04.04.2013 Views

FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY - Bio Medical Forensics

FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY - Bio Medical Forensics

FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY - Bio Medical Forensics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Results: The Intercept® device collected an average of 0.55 mL in<br />

the 3 minutes recommended by the manufacturer. The Certus device<br />

has a built-in indicator and we collected an average of 1.15 mL in an<br />

average time of 1.67 minutes. The OF pH was not affected for either<br />

collection device. Presumptive positive Intercept®/Orasure samples<br />

were observed for amphetamine, methamphetamine and cocaine<br />

following consumption of all types of vinegar. Most presumptive<br />

positives were seen at the early time points although a significant number<br />

we also observed out to 30 minutes. The screen positives were submitted<br />

for GC/MS confirmation and found to be confirmation negative – screen<br />

false positives. There was also a depression of the binding for<br />

Intercept®/Orasure samples for opiate and methadone assays although<br />

this was not enough to trigger a positive response against the kit cut off.<br />

By comparison the Certus /Concateno samples were negative for all<br />

vinegar types and time points.<br />

Conclusion: The Orasure Intercept® OF collection device<br />

exhibited many OF false positive after the consumption of various types<br />

of vinegar. There was no significant difference between collection times,<br />

pH, or volume collected. False positive samples out to 30 minutes were<br />

a surprising observation. The Concateno Certus OF collection device<br />

was shown to collect larger volumes of fluid, more consistently, in a<br />

shorter time frame. All of the Certus screens were negative.<br />

Oral fluid drug testing is increasing in popularity in forensic,<br />

clinical, and workplace scenarios. In order to avoid potential<br />

miscarriages of justice or misinterpretation of results, it is essential that<br />

any tests employed for human oral fluid drug screening should provide<br />

results that are accurate. Personnel using oral fluid drug testing devices<br />

should be aware of possible interactions that could provide false positive<br />

results. This presentation highlights the potential for false positive<br />

screening results that may be observed following the collection of oral<br />

fluid after the use of certain food types.<br />

Oral Fluid, Concateno, Orasure<br />

K40 Drugs and Driving Special Scientific<br />

Session: Current Research Related to<br />

Drug-Impaired Driving<br />

Laura J. Liddicoat, BS, Wisconsin State Lab of Hygiene, Forensic<br />

Toxicology Section, 2601 Agriculture Drive, Madison, WI 53707-7996;<br />

Christine Moore, PhD*, Immunalysis Corporation, 829 Towne Center<br />

Drive, Pomona, CA 91767; Alain Verstraete, MD*, University Ghent, UZ<br />

Gent, De Pintelaan 185, Gent, B-9000, BELGIUM; James P. Zacny,<br />

PhD*, University of Chicago, Department of Anesthesia & Critical Care<br />

MC4028, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago,<br />

IL 60637; and Amy K. Miles, BS*, Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene,<br />

