07.04.2013 Views

Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers

Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers

Slips of the Tongue and Pen in Chinese - Sino-Platonic Papers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

David Moser, "<strong>Slips</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Tongue</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Pen</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese" S<strong>in</strong>o-<strong>Platonic</strong> <strong>Papers</strong>, no. 22 (March 199 1)<br />

Written anticipation errors basically come <strong>in</strong> two types: those that are<br />

a result <strong>of</strong> a process<strong>in</strong>g mistake <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> order<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sentence, <strong>and</strong> those<br />

that are <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong> errors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> motor comm<strong>and</strong>s <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The mechanisms <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> first type are usually ra<strong>the</strong>r high-level<br />

ones that only <strong>in</strong>cidentally <strong>in</strong>volve writ<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> issues raised <strong>in</strong> such<br />

errors are not much different from those raised <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong><br />

spoken anticipations. The second type is more low-level <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>volves <strong>the</strong><br />

character components <strong>the</strong>mselves, or o<strong>the</strong>r aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g system.<br />

We will deal only with <strong>the</strong> second type here.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most common k<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> written anticipation errors is when a<br />

character component about to be written appears prematurely, usually <strong>in</strong><br />

part due to some visual similarity to <strong>the</strong> target component:<br />

3 9,<br />

Ex* 85- ''g * ($2 g ,%)<br />

"Zhgn me'i [yisi I" ("Really un[<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g] .")<br />

The El component <strong>of</strong> g, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> component <strong>of</strong> ,g share <strong>the</strong> same<br />

rectangular outl<strong>in</strong>e (<strong>the</strong> first three strokes are exactly <strong>the</strong> same), <strong>and</strong> this<br />

caused <strong>the</strong> component a to be anticipated. Note that this state <strong>of</strong> affairs<br />

has someth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> common with a capture error, though a capture error does<br />

not typically <strong>in</strong>volve <strong>in</strong>terference from a word or shape already <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

- process<strong>in</strong>g stack wait<strong>in</strong>g to be executed.<br />

If a character component has to be repeated two or three times <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

writ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a character, this can contribute to <strong>the</strong> component be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

anticipated:<br />

.J\<br />

Ex* 86. &&;ei ij IyJ 8 5 El ;fs 4% ,y<br />

"Xifang de y<strong>in</strong>yu\e ne, y6u xigo [tiq<strong>in</strong>]<br />

viol<strong>in</strong> I...')<br />

(.J\ t: F)<br />

...' ("As for Western music, <strong>the</strong>re's [<strong>the</strong><br />

The implicit knowledge that two <strong>in</strong>stances <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> component 5 were about<br />

to be written caused a premature motor comm<strong>and</strong> to execute <strong>the</strong><br />

component dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> writ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> $g.<br />

Ex. 87. "f&F ag,f& " (B @ 3<br />

"Ta bfich'mg, t3 [sgngzi I..' ("He didn't s<strong>in</strong>g, his [voice] ...")<br />

Similarly, <strong>the</strong> character component was anticipated as <strong>the</strong> writer began<br />

to write @.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!