09.04.2013 Views

Harmful traditional practices, (male circumcision - Electronic Thesis ...

Harmful traditional practices, (male circumcision - Electronic Thesis ...

Harmful traditional practices, (male circumcision - Electronic Thesis ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

57<br />

studs. The appellant in this case argued that the wearing of a nose stud was an<br />

established tradition in her family as well as Indian culture and that her daughter<br />

did not wear a nose stud as a fashion statement. 193 In its finding that the<br />

decision of the governing body unreasonably and unjustifiably infringed the right<br />

of the appellant’s daughter to culture and religion, the court made the following<br />

submission;<br />

“A ban against the wearing of a nose stud undermines the value of religious and cultural<br />

symbols and sends learners the message that religious beliefs and cultural <strong>practices</strong> do<br />

not merit the same protection as other rights and freedoms. If the school<br />

accommodates appellant’s daughter and allows her to wear the nose stud it would<br />

demonstrate the importance that our society attaches to protecting religious and cultural<br />

rights or freedoms and to showing respect for its minorities.” 194<br />

The minority decision in the Prince case above as well as the decision of the<br />

court in Pillay discussed above are two examples of the commitment to protect<br />

the rights of vulnerable groups in society. In the Christian Education case the<br />

court emphasized the cultural context where children as vulnerable groups in<br />

society rely on the state to put in place measures aimed at preventing abuse,<br />

violence and maltreatment of children. As such, the Constitutional Court has<br />

provided guidance to other courts that where culture and religion have the<br />

potential to harm the rights of children, the rights of children to be protected<br />

should prevail.<br />

In my opinion the potential harmful consequences of virginity testing which has<br />

been discussed in great detail in chapter 1 of this paper far outweigh the benefits<br />

as proposed by those in favour of the practice. The practice has the potential to<br />

infringe a number of fundamental rights of girl children including the right to<br />

non-discrimination, physical integrity, dignity and privacy. As such, it is<br />

193 para 7.<br />

194 para 35.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!