07.04.2013 Views

Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers

Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers

Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

David Moser, "<strong>Slips</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tongue</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pen</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese" S<strong>in</strong>o-<strong>Platonic</strong> <strong>Papers</strong>, no. 22 (March 1991)<br />

analyzed as a blend <strong>of</strong> "You'll have to talk to <strong>the</strong> guy who waters <strong>the</strong><br />

garden" <strong>and</strong> "You'll have to talk to <strong>the</strong> gardener". The follow<strong>in</strong>g is a<br />

somewhat isomorphic example <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese:<br />

EX. 52. L6 ap + 5 3 .?,<br />

"~'eige k3i siji de .. .' ("That driver..."; literally, "driver <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> driver")<br />

The word "siji" (3 fi, "driver"), seems to have substituted for <strong>the</strong> word<br />

"ch8" (q, "car"), but it is also possible that <strong>the</strong> phrase is merely a blend <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> words "k3ich8deN (R mjtJ, "<strong>the</strong> one who drives <strong>the</strong> car"), <strong>and</strong> "siji"<br />

(3<br />

Substitution errors are <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g examples <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> phenomenon<br />

<strong>of</strong> spread<strong>in</strong>g activation, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten reveal aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> "semantic halo" <strong>of</strong><br />

associated concepts that surround each word. For example, <strong>the</strong> substitution<br />

<strong>of</strong> "pliers" for "scissors" above is hardly a r<strong>and</strong>om <strong>in</strong>trusion; <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong><br />

"pliers" is clearly a close neighbor<strong>in</strong>g concept to that <strong>of</strong> "scissors". (This<br />

issue is dealt with fur<strong>the</strong>r below. See Aitchison, 1987, Dell & Reich, 1980,<br />

<strong>and</strong> H<strong>of</strong>stadter, 1985 for more on <strong>the</strong>se ideas.)<br />

2.7. Errors <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g haplology (z i.)<br />

The phenomenon <strong>of</strong> haplology <strong>in</strong>volves <strong>the</strong> collaps<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> two<br />

successive words or phrases <strong>in</strong>to one, <strong>in</strong>variably with some truncation or<br />

loss <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation at <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> union <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two elements:<br />

Ex. 53. "Here's Mozart symphony number *tw<strong>in</strong>e... twen ty -n<strong>in</strong>e."<br />

Ex. 54. "If you're will<strong>in</strong>g to go through some *momenterror... momentary<br />

terror, you'll be okay."<br />

This sort <strong>of</strong> process <strong>of</strong> "fusion" <strong>of</strong>ten occurs at a po<strong>in</strong>t where <strong>the</strong> two words<br />

share a common phoneme, as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last example, but this is by no means<br />

always <strong>the</strong> case.<br />

The follow<strong>in</strong>g is a similar error <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese:<br />

*kgng... hgn kgngng ch3ogub y> bzi y> ~giyu6n.' ("There's noth<strong>in</strong>g to worry<br />

about with <strong>the</strong> economy; if imports don't <strong>in</strong>crease, <strong>the</strong> trade balance will<br />

very likely be more than ten billion American dollars.")

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!