07.04.2013 Views

Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers

Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers

Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

David Moser, "<strong>Slips</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tongue</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pen</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese"<br />

or perhaps: - L<br />

bye-bye)<br />

S<strong>in</strong>o-<strong>Platonic</strong> <strong>Papers</strong>, no. 22 (March 1991)<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fourth tone borrowed from <strong>the</strong> character $(z'ai) as <strong>in</strong> "z'aiji'anY<br />

("goodbye").<br />

One might assume that errors <strong>in</strong> speech production <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g tone<br />

would occasionally give rise to tonal hybrids or splices that differ from <strong>the</strong><br />

usual suprasegmental characteristics <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese. However, <strong>the</strong>re is a ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

well-accepted pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> errors known as Well's First Law<br />

(Wells, 1951) which says that phonemes appear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> speech errors are<br />

always consistent with <strong>the</strong> phonological rules <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> language. One almost<br />

never f<strong>in</strong>ds a phoneme <strong>in</strong> a slip <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tongue that is not heard <strong>in</strong> regular<br />

utterances. For <strong>in</strong>stance, a spoonerism <strong>of</strong> "spoon <strong>and</strong> fork" might result <strong>in</strong><br />

"foon <strong>and</strong> spork" but never "fpoon <strong>and</strong> sork". Similarly, it seems likely that<br />

<strong>the</strong> four tones <strong>of</strong> M<strong>and</strong>ar<strong>in</strong>, hav<strong>in</strong>g basically <strong>the</strong> same status as segmental<br />

phonemes, can be exchanged, perseverated, anticipated, etc., but would<br />

seldom appear <strong>in</strong> hybrid forms that are not part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> language. My<br />

modest corpus <strong>of</strong> errors conta<strong>in</strong>s no counter examples, but it is difficult for<br />

me as a non-native speaker to verify this conjecture personally.<br />

Sometimes <strong>the</strong> anticipation merely phonetically <strong>in</strong>fluences <strong>the</strong> word <strong>in</strong><br />

question ra<strong>the</strong>r than mask<strong>in</strong>g it:<br />

Ex. 16. ''k $ E % 5 5 a & zhzng 3 z<br />

n-J ??'<br />

m m m ,g,<br />

3 3<br />

"~~GrbZiqii<strong>of</strong>a bfishi ~~li6n de *zhzngshIiji... zGngshTIj1 ma?" ("Isn't<br />

Gorbachev <strong>the</strong> General Secretary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union?")<br />

The preparation for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial retr<strong>of</strong>lex consonant <strong>of</strong> "shU" (3 ) <strong>in</strong>terfered<br />

with <strong>the</strong> pronunciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial dental sibilant <strong>of</strong> "zzng' result<strong>in</strong>g -<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> syllable ''zhzng". Such an error probably does not result from any<br />

k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> placement error <strong>in</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g, but ra<strong>the</strong>r is a result <strong>of</strong> much<br />

lower-level error <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> a motor comm<strong>and</strong> after <strong>the</strong> sentence<br />

was already completely formulated.<br />

Garrett (1 975) identified four generalizations about speech errors, one<br />

<strong>of</strong> which was that <strong>in</strong>terfer<strong>in</strong>g or mask<strong>in</strong>g elements tend to come from<br />

correspond<strong>in</strong>g or isomorphic locations <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sentence; that is, beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

segments tend to mask o<strong>the</strong>r beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g segments, middle segments mask<br />

middle segments, etc. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, if two polysyllabic words are <strong>in</strong>volved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!