09.04.2013 Views

Harmful traditional practices, (male circumcision - Electronic Thesis ...

Harmful traditional practices, (male circumcision - Electronic Thesis ...

Harmful traditional practices, (male circumcision - Electronic Thesis ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

61<br />

After listening to submissions in August 2004 from 30 children’s sector<br />

organizations, including two groups of children, which highlighted a number of<br />

gaps in the delivery of services to children, the Portfolio Committee on Social<br />

Development spent the next 6 months calling for inputs, gathering information<br />

and deliberating on the clauses in the Children’s Bill. 197 On the 12 th and 13 th of<br />

April 2004, experts from academia, the Children’s Bill Working Group, Traditional<br />

Leaders and the Justice Department were requested to give expert advice on<br />

how to resolve contentious areas in the Bill. 198 Virginity testing and <strong>male</strong><br />

<strong>circumcision</strong> were included in the issues that needed to be discussed at this<br />

workshop. 199 A revised version of the Bill was prepared and then passed by the<br />

National Assembly in June 2005. 200<br />

1.2.1 Amendments proposed by the National Assembly.<br />

The National Assembly (NA) effected a number of changes to clause 12 of the<br />

Bill in June 2005. 201 When the Bill went back to the National Council of<br />

Provinces (NCOP), a number of amendments were proposed in response to the<br />

proposals by the NA. These amendments will be discussed in the ensuing<br />

section.<br />

197<br />

Proudlock P, “No Second-Best Law for Children” at p 3. Available online at<br />

http://www.childrenfirst.org.za/shownews?modecontent&id=24772&refto=4742. Accessed on 5<br />

October 2006.<br />

198<br />

Ibid at p 3.<br />

199<br />

Ibid at p 3.<br />

200<br />

See fn 196 above at p 23.<br />

201<br />

See Jamieson L and Proudlock P, “Children’s Bill Progress Update: Report on amendments<br />

made by the Portfolio Committee on Social Development”, at p 11. Available online at<br />

http://web.uct.ac.za/depts/ci/plr/pdf/progress/27June2005doc. Accessed on 10 October 2006.<br />

The following changes were proposed:<br />

“12(1) Every child has the right not to be subjected to social, cultural and religious<br />

<strong>practices</strong> which are detrimental to the well-being, health or dignity of the child.<br />

(4) Virginity testing has been banned outright,<br />

(5) Every <strong>male</strong> child has the right to refuse <strong>circumcision</strong>.<br />

(6) Any person who performs FMG, virginity testing, or <strong>circumcision</strong> where consent was<br />

refused, is guilty of an offence as is the person who is obliged to protect the child<br />

from abuse.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!