Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers
Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers
Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
David Moser, "<strong>Slips</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tongue</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pen</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese" S<strong>in</strong>o-<strong>Platonic</strong> <strong>Papers</strong>, no. 22 (March 199 1 )<br />
any money. Before f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g a job, you should...")<br />
Here <strong>the</strong> homophonic character (qi<strong>in</strong>,"money") was substituted for<br />
(qi6n. "before"), but <strong>the</strong> error was clearly facilitated by <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong><br />
concept <strong>of</strong> "money" was already highly active <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> character for <strong>the</strong><br />
concept had just been written. The slip could also be classified as a<br />
straightforward perseveration error, but it is likely that all three factors -<br />
perseveration, spread<strong>in</strong>g activation, as well as simple homophonic<br />
substitution - contributed someth<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> result.<br />
There has been much debate about <strong>the</strong> extent to which speakers <strong>of</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese utilize <strong>the</strong> phonetic <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese characters <strong>in</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g<br />
or produc<strong>in</strong>g written text. DeFrancis (1984, 1989), Hung & Tzeng (1981),<br />
<strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs have argued that, despite its reputation to <strong>the</strong> contrary, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />
script is by any def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> term a phonetic script, <strong>and</strong> native<br />
speakers can thus be expected to use <strong>the</strong> same k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> mechanisms for<br />
retriev<strong>in</strong>g, writ<strong>in</strong>g, or phonetically recod<strong>in</strong>g Ch<strong>in</strong>ese characters as speakers<br />
<strong>of</strong> English use <strong>in</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g English text. Much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evidence from<br />
written errors <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese also seems to support this view, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous<br />
three examples <strong>in</strong>dicate that <strong>the</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g strategies used by writers <strong>of</strong><br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese characters are similar to those employed by writers <strong>of</strong> English <strong>and</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r alphabetic scripts.<br />
If a target word, once retrieved, waits <strong>in</strong> short-term memory long<br />
enough, very <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>the</strong> result is partial forgett<strong>in</strong>g or "phonetic decay" - a<br />
loss or degradation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> phonological <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> word<br />
(Hotopf,1983). The follow<strong>in</strong>g are a few examples <strong>in</strong> English from written<br />
texts:<br />
Ex. 71. "...particularly with this letter ..." (with this wea<strong>the</strong>r)<br />
Ex. 72. "I might as well tw<strong>in</strong> around <strong>and</strong> do it aga<strong>in</strong>." (turn around)<br />
Ex. 73. "Okay, so far, f<strong>in</strong>d." (so far, f<strong>in</strong>e)<br />
Here as well, we f<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> same phenomenon <strong>in</strong> written Ch<strong>in</strong>ese:<br />
EX. 74. "I$ **<br />
$$ UE,*q 2 8 A @ @I {$." (a E)<br />
"NY xian 16i ba, *kgd<strong>in</strong>g hbi y6u r6n b3ngzh'u n'i.' ("Just come, <strong>the</strong>re will<br />
certa<strong>in</strong>ly be someone to help you.")<br />
It seems clear that what was lost here <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> phonetic decay was<br />
<strong>the</strong> end<strong>in</strong>g consonant /n/ <strong>of</strong> "kgn' (R) result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> substitution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>