07.04.2013 Views

Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers

Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers

Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

David Moser, "<strong>Slips</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tongue</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pen</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese" S<strong>in</strong>o-<strong>Platonic</strong> <strong>Papers</strong>, no. 22 (March 199 1 )<br />

any money. Before f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g a job, you should...")<br />

Here <strong>the</strong> homophonic character (qi<strong>in</strong>,"money") was substituted for<br />

(qi6n. "before"), but <strong>the</strong> error was clearly facilitated by <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong><br />

concept <strong>of</strong> "money" was already highly active <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> character for <strong>the</strong><br />

concept had just been written. The slip could also be classified as a<br />

straightforward perseveration error, but it is likely that all three factors -<br />

perseveration, spread<strong>in</strong>g activation, as well as simple homophonic<br />

substitution - contributed someth<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> result.<br />

There has been much debate about <strong>the</strong> extent to which speakers <strong>of</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese utilize <strong>the</strong> phonetic <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese characters <strong>in</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

or produc<strong>in</strong>g written text. DeFrancis (1984, 1989), Hung & Tzeng (1981),<br />

<strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs have argued that, despite its reputation to <strong>the</strong> contrary, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />

script is by any def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> term a phonetic script, <strong>and</strong> native<br />

speakers can thus be expected to use <strong>the</strong> same k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> mechanisms for<br />

retriev<strong>in</strong>g, writ<strong>in</strong>g, or phonetically recod<strong>in</strong>g Ch<strong>in</strong>ese characters as speakers<br />

<strong>of</strong> English use <strong>in</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g English text. Much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evidence from<br />

written errors <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese also seems to support this view, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous<br />

three examples <strong>in</strong>dicate that <strong>the</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g strategies used by writers <strong>of</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese characters are similar to those employed by writers <strong>of</strong> English <strong>and</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r alphabetic scripts.<br />

If a target word, once retrieved, waits <strong>in</strong> short-term memory long<br />

enough, very <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>the</strong> result is partial forgett<strong>in</strong>g or "phonetic decay" - a<br />

loss or degradation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> phonological <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> word<br />

(Hotopf,1983). The follow<strong>in</strong>g are a few examples <strong>in</strong> English from written<br />

texts:<br />

Ex. 71. "...particularly with this letter ..." (with this wea<strong>the</strong>r)<br />

Ex. 72. "I might as well tw<strong>in</strong> around <strong>and</strong> do it aga<strong>in</strong>." (turn around)<br />

Ex. 73. "Okay, so far, f<strong>in</strong>d." (so far, f<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

Here as well, we f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> same phenomenon <strong>in</strong> written Ch<strong>in</strong>ese:<br />

EX. 74. "I$ **<br />

$$ UE,*q 2 8 A @ @I {$." (a E)<br />

"NY xian 16i ba, *kgd<strong>in</strong>g hbi y6u r6n b3ngzh'u n'i.' ("Just come, <strong>the</strong>re will<br />

certa<strong>in</strong>ly be someone to help you.")<br />

It seems clear that what was lost here <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> phonetic decay was<br />

<strong>the</strong> end<strong>in</strong>g consonant /n/ <strong>of</strong> "kgn' (R) result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> substitution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!