04.04.2013 Views

FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY - Bio Medical Forensics

FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY - Bio Medical Forensics

FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY - Bio Medical Forensics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Facts of the case: RB was a 60-year-old female in good general<br />

health who underwent facial cosmetic surgery and subsequently died<br />

from cardiorespiratory collapse. She had been diagnosed with<br />

depression and was taking Fluoxetine (Prozac ® ) and no other medications.<br />

The medical examiner’s report stated the following: The intubation<br />

went smoothly and she was initially stable from a cardiovascular<br />

point of view. About five minutes into the anesthesia a local anesthetic<br />

consisting of lidocaine, bupivacaine and epinephrine was injected<br />

beneath the skin of the face and scalp. She began to demonstrate cardiovascular<br />

instability …. Heart rate decreased to the 30s and CPR was<br />

begun with return of pulse and blood pressure. She again deteriorated<br />

and was transferred by paramedics to the ER…. Her condition gradually<br />

deteriorated to anoxic encephalopathy and she was pronounced dead<br />

approximately seven hours after the initial cardiovascular collapse.<br />

Toxicology ante- and postmortem lidocaine® and bupivacaine blood<br />

levels were:<br />

Time Ante-Mortem Post-Mortem Blood<br />

Blood Concentrations (mcg/ml) Concentrations (mcg/ml)<br />

Lidocaine® Bupivacaine Lidocaine® Bupivacaine<br />

9:50 a.m. 3.1 0.9<br />

10:34 a.m. 4.5 2.0<br />

4:27 p.m. DEATH<br />

At autopsy: (46 hours after death) 5.3 3.3<br />

Injection sites were identified as follows: “On the midline upper<br />

forehead just below the hairline is a punctuate mark representing a<br />

needle puncture. A second punctuate mark is present on the left lower<br />

forehead just above the lateral end of the left eyebrow. A third punctuate<br />

mark is noted on the left upper lateral cheek just lateral to the lateral<br />

angle of the left eye. Fourth and fifth punctures are noted on the lateral<br />

aspect of the right eye…. A ½ inch area of subcutaneous hemorrhage is<br />

present about the lower of the two puncture marks near the lateral angle<br />

of the right eye.” The <strong>Medical</strong> Examiner also offered the following interpretation<br />

in his report, “Lidocaine® and bupivacaine levels are within<br />

the range previously documented following clinical administration. The<br />

actual mechanism of her cardiorespiratory collapse is unknown.”<br />

Benjamin G. Covino, MD, PhD, was Professor of Anesthesiology at<br />

Harvard <strong>Medical</strong> School and Vice-President of Astra Pharmaceuticals, (a<br />

company that marketed lidocaine® and bupivacaine) from the mid-<br />

1960s through the 1980s and was an internationally-respected expert in<br />

local anesthesia pharmacology and toxicology. Dr. Covino recognized<br />

that bupivacaine was four times as potent as lidocaine® and that toxic<br />

blood levels of lidocaine® ranged from 6-10 mcg/ml while those of<br />

bupivacaine ranged from 1.5-2.5 mcg/ml. Dr. Covino was also the first<br />

investigator to convert blood levels of bupivacaine to “lidocaine® equivalents”<br />

by multiplying the bupivacaine blood level by four and adding<br />

that number to the blood level of lidocaine® to obtain the combined<br />

blood level of both local anesthetic agents in “lidocaine® equivalents”.<br />

Applying the “Covino Algorithm” to the above data, at 9:50 am, a lidocaine®<br />

equivalent level of 6.7 and at 10:34 am, a lidocaine® equivalent<br />

level of 12.5, well into the toxic cardiodepressant level, and rising. The<br />

rapid appearance of bradycardia most likely indicated an initial unintended<br />

intravascular administration followed by continuous absorption<br />

from the infiltrated region resulting in an additive toxic cardiovascular<br />

effect that was further compromised by poor management and<br />

hypoxemia, and resulted in the death of a patient.<br />

Lidocaine®, Bupivacaine, Additive Toxicity<br />

K8 Distribution and Optical Purity of<br />

Methamphetamine Found in Toxic<br />

Concentration in a Civil Aviation<br />

Accident Pilot Fatality<br />

Patrick S. Cardona, BA*, Arvind K. Chaturvedi, PhD, John W. Soper,<br />

PhD, and Dennis V. Canfield, PhD, <strong>Bio</strong>aeronautical Sciences Research<br />

Laboratory (AAM-610), FAA Civil Aerospace <strong>Medical</strong> Institute, PO<br />

Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125-5066<br />

The authors will present toxicological findings of a pilot fatality<br />

involved in a unique methamphetamine-related civil aviation accident to<br />

aid investigations of such accidents.<br />

This presentation will provide information on the distribution of<br />

methamphetamine present in toxic concentration and the stereoselective<br />

analysis of this amine in biological samples.<br />

The Federal Aviation Administration’s Civil Aerospace <strong>Medical</strong><br />

Institute conducts toxicological evaluation of postmortem biological<br />

samples collected from pilots involved in fatal civil aircraft accidents.<br />

The submitted samples are primarily analyzed for the presence of<br />

primary combustion gases, alcohol/volatiles, and drugs. Related to such<br />

an evaluation, findings of a unique aircraft accident are described in this<br />

report. Upon colliding with terrain in weather conditions of poor visibility,<br />

a 1-occupant airplane was substantially damaged with no evidence<br />

of fire. Remains of the pilot were found outside the crashed aircraft.<br />

Pathological examination of the pilot’s body revealed multiple blunt<br />

force injuries and vascular congestion, including subdural hemorrhage<br />

of the cerebral cortex. Autopsied samples—blood, brain, gastric contents,<br />

heart, liver, muscle, spleen, urine, and vitreous fluid—were submitted<br />

for toxicological analysis. The fluorescence polarization<br />

immunoassay disclosed the presence of 8.0 μg/mL amphetamines in<br />

urine. Subsequent gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric confirmatory<br />

analysis determined the presence of methamphetamine (1.134<br />

μg/mL in blood and 59.171 μg/mL in urine) and amphetamine (0.022<br />

μg/mL in blood and 1.495 μg/mL in urine). Both amines were present in<br />

all the submitted sample types, except for amphetamine, which was<br />

detected neither in vitreous fluid nor in muscle. The amount of methamphetamine<br />

found in gastric contents was 575-fold higher than that of<br />

amphetamine. Stereochemical analyses of gastric contents, blood, and<br />

urine using a chiral probe, (S)-(–)-N-(trifluoroacetyl)prolyl chloride,<br />

indicated that methamphetamine detected in the sample types was not<br />

optically pure. In gastric contents and urine, this secondary amine’s<br />

optical isomers were present in equal proportions. The enantiomeric<br />

excess of (+)-methamphetamine over its (–)-form was about 32% in<br />

blood. Both optical forms of amphetamine were present in the ratio of<br />

1.2–1.5:1.0 in the 3 sample types. The blood methamphetamine concentration<br />

found was in the range sufficient to produce toxic effects,<br />

including performance impairment. The observed variation in the ratios<br />

of amine isomer concentrations in the sample types would have been<br />

attributed to stereoselective metabolic and other pharmacokinetic<br />

processes. Findings of this study supported the conclusion of the<br />

National Transportation Safety Board that, in addition to the visibilityassociated<br />

adverse meteorological conditions, the use of the controlled<br />

substance played a contributory role in the causation of the aircraft<br />

accident.<br />

Forensic Toxicology, Methamphetamine, Stereochemical Analyses<br />

205 * Presenting Author

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!