Harmful traditional practices, (male circumcision - Electronic Thesis ...
Harmful traditional practices, (male circumcision - Electronic Thesis ...
Harmful traditional practices, (male circumcision - Electronic Thesis ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
61<br />
After listening to submissions in August 2004 from 30 children’s sector<br />
organizations, including two groups of children, which highlighted a number of<br />
gaps in the delivery of services to children, the Portfolio Committee on Social<br />
Development spent the next 6 months calling for inputs, gathering information<br />
and deliberating on the clauses in the Children’s Bill. 197 On the 12 th and 13 th of<br />
April 2004, experts from academia, the Children’s Bill Working Group, Traditional<br />
Leaders and the Justice Department were requested to give expert advice on<br />
how to resolve contentious areas in the Bill. 198 Virginity testing and <strong>male</strong><br />
<strong>circumcision</strong> were included in the issues that needed to be discussed at this<br />
workshop. 199 A revised version of the Bill was prepared and then passed by the<br />
National Assembly in June 2005. 200<br />
1.2.1 Amendments proposed by the National Assembly.<br />
The National Assembly (NA) effected a number of changes to clause 12 of the<br />
Bill in June 2005. 201 When the Bill went back to the National Council of<br />
Provinces (NCOP), a number of amendments were proposed in response to the<br />
proposals by the NA. These amendments will be discussed in the ensuing<br />
section.<br />
197<br />
Proudlock P, “No Second-Best Law for Children” at p 3. Available online at<br />
http://www.childrenfirst.org.za/shownews?modecontent&id=24772&refto=4742. Accessed on 5<br />
October 2006.<br />
198<br />
Ibid at p 3.<br />
199<br />
Ibid at p 3.<br />
200<br />
See fn 196 above at p 23.<br />
201<br />
See Jamieson L and Proudlock P, “Children’s Bill Progress Update: Report on amendments<br />
made by the Portfolio Committee on Social Development”, at p 11. Available online at<br />
http://web.uct.ac.za/depts/ci/plr/pdf/progress/27June2005doc. Accessed on 10 October 2006.<br />
The following changes were proposed:<br />
“12(1) Every child has the right not to be subjected to social, cultural and religious<br />
<strong>practices</strong> which are detrimental to the well-being, health or dignity of the child.<br />
(4) Virginity testing has been banned outright,<br />
(5) Every <strong>male</strong> child has the right to refuse <strong>circumcision</strong>.<br />
(6) Any person who performs FMG, virginity testing, or <strong>circumcision</strong> where consent was<br />
refused, is guilty of an offence as is the person who is obliged to protect the child<br />
from abuse.”