Biblioteca Esoterica Esonet.ORG http://www.esonet.ORG 1
Biblioteca Esoterica Esonet.ORG http://www.esonet.ORG 1
Biblioteca Esoterica Esonet.ORG http://www.esonet.ORG 1
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Biblioteca</strong> <strong>Esoterica</strong> <strong>Esonet</strong>.<strong>ORG</strong><br />
<strong>http</strong>://<strong>www</strong>.<strong>esonet</strong>.<strong>ORG</strong><br />
to discover certain crucial facts his superiors need to know, performs a dangerous act on<br />
behalf of his or her national "greater whole." If caught, such a person may remain silent<br />
even while being tortured — his or her individual will steeled by the realization that the<br />
fate of the nation depends on such courage. Yet his or her commander in the home office<br />
or the White House, though a superior in a vertical sociopolitical relationship, may be a<br />
rather insignificant or pompous person in the horizontal civilian relationship of person to<br />
person.<br />
In other words, at the cultural and sociopolitical level, the quality of the person may<br />
not match the power of the office. Social, political, religious, and corporate hierarchies<br />
concern offices, not persons. Human beings working at lower hierarchical levels need not<br />
as persons feel inferior to the top executives. These vertical relationships link offices and<br />
functions, not people per se. Nevertheless, the relationship between an executive and an<br />
employee also may have very personal, horizontal elements; and when this occurs, a<br />
deeply confusing situation is created. The more the social class system is abolished, the<br />
greater the confusion, especially if the sociopolitical organization has a de facto totalitarian<br />
character.<br />
When I speak of vertical relationships, I am not referring to such ambiguous social<br />
situations but to interactions between two definite and unquestionably different levels of<br />
evolutionary development. The difference of levels is not merely a matter of offices with<br />
accompanying titles, uniforms, or other badges of social power or wealth, but one of<br />
essential being. It cannot be measured quantitatively, for it implies having passed through<br />
a process of radical, qualitative transformation. And the fact that such a transformation<br />
has occurred is evident to all who also have experienced such a process. It does not have<br />
to be "certified" by sociocultural or religious documents.<br />
141