Harmful traditional practices, (male circumcision - Electronic Thesis ...
Harmful traditional practices, (male circumcision - Electronic Thesis ...
Harmful traditional practices, (male circumcision - Electronic Thesis ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
57<br />
studs. The appellant in this case argued that the wearing of a nose stud was an<br />
established tradition in her family as well as Indian culture and that her daughter<br />
did not wear a nose stud as a fashion statement. 193 In its finding that the<br />
decision of the governing body unreasonably and unjustifiably infringed the right<br />
of the appellant’s daughter to culture and religion, the court made the following<br />
submission;<br />
“A ban against the wearing of a nose stud undermines the value of religious and cultural<br />
symbols and sends learners the message that religious beliefs and cultural <strong>practices</strong> do<br />
not merit the same protection as other rights and freedoms. If the school<br />
accommodates appellant’s daughter and allows her to wear the nose stud it would<br />
demonstrate the importance that our society attaches to protecting religious and cultural<br />
rights or freedoms and to showing respect for its minorities.” 194<br />
The minority decision in the Prince case above as well as the decision of the<br />
court in Pillay discussed above are two examples of the commitment to protect<br />
the rights of vulnerable groups in society. In the Christian Education case the<br />
court emphasized the cultural context where children as vulnerable groups in<br />
society rely on the state to put in place measures aimed at preventing abuse,<br />
violence and maltreatment of children. As such, the Constitutional Court has<br />
provided guidance to other courts that where culture and religion have the<br />
potential to harm the rights of children, the rights of children to be protected<br />
should prevail.<br />
In my opinion the potential harmful consequences of virginity testing which has<br />
been discussed in great detail in chapter 1 of this paper far outweigh the benefits<br />
as proposed by those in favour of the practice. The practice has the potential to<br />
infringe a number of fundamental rights of girl children including the right to<br />
non-discrimination, physical integrity, dignity and privacy. As such, it is<br />
193 para 7.<br />
194 para 35.