2601 Agriculture Drive, PO Box 7996, Madison, WI 53707-7996<br />

After attending this presentation, attendees will have a greater<br />

understanding of the prevalence of drug use in drivers and the latest<br />

research findings in the area of drug-impaired driving.<br />

This presentation will impact the forensic science community by<br />

enhancing the understanding of the extent of the drug-impaired driving<br />

problem and providing specific research findings related to several<br />

drugs’ effects on the skills required to safely operate a motor vehicle.<br />

Introduction: A large proportion of the population habitually<br />

drives while taking medical and/or recreational drugs. This special<br />

session will provide information on several research aspects of drug<br />

impairment including surveys that reveal the prevalence of drugs in<br />

United States and European drivers, how drugs may be categorized by<br />

the impairment they cause, recent research findings for specific drugs<br />

using psychopharmacological tests and a drugged-driving case study<br />

involving Tizanidine with assessment by a drug recognition officer.<br />

Topics Include: “National Roadside Survey 2007: Results from<br />

Paired Specimens of Oral Fluid and Whole Blood,” Christine Moore,<br />

* Presenting Author<br />

PhD. This presentation provides an overview of the results pertinent to<br />

drugs detected in paired oral fluid – blood specimens from the National<br />

Roadside Survey (2007) that was conducted at selected sites across the<br />

United States. From night-time drivers, 5,869 oral fluid samples (OF)<br />

and 3,276 blood samples were taken. Of the paired specimens, 559 pairs<br />

showed at least one matrix as drug positive; 326 pairs were positive in<br />

both matrices.<br />

“DRUID Project: Epidemiology Studies of Drug Prevalence in<br />

Europe,” Alain Verstraete, PhD. Recent epidemiology data from surveys<br />

carried out in the European DRUID (Driving under the Influence of<br />

Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines) project to assess the prevalence of<br />

alcohol and other psychoactive substances in drivers in general traffic<br />

(13 countries) and drivers involved in injury accidents (6 countries) will<br />

be presented.<br />

“DRUID Project: A Classification System for Impairing Drugs,”<br />

Alain Verstraete, PhD.<br />

The classification and labeling of medicinal drugs according to their<br />

influence on driving performance is one of the work goals for DRUID.<br />

Dr. Verstraete will present the latest progress on this difficult task.<br />

“Psychomotor and Mood-Altering Effects of CNS-Active Adjuvant<br />

Drugs Used in Treatment of Chronic Nonmalignant Pain, Alone and in<br />

Combination with Oxycodone in Healthy Volunteers,” James P. Zacny,<br />

PhD. Very few research studies have studied the effects of carisoprodol<br />

or pregabalin on psychomotor abilities. Research on the combination of<br />

different drugs is even harder to find. A battery of<br />

psychopharmacological tests will be detailed along with the results of<br />

those tests on healthy volunteers dosed with carisoprodol and pregabalin,<br />

with and without an oral opioid on board.<br />

“Psychomotor and Mood-Altering Effects of Oxycodone and<br />

Ethanol, Alone and in Combination, in Healthy Volunteers,” James P.<br />

Zacny, PhD. Opioid use in the general population has escalated<br />

dramatically in recent years, and the incidence of opioids detected in<br />

drivers has followed a similar pattern. Dr. Zacny will present the results<br />

of an interaction study involving oxycodone and alcohol in<br />

healthy volunteers.<br />

“Analytical and Interpretation Challenges in a Tizanidine DUID<br />

Case,” Amy Miles, BS. Tizanidine is a short-acting muscle relaxer used<br />

for the treatment of muscle spasticity. In this case history the subject was<br />

stopped for impaired driving. A Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) was<br />

called in approximately an hour later to perform the 12-step evaluation.<br />

Upon completion of the evaluation the DRE was unable to find any<br />

impairment but concluded the subject was impaired at the time of the<br />

stop. The case will be discussed in detail including a review of the<br />

analytical challenges posed by this short-acting drug.<br />

Drugs and Driving, Impairment, Forensic Toxicology<br />

K41 Direct LC/MS/MS Quantification of Plasma<br />

Cannabinoids and Their Glucuronides<br />

David M. Schwope, MS*, National Institute of Heath, NIDA, 251<br />

Bayview Boulevard, Suite 200, Room 05A721, Baltimore, MD 21224;<br />

Karl B. Scheidweiler, PhD, National Institute of Heath, NIDA/IRP, 251<br />

Bayview Boulevard, Suite 200, Room 05A721, Baltimore, MD 21224;<br />

and Marilyn A. Huestis, PhD, Chemistry & Drug Metabolism,<br />

Intramural Research, National Institute of Heath, NIDA, 251 Bayview<br />

Boulevard, Room 05A721, Baltimore, MD 21224<br />

After attending this presentation, attendees will be able to describe<br />

an LC/MS/MS method for the simultaneous identification and<br />

quantification of THC, its Phase I metabolites, 11-hydroxy-THC (11-<br />

OH-THC) and 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THCCOOH), other cannabis<br />

constituents, cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabinol (CBN), and its Phase II<br />

metabolites, THC-gluc and THCCOOH-gluc in 0.5 mL human plasma.<br />

This presentation will impact the forensic science community by<br />

offering a novel analytical method for sensitive and specific<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!