Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers
Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers
Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
David Moser, "<strong>Slips</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tongue</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pen</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese" S<strong>in</strong>o-<strong>Platonic</strong> <strong>Papers</strong>, no. 22 (March 1991)<br />
analyzed as a blend <strong>of</strong> "You'll have to talk to <strong>the</strong> guy who waters <strong>the</strong><br />
garden" <strong>and</strong> "You'll have to talk to <strong>the</strong> gardener". The follow<strong>in</strong>g is a<br />
somewhat isomorphic example <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese:<br />
EX. 52. L6 ap + 5 3 .?,<br />
"~'eige k3i siji de .. .' ("That driver..."; literally, "driver <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> driver")<br />
The word "siji" (3 fi, "driver"), seems to have substituted for <strong>the</strong> word<br />
"ch8" (q, "car"), but it is also possible that <strong>the</strong> phrase is merely a blend <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> words "k3ich8deN (R mjtJ, "<strong>the</strong> one who drives <strong>the</strong> car"), <strong>and</strong> "siji"<br />
(3<br />
Substitution errors are <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g examples <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> phenomenon<br />
<strong>of</strong> spread<strong>in</strong>g activation, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten reveal aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> "semantic halo" <strong>of</strong><br />
associated concepts that surround each word. For example, <strong>the</strong> substitution<br />
<strong>of</strong> "pliers" for "scissors" above is hardly a r<strong>and</strong>om <strong>in</strong>trusion; <strong>the</strong> concept <strong>of</strong><br />
"pliers" is clearly a close neighbor<strong>in</strong>g concept to that <strong>of</strong> "scissors". (This<br />
issue is dealt with fur<strong>the</strong>r below. See Aitchison, 1987, Dell & Reich, 1980,<br />
<strong>and</strong> H<strong>of</strong>stadter, 1985 for more on <strong>the</strong>se ideas.)<br />
2.7. Errors <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g haplology (z i.)<br />
The phenomenon <strong>of</strong> haplology <strong>in</strong>volves <strong>the</strong> collaps<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> two<br />
successive words or phrases <strong>in</strong>to one, <strong>in</strong>variably with some truncation or<br />
loss <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation at <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> union <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two elements:<br />
Ex. 53. "Here's Mozart symphony number *tw<strong>in</strong>e... twen ty -n<strong>in</strong>e."<br />
Ex. 54. "If you're will<strong>in</strong>g to go through some *momenterror... momentary<br />
terror, you'll be okay."<br />
This sort <strong>of</strong> process <strong>of</strong> "fusion" <strong>of</strong>ten occurs at a po<strong>in</strong>t where <strong>the</strong> two words<br />
share a common phoneme, as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last example, but this is by no means<br />
always <strong>the</strong> case.<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g is a similar error <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese:<br />
*kgng... hgn kgngng ch3ogub y> bzi y> ~giyu6n.' ("There's noth<strong>in</strong>g to worry<br />
about with <strong>the</strong> economy; if imports don't <strong>in</strong>crease, <strong>the</strong> trade balance will<br />
very likely be more than ten billion American dollars.")