xiv <strong>THE</strong> <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>YORK</strong> <strong>STATE</strong> <strong>LEGISLATIVE</strong> <strong>PROCESS</strong>: <strong>AN</strong> EVALUATION <strong>AN</strong>D BLUEPRINT FOR REFORM with 3,899 staffers,” of any state legislature in the country. 5 Member Funding Used to Punish Disloyalty. Because the Speaker and Majority Leader can control each member’s funding for staff and office operations, members are discouraged from challenging their leader’s approach to specific legislation or to procedural rules. This reality prevents members from advocating for any changes to the procedural rules that could lessen the authority of the chambers’ leader, regardless of the merits of such changes. ■■ PROPOSED RULES CH<strong>AN</strong>GES: ■ Each member shall be limited to introducing 20 bills in the Assembly and 30 bills in the Senate in each session. 6 ■ No member shall be assigned to more than three committees during a legislative session. ■ All members shall receive equal funding for the operating costs and staff of their individual offices, regardless of the member’s party affiliation or seniority. 1 ABNER J. MIKVA & ERIC L<strong>AN</strong>E, <strong>LEGISLATIVE</strong> <strong>PROCESS</strong> 207 (2d ed. 2002). 2 Every year, the editors of McKinney’s Session Law News of New York identify and publish a list of those laws enacted in the prior year and determined to be “major legislation.” For the purposes of this study, we have analyzed the “major legislation” passed from 1997 through 2001. See MCKINNEY’S SESSION LAW <strong>NEW</strong>S OF <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>YORK</strong> (1997-2001). Although 310 laws were identified by McKinney’s, two of those laws (S70001 and S70002) were not listed in the Legislative Digest for the years in question. Accordingly, we did not include those two laws in our analysis of major legislation. 3 Professional legislatures (California, Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin) are defined through an index of legislative professionalism presented in SARAH MCCALLY MOREHOUSE & MALCOLM E. JEWELL, <strong>STATE</strong> POLITICS, PARTIES, <strong>AN</strong>D POLICY 212-13 (2d ed. 2003). The use of this cohort as a benchmark against which to assess the New York State Legislature was suggested to us by Gerald Benjamin, Reform in New York: The Budget, the Legislature, and the Governance Process (Background Document Prepared for a Citizens Budget Commission Conference, “Fixing New York State’s Fiscal Practices, Nov. 13-14, 2003), at http://cbcny.org/. See also Keith F. Hamm & Gary F. Moncreif, Legislative Politics in the States, in POLITICS IN <strong>THE</strong> AMERIC<strong>AN</strong> <strong>STATE</strong>S 157-58 (Virginia Gray & Russell L. Hanson eds., 8th ed. 2003). 4 N.Y. Const. Art. III, § 14 5 ROBERT WARD, <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>YORK</strong> <strong>STATE</strong> GOVERNMENT: WHAT IT DOES, HOW IT WORKS 108 (Rockefeller Institute Press 2002). 6 This limitation shall apply only to introductions as sole or prime sponsor, and shall not apply to: resolutions, floor amendments, or budget bills; emergency introductions at the request of the Governor; bills requested to be brought to the floor for "same as" bill consideration; departmental bills; or to "local bills" submitted through a member at the request of a county or municipal government.
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>NEW</strong> <strong>YORK</strong> <strong>STATE</strong> <strong>LEGISLATIVE</strong> <strong>PROCESS</strong>: <strong>AN</strong> EVALUATION <strong>AN</strong>D BLUEPRINT FOR REFORM
- Page 1: THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATIVE PROC
- Page 4 and 5: The Brennan Center for Justice at N
- Page 7: CONTENTS Executive Summary. . . . .
- Page 10 and 11: viii THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATIVE
- Page 12 and 13: x THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATIVE PR
- Page 14 and 15: xii THE NEW YORK STATE LEGISLATIVE
- Page 19 and 20: INTRODUCTION It has become somethin
- Page 21 and 22: ■ Accessibility. An accessible le
- Page 23 and 24: NEW YORK STATE’S LEGISLATIVE PROC
- Page 25 and 26: ■■ REFERRAL OF LEGISLATION TO C
- Page 27 and 28: legislation. As a result, the final
- Page 29 and 30: ■■ COMMITTEE REPORTS Legislatur
- Page 31 and 32: usually adopted by the full committ
- Page 33 and 34: Neither of New York State’s two c
- Page 35 and 36: FIGURE 5 RESTRICTIONS ON MOTIONS TO
- Page 37 and 38: that is overturned; this allows the
- Page 39 and 40: of these committees. 142 In 1971, a
- Page 41 and 42: into, a bill because the committee
- Page 43 and 44: Additional research is necessary to
- Page 45 and 46: Finally, analysis of the outcomes o
- Page 47 and 48: maybe 20 staff people saw it before
- Page 49 and 50: Few other states rely so heavily up
- Page 51 and 52: Both the fast roll call (also known
- Page 53 and 54: that the leaders exert over which b
- Page 55 and 56: Nor is this pattern a recent phenom
- Page 57 and 58: A COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF NEW YORK
- Page 59 and 60: State A COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF LEGI
- Page 61 and 62: THE IMPACT OF NEW YORK’S DYSFUNCT
- Page 63 and 64: THE IMPACT OF NEW YORK’S DYSFUNCT
- Page 65 and 66: THE IMPACT OF NEW YORK’S DYSFUNCT
- Page 67 and 68:
THE IMPACT OF NEW YORK’S DYSFUNCT
- Page 69 and 70:
the people of New York State by acq
- Page 71 and 72:
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REFORM The refo
- Page 73 and 74:
■ Motions to discharge a bill may
- Page 75 and 76:
ENDNOTES 1 See, e.g., Albany’s Ad
- Page 77 and 78:
the New York State Legislature was
- Page 79 and 80:
41 MAJOR LEGISLATION COMMITTEE ANAL
- Page 81 and 82:
Fin. Network, Inc., 830 A.2d 711, 7
- Page 83 and 84:
ers, the committee chair and majori
- Page 85 and 86:
90-day session and the 105th day of
- Page 87 and 88:
at 244, 547-48. 148 Aubrey Jewett,
- Page 89 and 90:
175 MAJOR LEGISLATION ANALYSIS 1997
- Page 91 and 92:
210 S4422B passed the Senate on Jun
- Page 93 and 94:
voted from 1997 through 2001 were a
- Page 95 and 96:
METHODOLOGY The research for this r
- Page 97 and 98:
■ Vote Outcomes for All Bills 199
- Page 99 and 100:
A9291-A, S6292-A S7833, A1103 A7162
- Page 101 and 102:
TELEPHONE SURVEY RESPONDENTS Alabam
- Page 103 and 104:
Montana Legislative Services Divisi
- Page 105 and 106:
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE BOARD OF
- Page 108:
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU S