drug-Impaired Driving<br />
Laura J. Liddicoat, BS, Wisconsin State Lab of Hygiene, Forensic<br />
Toxicology Section, 2601 Agriculture Drive, Madison, WI 53707-7996;<br />
Christine Moore, PhD*, Immunalysis Corporation, 829 Towne Center<br />
Drive, Pomona, CA 91767; Alain Verstraete, MD*, University Ghent, UZ<br />
Gent, De Pintelaan 185, Gent, B-9000, BELGIUM; James P. Zacny,<br />
PhD*, University of Chicago, Department of Anesthesia & Critical Care<br />
MC4028, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago,<br />
IL 60637; and Amy K. Miles, BS*, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene,<br />
2601 Agriculture Drive, PO Box 7996, Madison, WI 53707-7996<br />
After attending this presentation, attendees will have a greater<br />
understanding of the prevalence of drug use in drivers and the latest<br />
research findings in the area of drug-impaired driving.<br />
This presentation will impact the forensic science community by<br />
enhancing the understanding of the extent of the drug-impaired driving<br />
problem and providing specific research findings related to several<br />
drugs’ effects on the skills required to safely operate a motor vehicle.<br />
Introduction: A large proportion of the population habitually<br />
drives while taking medical and/or recreational drugs. This special<br />
session will provide information on several research aspects of drug<br />
impairment including surveys that reveal the prevalence of drugs in<br />
United States and European drivers, how drugs may be categorized by<br />
the impairment they cause, recent research findings for specific drugs<br />
using psychopharmacological tests and a drugged-driving case study<br />
involving Tizanidine with assessment by a drug recognition officer.<br />
Topics Include: “National Roadside Survey 2007: Results from<br />
Paired Specimens of Oral Fluid and Whole Blood,” Christine Moore,<br />
* Presenting Author<br />
PhD. This presentation provides an overview of the results pertinent to<br />
drugs detected in paired oral fluid – blood specimens from the National<br />
Roadside Survey (2007) that was conducted at selected sites across the<br />
United States. From night-time drivers, 5,869 oral fluid samples (OF)<br />
and 3,276 blood samples were taken. Of the paired specimens, 559 pairs<br />
showed at least one matrix as drug positive; 326 pairs were positive in<br />
both matrices.<br />
“DRUID Project: Epidemiology Studies of Drug Prevalence in<br />
Europe,” Alain Verstraete, PhD. Recent epidemiology data from surveys<br />
carried out in the European DRUID (Driving under the Influence of<br />
Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines) project to assess the prevalence of<br />
alcohol and other psychoactive substances in drivers in general traffic<br />
(13 countries) and drivers involved in injury accidents (6 countries) will<br />
be presented.<br />
“DRUID Project: A Classification System for Impairing Drugs,”<br />
Alain Verstraete, PhD.<br />
The classification and labeling of medicinal drugs according to their<br />
influence on driving performance is one of the work goals for DRUID.<br />
Dr. Verstraete will present the latest progress on this difficult task.<br />
“Psychomotor and Mood-Altering Effects of CNS-Active Adjuvant<br />
Drugs Used in Treatment of Chronic Nonmalignant Pain, Alone and in<br />
Combination with Oxycodone in Healthy Volunteers,” James P. Zacny,<br />
PhD. Very few research studies have studied the effects of carisoprodol<br />
or pregabalin on psychomotor abilities. Research on the combination of<br />
different drugs is even harder to find. A battery of<br />
psychopharmacological tests will be detailed along with the results of<br />
those tests on healthy volunteers dosed with carisoprodol and pregabalin,<br />
with and without an oral opioid on board.<br />
“Psychomotor and Mood-Altering Effects of Oxycodone and<br />
Ethanol, Alone and in Combination, in Healthy Volunteers,” James P.<br />
Zacny, PhD. Opioid use in the general population has escalated<br />
dramatically in recent years, and the incidence of opioids detected in<br />
drivers has followed a similar pattern. Dr. Zacny will present the results<br />
of an interaction study involving oxycodone and alcohol in<br />
healthy volunteers.<br />
“Analytical and Interpretation Challenges in a Tizanidine DUID<br />
Case,” Amy Miles, BS. Tizanidine is a short-acting muscle relaxer used<br />
for the treatment of muscle spasticity. In this case history the subject was<br />
stopped for impaired driving. A Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) was<br />
called in approximately an hour later to perform the 12-step evaluation.<br />
Upon completion of the evaluation the DRE was unable to find any<br />
impairment but concluded the subject was impaired at the time of the<br />
stop. The case will be discussed in detail including a review of the<br />
analytical challenges posed by this short-acting drug.<br />
Drugs and Driving, Impairment, Forensic Toxicology<br />
K41 Direct LC/MS/MS Quantification of Plasma<br />
Cannabinoids and Their Glucuronides<br />
David M. Schwope, MS*, National Institute of Heath, NIDA, 251<br />
Bayview Boulevard, Suite 200, Room 05A721, Baltimore, MD 21224;<br />
Karl B. Scheidweiler, PhD, National Institute of Heath, NIDA/IRP, 251<br />
Bayview Boulevard, Suite 200, Room 05A721, Baltimore, MD 21224;<br />
and Marilyn A. Huestis, PhD, Chemistry & Drug Metabolism,<br />
Intramural Research, National Institute of Heath, NIDA, 251 Bayview<br />
Boulevard, Room 05A721, Baltimore, MD 21224<br />
After attending this presentation, attendees will be able to describe<br />
an LC/MS/MS method for the simultaneous identification and<br />
quantification of THC, its Phase I metabolites, 11-hydroxy-THC (11-<br />
OH-THC) and 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THCCOOH), other cannabis<br />
constituents, cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabinol (CBN), and its Phase II<br />
metabolites, THC-gluc and THCCOOH-gluc in 0.5 mL human plasma.<br />
This presentation will impact the forensic science community by<br />
offering a novel analytical method for sensitive and specific<br />
22